Francesco Pichi

Dr. Francesco Pichi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
DSDavid Sarraf
David Sarraf
SASruthi Arepalli
Sruthi Arepalli
CLCareen Y. Lowder
Careen Y. Lowder
ECEmmett T. Cunningham
Emmett T. Cunningham
SSSunil K. Srivastava
Sunil K. Srivastava

2 September 2021 in JAMA Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
SAShaikha Aljneibi
Shaikha Aljneibi
PNPiergiorgio Neri
Piergiorgio Neri
SHSteven Hay
Steven Hay
CDChristine Dackiw
Christine Dackiw
NGNicola G. Ghazi
Nicola G. Ghazi
As of March 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused 35 million infections and more than 1 million deaths worldwide, leading to the urgent demand for a vaccine.1 To date, 2 inactivated vaccine candidates have been reported to protect against SARS-CoV-2. The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine by Sinopharm’s China National Biotec Group is mixed with aluminum-based adjuvant and has been found tolerable and immunogenic in healthy people with 2 doses administered 21 days apart.2 As of March 2021, the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Health and Prevention announced that the United Arab Emirates had crossed 2 million doses of the Sinopharm inactivated vaccine (20% of the population). We hereby present a case series of ocular adverse events presenting at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates after receiving the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine.

18 July 2013 in International Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
ALAndrea Lembo
Andrea Lembo
MMMariachiara Morara
Mariachiara Morara
CVChiara Veronese
Chiara Veronese
MAMicol Alkabes
Micol Alkabes
ACAntonio P. Ciardella
Antonio P. Ciardella

30 May 2020 in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
SSScott D. Smith
Scott D. Smith
EAEmad B. Abboud
Emad B. Abboud
PNPiergiorgio Neri
Piergiorgio Neri
EWElizabeth Woodstock
Elizabeth Woodstock
CBCaroline R. Baumal
Caroline R. Baumal

2 November 2017 in Acta Ophthalmologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
EAEmad B. Abboud
Emad B. Abboud
NGNicola G. Ghazi
Nicola G. Ghazi
AKArif O. Khan
Arif O. Khan

5 October 2017 in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pichi
Francesco Pichi
DSDavid Sarraf
David Sarraf
MMMariachiara Morara
Mariachiara Morara
SMShahana Mazumdar
Shahana Mazumdar
PNPiergiorgio Neri
Piergiorgio Neri
VGVishali Gupta
Vishali Gupta
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) employs a novel imaging algorithm that detects the amplitude or phase decorrelation of blood cell movement. It thus provides a flow map with depth-resolved visualization of the various vascular layers in the posterior pole of the eye including the retina capillary plexus and the choroid. In the past 3 years, the number of research papers on the subject of OCTA in retinal diseases has grown exponentially including important applications in the field of uveitis. While the study of OCTA in uveitic diseases has gained remarkable relevance worldwide, interpretation can be challenging, and many limitations exist in optimally using this advanced system in uveitic eyes. The aim of this review is to describe the many significant applications of OCTA in uveitis disorders and to outline the various limitations that can confound interpretation and support uveitis specialists in the integration of OCTA in the multimodal imaging approach to inflammatory diseases. Unlike conventional angiography that can dynamically detect inflammation and leakage of dye from retinal vessels, OCTA provides other important biomarkers of inflammation. Detailed microvascular reconstruction of normal and abnormal blood vessels and quantitative evaluation are advantages of OCTA analysis. OCTA can therefore non-invasively detect choroidal neovascularization that may complicate inflammatory disorders, and with remarkable depth-resolved capability, OCTA can identify and quantitate flow loss as a manifestation of ischemia and/or inflammation. The areas of flow deficit on OCTA at the level of the inner choroid often co-localize with hypofluorescent lesions with indocyanine green angiography. These regions of presumed choriocapillaris ischemia may occur in placoid disorders. Space-occupying granulomas may occur in disorders such as sarcoid and may or may not co-localize with choriocapillaris ischemia on ICG angiography. Blocking or shadowing artifacts should be excluded when evaluating inner choroidal abnormalities with OCT angiography. Fundus autofluorescence may assess the metabolic function of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the viability of the overlying photoreceptors and thus the activity of inflammation associated with uveitic lesions. The photoreceptors are physiologically maintained by the diffusion of oxygen from the choriocapillaris below and, to a lesser extent, from the deep retinal capillary plexus above. The depth-resolved capability of OCTA may therefore provide additional significant microvascular information about these vascular layers that may be driving the development of hyper-autofluorescent RPE inflammation and photoreceptor loss. The implementation of OCTA in the evaluation and management of uveitis disorders is being spurred by our greater knowledge and understanding of its application. In order to take full advantage of this exciting new imaging modality, however, uveitis specialists must understand the limitations of interpretation and potential artifact-related pitfalls in assessment and should continue to support evaluation with multimodal imaging to best optimize diagnoses and treatment of inflammatory diseases.