OBJECTIVE: We designed a multicenter randomized trial to compare 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates: prophylactic surfactant followed by a period of mechanical ventilation (prophylactic surfactant [PS]); prophylactic surfactant with rapid extubation to bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (intubate-surfactant-extubate [ISX]) or initial management with bubble continuous positive airway pressure and selective surfactant treatment (nCPAP). DESIGN/METHODS: Neonates born at 26$$\raisebox{1ex}{$0$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$7$}\right.$$ to 29$$\raisebox{1ex}{$6$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$7$}\right.$$ weeks9 gestation were enrolled at participating Vermont Oxford Network centers and randomly assigned to PS, ISX, or nCPAP groups before delivery. Primary outcome was the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks9 postmenstrual age. RESULTS: 648 infants enrolled at 27 centers. The study was halted before the desired sample size was reached because of declining enrollment. When compared with the PS group, the relative risk of BPD or death was 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.03) for the ISX group and 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.64–1.09) for the nCPAP group. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality or other complications of prematurity. In the nCPAP group, 48% were managed without intubation and ventilation, and 54% without surfactant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm neonates were initially managed with either nCPAP or PS with rapid extubation to nCPAP had similar clinical outcomes to those treated with PS followed by a period of mechanical ventilation. An approach that uses early nCPAP leads to a reduction in the number of infants who are intubated and given surfactant.

OBJECTIVE. Family-centered care has become integral to the provision of quality neonatal intensive care. However, practices that reflect the core principles of family-centered care have not been described fully in the literature or implemented and evaluated consistently within newborn intensive care. The objective of this study was to create a family-centered care map that enhances the ability of the health care team to work with families to coordinate and deliver care in a holistic manner to meet the developmental, physical, and psychosocial needs of NICU patients and their families.METHODS. Potentially better practices were developed for sequential clinical phases by using standardized methods. These included focus groups with families, brainstorming sessions with staff, literature review, and input from established family advisory groups and family-centered care experts. Potentially better practices then were integrated into the family-centered care map that was configured in a Web-based format. Overall utility will be evaluated by determining the effect of the family-centered care map on length of stay, parental satisfaction, and family-centered care beliefs and practices among NICU staff.RESULTS. Sixty-three potentially better practices were identified for 7 clinical phases and 3 variations that were believed to characterize the clinical course of a typical NICU patient. A prototype of the Web-based family-centered care map that illustrates the clinical phases with links to the related potentially better practices, operational processes, and case studies was created. Baseline data from a care provider survey, from a family satisfaction survey, and on length of stay have been collected.CONCLUSIONS. Quality improvement methods and collaboration among 3 centers led to the development of an innovative Web-based resource to assist individual care providers and family advisors to provide comprehensive family-centered care to infants and families. Implementation of the family-centered care map has potential to affect positively the quality of newborn intensive care and lead to improved long-term outcomes.