The automotive industry is currently in a paradigm shift transferring the fleet over from internal combustion vehicles to battery electric vehicles (BEV). This introduces new challenges when designing the body-in-white (BIW) due to the sensitive and energy-dense battery that needs to be protected in a crash scenario. Press-hardening steels (PHS) have emerged as an excellent choice when designing crash safety parts due to their ability to be manufactured to complex parts with ultra-high strength. It is, however, crucial to evaluate the crash performance of the selected materials before producing parts. Component testing is cumbersome and expensive, often geometry dependent, and it is difficult to separate the bulk material behaviour from other influences such as spot welds. Fracture toughness measured using the essential work of fracture method is a material property which has shown to be able to rationalise crash resistance of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) grades and is thereby an interesting parameter in classifying steel grades for automotive applications. However, most of the published studies have been performed at quasi-static loading rates, which are vastly different from the strain rates involved in a crash. These higher strain rates may also lead to adiabatic self-heating which might influence the fracture toughness of the material. In this work, two PHS grades, high strength and very high strength, intended for automotive applications were investigated at lower and higher strain rates to determine the rate-dependence on the conventional tensile properties as well as the fracture toughness. Both PHS grades showed a small increase in conventional mechanical properties with increasing strain rate, while only the high-strength PHS grade showed a significant increase in fracture toughness with increasing loading rate. The adiabatic heating in the fracture process zone was estimated with a high-speed thermal camera showing a significant temperature increase up to 300 °C.