Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut–brain interaction, with a multifactorial pathophysiology involving gut–brain axis dysregulation, visceral hypersensitivity, microbiota imbalance, and immune dysfunction. Traditional IBS management emphasizes dietary modifications and pharmacologic therapies. However, increasing attention has been directed toward functional foods, nutraceuticals, and herbal remedies due to their potential to target IBS pathophysiological mechanisms with favorable safety profiles. This clinical review explores the role of these adjunctive therapies, evaluating evidence from preclinical and clinical studies. Functional foods such as kiwifruit, prunes, and rye bread demonstrate benefits in bowel habit regulation through fiber content and microbiota modulation. Nutraceuticals like peppermint oil, palmitoylethanolamide, and herbal mixtures exhibit anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, and analgesic effects. Prebiotics provide substrate-driven microbiota changes, although dosage is key, as given their fermentative properties, when used at high dosages, they can exacerbate symptoms in some individuals. Probiotics and postbiotics offer microbiota-based interventions with promising symptom relief in IBS subtypes, although factors for personalized treatment still need to be further elucidated. These strategies highlight a paradigm shift in IBS management, integrating diet-based therapies with evolving nutraceutical options to improve patient outcomes. Despite promising findings, challenges in standardizing definitions, mechanisms, and safety profiles still remain. Rigorous, large-scale trials to validate the therapeutic potential of these interventions are needed, to enhance the benefits of these compounds with an individualized treatment approach.

The gut microbiota significantly impacts the development and progression of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal and gastric cancers. Microbial dysbiosis contributes to carcinogenesis through mechanisms such as inflammation, immune modulation, and direct DNA damage. Techniques for sampling oral, esophageal, and gastric microbiota vary, with standardization being essential for reliable results. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are associated with an enrichment of Gram-negative bacteria, promoting inflammation and cancer progression. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) also shows distinct microbial patterns, with reduced diversity and increased harmful bacteria like Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. In gastric cancer (GC), Helicobacter pylori (HP) and non-HP gastric microbiota play significant roles, with diverse microbial communities contributing to cancer development through nitrate reduction, immune modulation, and inflammation. Emerging evidence highlights the role of non-HP bacteria in promoting carcinogenesis, with specific taxa like Fusobacterium nucleatum and Lactobacillus influencing tumor growth and immune evasion. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interactions between gut microbiota and upper GI cancers, paving the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Understanding these microbial dynamics offers potential for microbiota-based interventions, improving the early detection, prognosis, and treatment of upper GI cancers. This comprehensive review summarizes the available evidence on the role of microbiota in upper GI oncology and the need for continued exploration in this field.

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has emerged in the past two decades as the cornerstone for assessing small bowel disorders, and its use is supported by several guidelines. However, there are several limitations, such as the considerable time required for gastroenterologists to review these videos and reach a diagnosis. To address these limitations, researchers have explored the integration of artificial intelligence in the interpretation of these videos. In our review, we explore the evolving and emerging role of artificial intelligence in SBCE and examine the latest advancements and ongoing studies in these areas, aiming at overcoming current limitations.

Background: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely implemented as a first‐line tool in organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, including Italy. Following a positive FIT, colonoscopy is recommended. Computer‐aided detection (CADe) systems have the potential to enhance adenoma detection, particularly in FIT‐positive populations where identifying advanced adenomas is critical for cancer prevention. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of CADe‐assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy (SC) in a FIT‐based screening cohort. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with a positive FIT result were randomized to undergo either CADe‐assisted or standard colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). Secondary endpoints included overall adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and mean withdrawal time (WT). Results: Of 1077 patients enrolled, 68 were excluded due to inadequate bowel preparation, leaving 1009 patients for analysis (CADe: n = 506; SC: n = 503). AADR was comparable between the groups (21.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.794). However, CADe significantly improved ADR (67.6% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.012) and APC (1.82 ± 2.12 vs. 1.34 ± 1.81, p < 0.001). Mean WT was longer in the CADe group (17.10 ± 8.28 min vs. 16.13 ± 8.28 min, p = 0.016). Conclusions: In a FIT‐based organized CRC screening setting, CADe did not enhance detection of AADR with a modest increase in withdrawal time. NCT04441580.

ISHS XIII International Symposium on Virus Diseases of Ornamental Plants DETECTION OF A MIXED VIRUS POPULATION IN FREESIA PLANTS WITH NECROTIC DISEASE