The prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss has increased along with increases in life expectancy and exposure to noisy environments. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of co-occurring conditions that increase the risk of heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes, along with other conditions that affect the blood vessels. Components of MetS include insulin resistance, body weight, lipid concentration, blood pressure, and blood glucose concentration, as well as other features of insulin resistance such as microalbuminuria. MetS has become a major public health problem affecting 20–30% of the global population. This study utilized health examination to investigate whether metabolic syndrome was related to hearing loss. Methods: A total of 94,223 people who underwent health check-ups, including hearing tests, from January 2010 to December 2020 were evaluated. Subjects were divided into two groups, with and without metabolic syndrome. In addition, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries were systematically searched, using keywords such as “hearing loss” and “metabolic syndrome”, for studies that evaluated the relationship between the two. Results: Of the 94,223 subjects, 11,414 (12.1%) had metabolic syndrome and 82,809 did not. The mean ages of subjects in the two groups were 46.1 and 43.9 years, respectively. A comparison of hearing thresholds by age in subjects with and without metabolic syndrome showed that the average pure tone hearing thresholds were significantly higher in subjects with metabolic syndrome than in subjects without it in all age groups. (p < 0.001) Rates of hearing loss in subjects with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the components of metabolic syndrome were 7.9%, 12.1%, 13.8%, 13.8%, 15.5% and 16.3%, respectively, indicating a significant association between the number of components of metabolic syndrome and the rate of hearing loss (p < 0.0001). The odds ratio of hearing loss was significantly higher in subjects with four components of metabolic syndrome: waist circumference, blood pressure, and triglyceride and fasting blood sugar concentrations (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The number of components of the metabolic syndrome is positively correlated with the rate of sensorineural hearing loss.

Importance: The optimal treatment approach for patients with Bell’s palsy, a condition characterized by acute facial nerve palsy, remains unclear. The present study was designed to provide insights into the most effective treatment strategies, whether steroids alone or steroids plus antiviral agents, as well as the optimal timing of treatment initiation. Objective: To investigate the impact of treatment modalities and timing on the recovery rates of Bell’s palsy patients and to assess the roles of individual factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis included 1504 patients with Bell’s palsy who visited Kyung Hee University Hospital. Patients were divided based on the treatment modality (steroid monotherapy vs. combined steroid and antiviral therapy) and the timing of treatment initiation (≤72 vs. >72 h). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the recovery rate, as assessed by the House–Brackmann (HB) grade. Secondary outcomes included factors such as age, electroneurography (ENoG) and electromyography (EMG) results, and comorbid conditions. Results: A combined comparison of patients treated with steroids plus antivirals and steroids alone, stratified by treatment start time, showed that recovery rates were highest in patients who received steroid monotherapy initiated within 72 h (OR 2.36; p < 0.05). Patients with severe Bell’s palsy tended to benefit more from combined therapy when treatment was initiated within 72 h. The recovery rate was higher in patients who received steroid monotherapy than combined therapy (86.32% vs. 79.25%, p < 0.05). Initiating treatment beyond 72 h was associated with a higher recovery rate than starting treatment within 72 h (85.69% vs. 76.92%, p < 0.05). An evaluation of the factors affecting recovery showed that patients aged 20 to 39 years had a higher recovery rate than other age groups (OR 1.47; p < 0.05). Fairly predictive EMG results were associated with significantly higher recovery rates (OR 3.52; p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment approaches in Bell’s palsy management. Steroid monotherapy remains effective, although combined treatment may have potential advantages, especially in patients with more severe disease. The best treatment results were achieved when steroid treatment was administered within 72 h. Our results suggest that there may be more flexibility in the application of the 72 h treatment period if we consider the time of treatment initiation alone, but this should take into account patient behavior patterns and the limitations of retrospective analysis. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and refine treatment recommendations for patients with Bell’s palsy.

