Oyshik Banerjee

Dr. Oyshik Banerjee

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2019 in Islets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKristen R Szempruch
Kristen R Szempruch
OBOyshik Banerjee
Oyshik Banerjee
RCRebecca Carlson
Rebecca Carlson
CDChirag S. Desai
Chirag S. Desai
Immunologic and non-immunologic loss of islet cells upon their transplantation into the liver leads to suboptimal outcomes. Anti-inflammatory agents are used during autologous and allogeneic transplantation. The aim of this qualitative systematic literature review is to evaluate their clinical use and safety. Electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EU Clinical Trials Register were searched. Of the 216 unique citations, 10 with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers [etanercept (ETA) or infliximab] and 3 with both TNF blockers and an interluekin-1 receptor antagonist [anakinra (ANA)]) were included. Of these, 12 were in allogeneic and one in autologous transplant. Insulin independence with decreased islet cells and number of transfusions were reported with their use. One infection was reported in a group receiving ETA. Analysis suggested that the use of ETA ± ANA have the potential to improve outcomes in islet cell transplant.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOyshik Banerjee
Oyshik Banerjee
RRRoysten Rodrigues
Roysten Rodrigues
LALauren Adkins
Lauren Adkins
KBKatharina Maria Busl
Katharina Maria Busl
Background/Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of morbidity in the neurocritical ill patient population. There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing and choice of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) and how these decisions relate to balancing the risk of bleeding complications with the development of VTE. Our review assesses the available data to provide un updated perspective to clinicians. Methods: A literature search was performed in December 2024 in PubMed and EMBASE. We focused on the timing of PTP initiation and the comparison of enoxaparin (ENX) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), spinal or spinal cord injury (SCI), or requirement for neurosurgical intervention. Results: We included 90 articles spanning a total of 669,725 patients with injuries of interest within neurocritical care. The existing data largely signaled a benefit of early administration (<24–72 h) of PTP in VTE prevention, though some studies suggested increased risks of complications. Data to inform a preference for PTP agent was less robust, though a signal of benefit for enoxaparin is suggested for subsets of patients with acute brain injury such as TBI. The data quality is limited by the large body of retrospective studies, the heterogeneity of study populations, outcome definitions, study methodologies, and the lack of detailed reporting of relevant factors. Conclusions: Our review provides an updated assessment of the available data on PTP timing and choice in neurocritically ill patients with hemorrhages or surgical need, with a practice-focused overview for clinicians balancing VTE risk with bleeding risk. The data suggest that in most circumstances, early PTP appears safe and indicated, and that low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) can be considered over UFH in certain subsets of patients. Still, data gaps and conflicting results highlight the need for patient-specific decision making and indicate that more robust research is warranted to inform optimal clinical practice.

12 December 2023 in Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OBOyshik Banerjee
Oyshik Banerjee
JEJessica L. Elefritz
Jessica L. Elefritz
BDBruce A. Doepker
Bruce A. Doepker
SASara A. Atyia
Sara A. Atyia
NBNathan E. Brummel
Nathan E. Brummel
KCKari M. Cape
Kari M. Cape
Background: Early neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium has been associated with improved outcomes in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Previous studies have demonstrated increased drug utilization without benefits in oxygenation using fixed dose cisatracurium compared to train-of-four (TOF) titration. Objective: We sought to compare a novel, lower fixed dose cisatracurium protocol to TOF titration evaluating the impact on PaO2:FiO2 ratio (P/F). Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study comparing fixed dose cisatracurium to TOF titration. We included patients aged 18-89 treated for COVID-19 ARDS with a baseline P/F≤200 who received a cisatracurium infusion for ≥12 h. The primary outcome was change in P/F at 48 h from baseline. Secondary outcomes included change in P/F at 24 h and 7 days, need for mechanical ventilation at day 28, and cisatracurium utilization. Results: Analyses included 125 patients (fixed dose = 65, TOF = 60). Severe ARDS was common with a baseline median P/F of 73.7 vs 79.5, P = .133. The change in P/F at 48 h was larger in the TOF cohort in the adjusted analysis (24.9 vs 70.8, P < .005). The rate and total cumulative dose of cisatracurium were higher in the fixed dose cohort (5 vs 3 mcg/kg/min, P < .001; 1034 vs 612 mg, P < .001) despite similar infusion durations (44.1 h vs 48.5 h, P = .642). Conclusions: Patients in the TOF cisatracurium cohort had improved P/F at 48 h compared to the fixed dose cohort, while also using only 60% of the cumulative dose. Future directions should include analysis of the implications of increased cisatracurium exposure on patient outcomes.