Silas Granato Villas-Boas

Dr. Silas Granato Villas-Boas

Centre for Microbial Innovation, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2004 in Mass Spectrometry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Silas Granato Villas-BoasSilas Granato Villas-Boas
Silas Granato Villas-Boas
SMSandrine Mas
Sandrine Mas
MÅMats Åkesson
Mats Åkesson
JSJørn Smedsgaard
Jørn Smedsgaard
JNJens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen

30 September 2010 in Nature Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKathleen F Smart
Kathleen F Smart
RARaphael B M Aggio
Raphael B M Aggio
JHJeremy R Van Houtte
Jeremy R Van Houtte
Silas Granato Villas-BoasSilas Granato Villas-Boas
Silas Granato Villas-Boas

1 November 2017 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HRHenrik Munch Roager
Henrik Munch Roager
JVJosef K Vogt
Josef K Vogt
MKMette Kristensen
Mette Kristensen
LHLea Benedicte S Hansen
Lea Benedicte S Hansen
SISabine Ibrügger
Sabine Ibrügger
TLTine Rask Licht
Tine Rask Licht
Objective To investigate whether a whole grain diet alters the gut microbiome and insulin sensitivity, as well as biomarkers of metabolic health and gut functionality. Design 60 Danish adults at risk of developing metabolic syndrome were included in a randomised cross-over trial with two 8-week dietary intervention periods comprising whole grain diet and refined grain diet, separated by a washout period of ≥6 weeks. The response to the interventions on the gut microbiome composition and insulin sensitivity as well on measures of glucose and lipid metabolism, gut functionality, inflammatory markers, anthropometry and urine metabolomics were assessed. Results 50 participants completed both periods with a whole grain intake of 179±50 g/day and 13±10 g/day in the whole grain and refined grain period, respectively. Compliance was confirmed by a difference in plasma alkylresorcinols (p<0.0001). Compared with refined grain, whole grain did not significantly alter glucose homeostasis and did not induce major changes in the faecal microbiome. Also, breath hydrogen levels, plasma short-chain fatty acids, intestinal integrity and intestinal transit time were not affected. The whole grain diet did, however, compared with the refined grain diet, decrease body weight (p<0.0001), serum inflammatory markers, interleukin (IL)-6 (p=0.009) and C-reactive protein (p=0.003). The reduction in body weight was consistent with a reduction in energy intake, and IL-6 reduction was associated with the amount of whole grain consumed, in particular with intake of rye. Conclusion Compared with refined grain diet, whole grain diet did not alter insulin sensitivity and gut microbiome but reduced body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation. Trial registration number NCT01731366; Results.

21 October 2005 in Yeast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Silas Granato Villas-BoasSilas Granato Villas-Boas
Silas Granato Villas-Boas
JHJesper Højer‐Pedersen
Jesper Højer‐Pedersen
MÅMats Åkesson
Mats Åkesson
JSJørn Smedsgaard
Jørn Smedsgaard
JNJens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen
Sample preparation is considered one of the limiting steps in microbial metabolome analysis. Eukaryotes and prokaryotes behave very differently during the several steps of classical sample preparation methods for analysis of metabolites. Even within the eukaryote kingdom there is a vast diversity of cell structures that make it imprudent to blindly adopt protocols that were designed for a specific group of microorganisms. We have therefore reviewed and evaluated the whole sample preparation procedures for analysis of yeast metabolites. Our focus has been on the current needs in metabolome analysis, which is the analysis of a large number of metabolites with very diverse chemical and physical properties. This work reports the leakage of intracellular metabolites observed during quenching yeast cells with cold methanol solution, the efficacy of six different methods for the extraction of intracellular metabolites, and the losses noticed during sample concentration by lyophilization and solvent evaporation. A more reliable procedure is suggested for quenching yeast cells with cold methanol solution, followed by extraction of intracellular metabolites by pure methanol. The method can be combined with reduced pressure solvent evaporation and therefore represents an attractive sample preparation procedure for high‐throughput metabolome analysis of yeasts. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

23 October 2017 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFarhana Pinu
Farhana Pinu
Silas Granato Villas-BoasSilas Granato Villas-Boas
Silas Granato Villas-Boas
RARaphael Aggio
Raphael Aggio
Sample preparation is one of the most important steps in metabolome analysis. The challenges of determining microbial metabolome have been well discussed within the research community and many improvements have already been achieved in last decade. The analysis of intracellular metabolites is particularly challenging. Environmental perturbations may considerably affect microbial metabolism, which results in intracellular metabolites being rapidly degraded or metabolized by enzymatic reactions. Therefore, quenching or the complete stop of cell metabolism is a pre-requisite for accurate intracellular metabolite analysis. After quenching, metabolites need to be extracted from the intracellular compartment. The choice of the most suitable metabolite extraction method/s is another crucial step. The literature indicates that specific classes of metabolites are better extracted by different extraction protocols. In this review, we discuss the technical aspects and advancements of quenching and extraction of intracellular metabolite analysis from microbial cells.

13 November 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLea B. S. Hansen
Lea B. S. Hansen
HRHenrik Munch Roager
Henrik Munch Roager
NSNadja B. Søndertoft
Nadja B. Søndertoft
RGRikke J. Gøbel
Rikke J. Gøbel
MKMette Kristensen
Mette Kristensen
OPOluf Pedersen
Oluf Pedersen
Adherence to a low-gluten diet has become increasingly common in parts of the general population. However, the effects of reducing gluten-rich food items including wheat, barley and rye cereals in healthy adults are unclear. Here, we undertook a randomised, controlled, cross-over trial involving 60 middle-aged Danish adults without known disorders with two 8-week interventions comparing a low-gluten diet (2 g gluten per day) and a high-gluten diet (18 g gluten per day), separated by a washout period of at least six weeks with habitual diet (12 g gluten per day). We find that, in comparison with a high-gluten diet, a low-gluten diet induces moderate changes in the intestinal microbiome, reduces fasting and postprandial hydrogen exhalation, and leads to improvements in self-reported bloating. These observations suggest that most of the effects of a low-gluten diet in non-coeliac adults may be driven by qualitative changes in dietary fibres.