(1) Background: The effectiveness of decompression surgery for Bell’s palsy is controversial. This study investigated the effects of facial nerve decompression in patients with severe Bell’s palsy who were expected to have a poor prognosis. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1721 patients with Bell’s palsy who visited the Kyung Hee University Hospital between January 2005 and December 2021. Of these, 45 patients with severe Bell’s palsy were divided into two groups; 30 patients were treated conservatively with steroids and antiviral agents alone, while 15 patients underwent additional decompressive surgery after the conservative treatment. Outcomes were measured using House–Brackmann (H–B) grade for least 6 months after treatment was finished and conducted until full recovery was achieved. (3) Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of favorable recovery (H–B grade 1 or 2) between the surgery group and the conservative treatment group (75% vs. 70.0%, p > 0.05). Although H–B grade improvement occurred in both groups, the degree of improvement was not significantly different between groups. (4) Conclusions: Facial nerve decompression surgery in severe Bell’s palsy patients did not significantly improve prognosis beyond that offered by conservative treatment alone. Additional surgical decompression may not be necessary in patients with severe Bell’s palsy if they receive sufficient conservative treatment.

This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment prognoses of patients with Herpes Zoster Oticus (HZO) and concurrent hearing loss (HL). Various clinical characteristics of 192 patients with HZO, with or without concurrent HL, from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed through a chart review. All patients were followed-up until recovery or up to 12 months. Demographic and clinical findings were compared between the groups, and the recovery rates of facial palsy, hearing, and other clinical features were analyzed. Facial palsy recovery was analyzed using the House–Brackmann (HB) grading system, and hearing recovery rates were analyzed using the Siegel criteria. Of the 192 patients diagnosed with HZO, 142 had no hearing loss (HZO without HL), and 50 had hearing loss (HZO with HL). While both groups had similar ages, treatment timings, and underlying diseases, the HZO w HL group had a significantly higher rate of dizziness and tinnitus, but received more intratympanic steroid injections. In terms of facial palsy, there were no significant differences in the initial HB grade or recovery rates between the groups. Within the HZO w HL group, hearing loss severity varied, with 52% experiencing mild loss and only 16% achieving complete recovery. Descending-type audiograms were the most common at 66%. In patients with HZO, there was no statistically significant difference between the degree of initial facial paralysis and the degree of recovery of the final facial paralysis according to concurrent HL. However, among patients with concurrent HL, the hearing recovery rate in the HZO group was low.

Neuropeptides and neurotransmitters act as intermediaries to transmit impulses from one neuron to another via a synapse. These neuropeptides are also related to nerve degeneration and regeneration during nerve damage. Although there are various neuropeptides, three are associated with neural regeneration in facial nerve damage: calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), galanin, and pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP). Alpha CGRP in facial motoneurons is a signaling factor involved in neuroglial and neuromuscular interactions during regeneration. Thus, it may be a marker for facial nerve regeneration. Galanin is a marker of injured axons rather than nerve regeneration. PACAP has various effects on nerve regeneration by regulating the surrounding cells and providing neurotrophic factors. Thus, it may also be used as a marker for facial nerve regeneration. However, the precise roles of these substances in nerve generation are not yet fully understood. Animal studies have demonstrated that they may act as neuromodulators to promote neurotrophic factors involved in nerve regeneration as they appear early, before changes in the injured cells and their environment. Therefore, they may be markers of nerve regeneration.

BACKGROUND: Side effects occurring after COVID-19 vaccination can include vertigo and dizziness. Despite its high incidence, few studies to date have assessed dizziness/vertigo after vaccination. The present study investigated the incidence of dizziness/vertigo after COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea. METHODS: Adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccination reported to the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency from February 26, 2021, to July 31, 2022 (week 74) were analyzed. The incidence rates of dizziness/vertigo in subjects vaccinated with 5 COVID-19 vaccines, AZD1222 (AstraZeneca), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), JNJ-78436735 (Janssen), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax), were determined. RESULTS: A total of 126 725 952 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were administered, with 473 755 suspected adverse reactions (374 per 100 000 vaccinations) reported. Vertigo/dizziness was reported after the administration of 68 759 doses, or 54.3 per 100 000 vaccinations, making it the third most common adverse reaction after headache and muscle pain. CONCLUSION: Dizziness/vertigo was generally a mild adverse reaction after COVID-19 vaccination, but it was the third most common adverse reaction in Korea. Studies are necessary to clarify the causal relationship between vaccination and dizziness/vertigo and to prepare subjects for this possible adverse reaction. Cite this article as: Hoon Kim S, Keon Yon D, Sung Choi Y, et al. Vertigo and dizziness after coronavirus disease-2019 vaccination: A nationwide analysis. J Int Adv Otol. 2023;19(3):228-233.