Focal Therapy (FT) is an emerging treatment modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to its novelty, the research exploring how patients should be followed-up after treatment is limited. There is currently no established role for non-prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) biomarkers and PSMA PET. However, a combination of PSA testing, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and systematic and targeted biopsies should routinely be used for surveillance after FT. PSA values that rise 1.0 ng/mL over the nadir after twelve months or rise 1.5 ng/mL over nadir after twenty-four to thirty-six months should raise suspicion for recurrence. The standard imaging technique is mpMRI, but it can often be difficult to interpret after FT, so using a scoring system such as prostate imaging after focal ablation (PI-FAB) or the transatlantic recommendations for prostate gland evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging after focal therapy (TARGET) allows for greater consistency between readers. This review seeks to summarize the current literature regarding surveillance after FT as it relates to biomarkers, imaging, biopsies, and consensus statements.
We have determined in mice the minimum composition required for forming a vaccine adjuvant that stimulates a regulatory T (Treg) cell response to immunization, and we named the adjuvant “complete tolerogenic adjuvant.” This new kind of adjuvant may let us use the well-proven “Ag with adjuvant” form of immunization for inducing Treg cell–mediated Ag-specific immunosuppression. The minimum composition consists of dexamethasone, rapamycin, and monophosphoryl lipid A at a mass ratio of 8:20:3. By dissecting the respective role of each of these components during immunization, we have further shown why immunosuppressive and immunogenic agents are both needed for forming true adjuvants for Treg cells. This finding may guide the design of additional, and potentially more potent, complete tolerogenic adjuvants with which we may form numerous novel vaccines for treating immune diseases.
As the adoption of focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) grows, the demand for accurate post-treatment imaging to monitor outcomes and detect residual or recurrent cancer increases. Traditional diagnostic systems like the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) are ill-suited for post-FT evaluations due to treatment-induced tissue changes. MRI-based scoring systems specific for evaluation after FT have been developed to address these challenges and improve post-FT imaging accuracy by distinguishing benign alterations from recurrence. The currently developed scoring systems are Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET) and Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB). In this review, we describe and compare these two systems. These scoring systems standardize imaging assessments, enhance follow-up care, and support clinical decision-making. While promising, TARGET and PI-FAB require further large-scale validation to confirm their utility. Nevertheless, they represent critical advances in optimizing PCa management, particularly for patients undergoing FT, by improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding treatment decisions.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Treatments for PCa with less adverse effects than whole gland interventions, such as focal therapy (FT), often involve a higher risk of PCa recurrence. Combining FT with other treatments could increase the efficacy while maintaining a low side effect profile. This study aims to determine the proportion of residual/recurrent clinically significant PCa following the combination treatment of three months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and FT of the prostate, as well as the safety of this treatment regimen. Methods: This study will be a single arm phase II trial with a recruitment goal of 57 patients with treatment naïve non-metastatic intermediate risk PCa. Patients will complete the I-PSS, SHIM, and EPIC-26 questionnaires at the screening visit. Patients will then comply with a three-month treatment course of ADT. Eight weeks after beginning ADT, patients will undergo FT of the prostate via high intensity focused ultrasound or cryoablation. Follow up visits will occur every three months for a year post FT to monitor for side effects, repeat questionnaires, perform a clinical assessment, and obtain PSA and testosterone values. Twelve months after FT, a surveillance multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy will be performed to assess for treatment failure. Discussion: The primary endpoint of this trial is to determine the proportion of men with clinically significant PCa as evaluated by a surveillance mpMRI and MRI-TB at 12-months following FT. If successful, this treatment approach could offer a new option for treatment with fewer side effects than whole gland interventions and more efficacy than FT alone. Furthermore it could inform the need for further research into multimodal treatment options for PCa. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05790213. Registered on March 30, 2023.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis remains a complex field of study. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) technology presents opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision. While recent advances in imaging and biopsy techniques show promise, the oncological implications of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combination biopsy (ComBx) are not fully understood. This retrospective study evaluates the potential clinical impact of prebiopsy MRI and ComBx on PCa treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of treatment-naïve patients undergoing prostate biopsy and subsequent radiation therapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy at the University of Cincinnati Health Center (2014–2020). Patients were categorized into two cohorts: those with prebiopsy mpMRI and ComBx versus those with systematic biopsy (SBx) alone. Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL were excluded. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL post-prostatectomy or ≥2 ng/mL above nadir post-RT. Results: This study included 518 patients (189 SBx, 329 ComBx) with a median follow-up of 19.1 months. Median patient ages were 65.9 years (SBx) and 64.6 years (ComBx). The overall BCR rate was 10% with significantly lower rates in the ComBx group compared to SBx (6.4% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed patients undergoing prebiopsy mpMRI with ComBx were 63% less likely to experience BCR (HR: 0.37, 95%CI 0.20–0.70, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Prebiopsy MRI followed by ComBx demonstrated lower BCR rates, suggesting improved PCa diagnosis and risk stratification. These findings highlight the potential of advanced imaging and biopsy techniques to benefit the management of PCa. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the long-term clinical benefits of this approach.