Alexis Ioannidis

Dr. Alexis Ioannidis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2017 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DTDaniel Thoma
Daniel Thoma
ISIrena Sailer
Irena Sailer
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis
MZMarcel Zwahlen
Marcel Zwahlen
Nikolay MakarovNikolay Makarov
Nikolay Makarov
BPBjarni E. Pjetursson
Bjarni E. Pjetursson

1 April 2020 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis
DBD. Bomze
D. Bomze
CHC.H.F. Hämmerle
C.H.F. Hämmerle
JHJ. Hüsler
J. Hüsler
OBO. Birrer
O. Birrer
SMS. Mühlemann
S. Mühlemann

1 February 2019 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis
SMSven Mühlemann
Sven Mühlemann
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan
JHJürg Hüsler
Jürg Hüsler
CHChristoph H.F. Hämmerle
Christoph H.F. Hämmerle
GBGoran I. Benic
Goran I. Benic
The objective of this study was to test whether or not the load-bearing capacity of occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials does differ from those of porcelain-fused-to-metal or lithium disilicate glass ceramic crowns. In 80 human molars occlusal enamel was removed without extending into the dentin in order to mimic substance defects caused by attrition. The restorations were digitally designed at a standardized thickness of either 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm. For each thickness, 4 test groups were formed each including a different restorative material: "0.5-ZIR": 0.5 mm thick zirconia (Vita YZ HT); "1.0-ZIR": 1.0 mm thick zirconia (Vita YZ HT); "0.5-LDC": 0.5 mm thick lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press); "1.0-LDC": 1.0 mm thick lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press); "0.5-HYC": 0.5 mm thick PICN (Vita Enamic); "1.0-HYC": 1.0 mm thick PICN (Vita Enamic); "0.5-COC": 0.5 mm thick tooth shaded resin composite (Lava Ultimate) and "1.0-COC": 1.0 mm thick tooth shaded resin composite (Lava ultimate). Each group consists of 10 specimens. Two additional groups of 10 specimens each were used as controls and exhibited conventional crown preparations. In one group the crowns were made of lithium-disilicate ceramic ("CLD": IPS e.max CAD) and the other group consisted of porcelain-fused to metal crowns ("PFM"). All restorations were cemented onto the prepared teeth following the manufacturer's instruction of the corresponding luting cement. Subsequently, they were thermo-mechanically aged and then loaded until fracture. Load-bearing capacities (Fmax) between the groups were compared applying the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05) and pairwise group comparisons using the Dunn's method. Median values (and quartiles) for the load-bearing capacity amounted to (Fmax) 2'407 (1'670; 2'490) N for the CLD group and to 2'033 (1'869; 2'445) N for the PFM group. For the 0.5 mm thick restorations Fmax reached the highest median value in group 0.5-HYC 2'390 (1'355; 2'490) N, followed by 0.5-COC 2'200 (1'217; 2'492) N and 0.5-LDC 1'692 (1'324; 2'355) N. No results were obtained for group 0.5-ZIR due to the impracticability to fabricate ultra-thin specimens. The distribution of the values for the 1.0 mm thick restorations was 2'489 (2'426; 2'491) N for 1.0-COC, 2'299 (2'156; 2'490) N for 1.0-ZIR, 2'124 (1'245; 2'491) N for 1.0-HYC, and 1'537 (1'245; 1'783) N for 1.0-LDC. The differences of the medians between the test and the control groups did not reach statistical significance for the 0.5 mm thick specimens (KW: p = 0.6952 and p = 0.6986). Within the groups exhibiting 1.0 mm thickness, however, significant different medians were found: 1.0-LDC < 1.0-ZIR and 1.0-LDC < 1.0-COC (KW: p < 0.0209). Regarding their maximum load-bearing capacity, minimally invasive occlusal veneers made of ceramic and hybrid materials can be applied to correct occlusal tooth wear and thus replace conventional crown restorations.

1 April 2016 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis
ABAndreas Bindl
Andreas Bindl
Only a few studies exist, which assess the clinical long-term behavior of all-ceramic FDPs in the posterior region. The aim of the present prospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior three-unit FDPs manufactured from Y-TZP after a service period up to 10 years. 55 patients received 59 three-unit FDPs in the posterior region of the maxilla or mandible. Abutment teeth were prepared and full-arch impressions were taken. Definitive casts were fabricated and optically scanned. Frameworks were fabricated with computer-aided design (CAD) and manufacturing (CAM) technology. Y-TZP frameworks were veneered and adhesively luted to the abutment teeth. Baseline and follow-up examinations (service time: ≥ 48 months) were recorded by applying modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) rating criteria. Cumulative survival rate was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier. Percentage of biological and technical complication was calculated. Fifty-three patients with 57 FDPs attended the last follow-up visit and a mean observation period of the remaining was 6.3 ± 1.9 years was calculated. Biological complications occurred in 17.5%, technical complications in 28% of the FDPs. The 10-year cumulative survival rate amounted 85.0%. Three FDPs failed to survive, two due to a root fracture of the abutment tooth and one due to secondary caries. Three-unit FDPs made from Y-TZP, veneered with ceramic offer a treatment option with a high rate of chipping. However, the manufacturing processes nowadays are modified in order to avoid this complication. The results of the present investigation suggest that three-unit Y-TZP posterior FDPs may are a possible treatment option. However, a high rate of chipping can be expected.

1 July 2019 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMila Maeder
Mila Maeder
PPPavla Pasic
Pavla Pasic
AEAdreas Ender
Adreas Ender
Mutlu ÖzcanMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan
GBGoran I. Benic
Goran I. Benic
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis

1 October 2022 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAlexis Ioannidis
Alexis Ioannidis
Ji-Man ParkJi-Man Park
Ji-Man Park
JHJürg Hüsler
Jürg Hüsler
DBDaniel Bomze
Daniel Bomze
SMSven Mühlemann
Sven Mühlemann
MÖMutlu Özcan
Mutlu Özcan