Rheumatoid factor (RF) is the first autoantibody identified in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which targets the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of immunoglobulin (Ig) G. Although IgM isotype is predominant, other Ig isotypes, including IgG and IgA, also exist. While RF is not specific to RA, it remains a valuable serological test for diagnosing the disease, as evidenced by its inclusion in the 2010 classification criteria for RA based on elevated serum RF levels. RF is also associated with RA severity, including joint damage and extra-articular manifestations, serving as a poor prognostic factor and aiding in the identification of difficult-to-treat RA. Recent studies have demonstrated that high serum RF levels are associated with a reduced response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. In contrast, anti-TNF antibodies lacking the Fc portion have shown stable efficacy in RA patients regardless of baseline RF levels. These findings reaffirm the clinical significance of RF measurement, 80 years after its initial discovery. This review explores the diagnostic and prognostic significance of RF and its impact on treatment selection in RA management.

With the aging of the population, malignancies are becoming common complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly in elderly patients. Such malignancies often interfere with RA treatment. Among several therapeutic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) which antagonize immunological brakes on T lymphocytes have emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of malignancies. In parallel, evidence has accumulated that ICIs are associated with numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as hypophysitis, myocarditis, pneumonitis, and colitis. Moreover, ICIs not only exacerbate pre-existing autoimmune diseases, but also cause de novo rheumatic disease–like symptoms, such as arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis, which are currently termed rheumatic irAEs. Rheumatic irAEs differ from classical rheumatic diseases in multiple aspects, and treatment should be individualized based on the severity. Close collaboration with oncologists is critical for preventing irreversible organ damage. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the mechanisms and management of rheumatic irAEs with focus on arthritis, myositis, and vasculitis. Based on these findings, potential therapeutic strategies against rheumatic irAEs are discussed.

Objectives: To investigate the predictive factors for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) and assess the efficacy of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the ANSWER cohort comprising 3623 RA patients treated with bDMARDs or JAKi in Japan. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse the hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment retention. Results: Of the 3623 RA patients, 450 (12.4%) met the first two criteria of the EULAR D2T RA definition (defined as D2T RA in this study). Factors contributing to D2T RA included age over 75 (compared with those under 65, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.69), higher rheumatoid factor (RF) titres (HR = 1.005; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01), higher clinical disease activity index (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), lower methotrexate dosage (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and comorbidities like hypertension (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.95) and diabetes (HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.73). Anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies (aIL-6R, HR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.75) and JAKi (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.90) were associated with fewer discontinuations due to ineffectiveness compared with TNF inhibitors. Oral glucocorticoid usage (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.47) was linked to increased discontinuation due to toxic adverse events. Conclusion: Younger onset, higher RF titres, and comorbidities predicted D2T RA development. For managing D2T RA, aIL-6R and JAKi exhibited superior drug retention.

The varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a human neurotropic herpes virus responsible for varicella and herpes zoster (HZ). Following primary infection in childhood, VZV manifests as varicella (chickenpox) and enters a period of latency within the dorsal root ganglion. A compromised cellular immune response due to aging or immunosuppression triggers viral reactivation and the development of HZ (shingles). Patients with autoimmune diseases have a higher risk of developing HZ owing to the immunodeficiency associated with the disease itself and/or the use of immunosuppressive agents. The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents with unique mechanisms has expanded the treatment options for autoimmune diseases but has also increased the risk of HZ. Specifically, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and anifrolumab have raised concerns regarding HZ. Despite treatment advances, a substantial number of patients suffer from complications such as postherpetic neuralgia for prolonged periods. The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is considered safe and effective even in immunocompromised patients. The widespread adoption of RZV may reduce the health and socioeconomic burdens of HZ patients. This review covers the link between VZV and autoimmune diseases, assesses the risk of HZ associated with immunosuppressant use, and discusses the benefits and risks of using RZV in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Type I interferons (IFN-I) are pivotal effectors of innate immunity and constitute a central axis of host defense against pathogens. Sensing of exogenous or endogenous nucleic acids by pattern-recognition receptors—exemplified by Toll-like receptors—triggers transcriptional induction of IFN-I. Engagement of the heterodimeric IFN-I receptor on nucleated cells reprograms cellular states via canonical Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT) signaling as well as STAT-independent, noncanonical pathways. This axis is tempered by multilayered regulatory mechanisms, including epigenetic remodeling, and important aspects remain incompletely defined. Dysregulation of IFN-I activity underlies diverse autoimmune disorders, notably systemic lupus erythematosus, wherein IFN-responsive gene signatures stratify disease endotypes, reflect disease activity trajectories, and predict therapeutic responsiveness. In recent years, therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway are now available: anti-IFN-I receptor therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and JAK inhibition for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). Altogether, a refined understanding of the IFN-I axis furnishes a pragmatic framework for patient stratification, response prediction, and mechanism-informed therapy design across immune-mediated diseases.

Objective: This study aimed to compare drug retention rates according to the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with RA initiating biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). Methods: Data were obtained from 774 treatment courses with moderate to high disease activity at the initiation of b/tsDMARD therapy from the Kansai Multicentre ANSWER cohort. Patients were categorized into NLRlow group and NLRhigh group based on the median NLR value of 3.30. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for drug retention over 2 years. Results: Patients in the NLRhigh group exhibited significantly higher baseline Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores (P = 0.004) and more frequent glucocorticoid use (P < 0.001) than those in the NLRlow group. In the NLRlow group, drug retention rates did not significantly differ among tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies (aIL-6R), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). In contrast, within the NLRhigh group, treatment with aIL-6R and JAKi was associated with significantly higher retention rates compared with TNFi (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32–0.88; HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20–0.64, respectively). At 12 months, CDAI scores did not significantly differ among the four treatment groups in either NLR group. Conclusion: In patients with elevated baseline NLR values, aIL-6R and JAKi may offer superior drug retention compared with TNFi when initiating b/tsDMARD therapy.