Emilian Marian Iovanovici

Mr. Emilian Marian Iovanovici


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cosmina-Mihaela RoscaCosmina-Mihaela Rosca
Cosmina-Mihaela Rosca
Adrian StancuAdrian Stancu
Adrian Stancu
EIEmilian Marian Iovanovici
Emilian Marian Iovanovici
The world is currently facing the issue of text authenticity in different areas. The implications of generated text can raise concerns about manipulation. When a photo of a celebrity is posted alongside an impactful message, it can generate outrage, hatred, or other manipulative beliefs. Numerous artificial intelligence tools use different techniques to determine whether a text is artificial intelligence-generated or authentic. However, these tools fail to accurately determine cases in which a text is written by a person who uses patterns specific to artificial intelligence tools. For these reasons, this article presents a new approach to the issue of deepfake texts. The authors propose methods to determine whether a text is associated with a specific person by using specific written patterns. Each person has their own written style, which can be identified in the average number of words, the average length of the words, the ratios of unique words, and the sentiments expressed in the sentences. These features are used to develop a custom-made written-style machine learning model named the custom deepfake text model. The model’s results show an accuracy of 99%, a precision of 97.83%, and a recall of 90%. A second model, the anomaly deepfake text model, determines whether the text is associated with a specific author. For this model, an attempt was made to determine anomalies at the level of textual characteristics that are assumed to be associated with particular patterns of a certain author. The results show an accuracy of 88.9%, a precision of 100%, and a recall of 89.9%. The findings outline the possibility of using the model to determine if a text is associated with a certain author. The paper positions itself as a starting point for identifying deepfakes at the text level.

6 August 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adrian StancuAdrian Stancu
Adrian Stancu
Cosmina-Mihaela RoscaCosmina-Mihaela Rosca
Cosmina-Mihaela Rosca
EIEmilian Marian Iovanovici
Emilian Marian Iovanovici
The increase in the elderly population globally reflects a change in the population’s mindset regarding preventive health measures and necessitates a rethinking of healthcare strategies. The integration of machine learning (ML)-type algorithms in geriatrics represents a direction for optimizing prevention, diagnosis, prediction, monitoring, and treatment. This paper presents a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 1 January 2020 and 31 May 2025. The paper is based on the applicability of ML techniques in the field of geriatrics. The study is conducted using the Web of Science database for a detailed discussion. The most studied algorithms in research articles are Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and support vector machines. They are preferred due to their performance in processing incomplete clinical data. The performance metrics reported in the analyzed papers include the accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, and Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Nine search categories are investigated through four databases: WOS, PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE. A comparative analysis shows that the field of geriatrics, through an ML approach in the context of elderly nutrition, is insufficiently explored, as evidenced by the 61 articles analyzed from the four databases. The analysis highlights gaps regarding the explainability of the models used, the transparency of cross-sectional datasets, and the validity of the data in real clinical contexts. The paper highlights the potential of ML models in transforming geriatrics within the context of personalized predictive care and outlines a series of future research directions, recommending the development of standardized databases, the integration of algorithmic explanations, the promotion of interdisciplinary collaborations, and the implementation of ethical norms of artificial intelligence in geriatric medical practice.