Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of adenotonsillectomy (AT) for treating uncomplicated pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children of different ages. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases, and 71 studies with a total of 9087 participants were included in the analysis. The studies were all before-and-after studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials. Surgical results were analyzed according to age, disease severity, and follow-up duration. Results: Children younger than 7 years at the time of AT had a significantly greater decrease in disease severity, a greater decrease in hypoxemic burden, improved sleep quality, and improved cardiovascular function than children older than 7 years. Both cognitive and behavioral performance improved postoperatively, although these changes were more significantly associated with the duration of follow-up than with age at surgery. Notably, the rate of surgical complications was much greater in children under the age of 3. Conclusions: The current evidence indicates that AT is performed optimally between the ages of 3 and 7 years, offering the greatest chance of disease resolution and remission of associated conditions, balanced with a reduction in surgical risk. We highly recommend conducting high-quality randomized controlled trials to further inform the clinical guidelines for pediatric AT.
Background: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is a common surgical procedure among pediatrics, usually performed to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), recurrent tonsillitis, and chronic adenoid hypertrophy. The aim of our systematic review is to evaluate the relationship between AT and postoperative weight gain in children to guide clinicians in optimizing surgical outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Studies evaluating weight, BMI, and growth parameters before and after AT were included. Data were collaboratively extracted, including patient demographics, baseline weight status, comorbidities, and long-term outcomes. Results: Underweight children (less than the 3rd percentile on the growth chart) who underwent AT often experienced “catch-up growth” in weight, while obese children (above the 95th percentile on the growth chart) had postoperative weight gain that exacerbated pre-existing obesity. These outcomes were affected by factors such as baseline weight, age, and comorbid conditions. Conclusions: AT can improve the quality of life in underweight children, while overweight or obese children need careful monitoring and nutrition counseling postoperatively to mitigate excessive weight gain. More randomized trials are needed to better understand the metabolic and growth implications of AT and to refine clinical guidelines.