Nicole E. Neef

Dr. Nicole E. Neef

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLaurentius Huber
Laurentius Huber
JGJozien Goense
Jozien Goense
AKAneurin J. Kennerley
Aneurin J. Kennerley
RTRobert Trampel
Robert Trampel
MGMaria Guidi
Maria Guidi
HMHarald E. Möller
Harald E. Möller

1 April 2018 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GHGesa Hartwigsen
Gesa Hartwigsen
Nicole E. NeefNicole E. Neef
Nicole E. Neef
JCJulia A Camilleri
Julia A Camilleri
DMDaniel S Margulies
Daniel S Margulies
SESimon B Eickhoff
Simon B Eickhoff
Previous studies helped unraveling the functional architecture of the human cerebral cortex. However, a comprehensive functional segregation of right lateral prefrontal cortex is missing. Here, we delineated cortical clusters in right area 44 and 45 based on their task-constrained whole-brain activation patterns across neuroimaging experiments obtained from a large database. We identified 5 clusters that differed with respect to their coactivation patterns, which were consistent with resting-state functional connectivity patterns of an independent dataset. Two clusters in the posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were functionally associated with action inhibition and execution, while two anterior clusters were related to reasoning and social cognitive processes. A fifth cluster was associated with spatial attention. Strikingly, the functional organization of the right IFG can thus be characterized by a posterior-to-anterior axis with action-related functions on the posterior and cognition-related functions on the anterior end. We observed further subdivisions along a dorsal-to-ventral axis in posterior IFG between action execution and inhibition, and in anterior IFG between reasoning and social cognition. The different clusters were integrated in distinct large-scale networks for various cognitive processes. These results provide evidence for a general organization of cognitive processes along axes spanning from more automatic to more complex cognitive processes.

31 July 2015 in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nicole E. NeefNicole E. Neef
Nicole E. Neef
AAAlfred Anwander
Alfred Anwander
AFAngela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici

8 December 2017 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nicole E. NeefNicole E. Neef
Nicole E. Neef
AAAlfred Anwander
Alfred Anwander
CBChristoph Bütfering
Christoph Bütfering
CSCarsten Schmidt-Samoa
Carsten Schmidt-Samoa
AFAngela D Friederici
Angela D Friederici
MSMartin Sommer
Martin Sommer
A neuronal sign of persistent developmental stuttering is the magnified coactivation of right frontal brain regions during speech production. Whether and how stuttering severity relates to the connection strength of these hyperactive right frontal areas to other brain areas is an open question. Scrutinizing such brain–behaviour and structure–function relationships aims at disentangling suspected underlying neuronal mechanisms of stuttering. Here, we acquired diffusion-weighted and functional images from 31 adults who stutter and 34 matched control participants. Using a newly developed structural connectivity measure, we calculated voxel-wise correlations between connection strength and stuttering severity within tract volumes that originated from functionally hyperactive right frontal regions. Correlation analyses revealed that with increasing speech motor deficits the connection strength increased in the right frontal aslant tract, the right anterior thalamic radiation, and in U-shaped projections underneath the right precentral sulcus. In contrast, with decreasing speech motor deficits connection strength increased in the right uncinate fasciculus. Additional group comparisons of whole-brain white matter skeletons replicated the previously reported reduction of fractional anisotropy in the left and right superior longitudinal fasciculus as well as at the junction of right frontal aslant tract and right superior longitudinal fasciculus in adults who stutter compared to control participants. Overall, our investigation suggests that right fronto-temporal networks play a compensatory role as a fluency enhancing mechanism. In contrast, the increased connection strength within subcortical-cortical pathways may be implied in an overly active global response suppression mechanism in stuttering. Altogether, this combined functional MRI–diffusion tensor imaging study disentangles different networks involved in the neuronal underpinnings of the speech motor deficit in persistent developmental stuttering.

13 January 2015 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nicole E. NeefNicole E. Neef
Nicole E. Neef
THT. N. Linh Hoang
T. N. Linh Hoang
ANAndreas Neef
Andreas Neef
WPWalter Paulus
Walter Paulus
MSMartin Sommer
Martin Sommer
The precise excitability regulation of neuronal circuits in the primary motor cortex is central to the successful and fluent production of speech. Our question was whether the involuntary execution of undesirable movements, e.g. stuttering, is linked to an insufficient excitability tuning of neural populations in the orofacial region of the primary motor cortex. We determined the speech-related time course of excitability modulation in the left and right primary motor tongue representation. Thirteen fluent speakers (four females, nine males; aged 23–44) and 13 adults who stutter (four females, nine males, aged 21–55) were asked to build verbs with the verbal prefix ‘auf’. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex during the transition phase between a fixed labiodental articulatory configuration and immediately following articulatory configurations, at different latencies after transition onset. Bilateral electromyography was recorded from self-adhesive electrodes placed on the surface of the tongue. Off-line, we extracted the motor evoked potential amplitudes and normalized these amplitudes to the individual baseline excitability during the fixed configuration. Fluent speakers demonstrated a prominent left hemisphere increase of motor cortex excitability in the transition phase (P = 0.009). In contrast, the excitability of the right primary motor tongue representation was unchanged. Interestingly, adults afflicted with stuttering revealed a lack of left-hemisphere facilitation. Moreover, the magnitude of facilitation was negatively correlated with stuttering frequency. Although orofacial midline muscles are bilaterally innervated from corticobulbar projections of both hemispheres, our results indicate that speech motor plans are controlled primarily in the left primary speech motor cortex. This speech motor planning-related asymmetry towards the left orofacial motor cortex is missing in stuttering. Moreover, a negative correlation between the amount of facilitation and stuttering severity suggests that we discovered a main physiological principle of fluent speech production and its role in stuttering.

1 May 2020 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
UKUlrike Kuhl
Ulrike Kuhl
Nicole E. NeefNicole E. Neef
Nicole E. Neef
IKIndra Kraft
Indra Kraft
GSGesa Schaadt
Gesa Schaadt
LDLiane Dörr
Liane Dörr
MSMichael A. Skeide
Michael A. Skeide
Developmental dyslexia, a severe deficit in literacy learning, is a neurodevelopmental learning disorder. Yet, it is not clear whether existing neurobiological accounts of dyslexia capture potential predispositions of the deficit or consequences of reduced reading experience. Here, we longitudinally followed 32 children from preliterate to school age using functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Based on standardised and age-normed reading and spelling tests administered at school age, children were classified as 16 dyslexic participants and 16 controls. This longitudinal design allowed us to disentangle possible neurobiological predispositions for developing dyslexia from effects of individual differences in literacy experience. In our sample, the disorder can be predicted already before literacy learning from auditory cortex gyrification and aberrant downstream connectivity within the speech processing system. These results provide evidence for the notion that dyslexia may originate from an atypical maturation of the speech network that precedes literacy instruction.