Maria Gavatha

Dr. Maria Gavatha


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2026 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEleni Polyzou
Eleni Polyzou
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
DEDimitrios Efthymiou
Dimitrios Efthymiou
DPDespoina Papageorgiou
Despoina Papageorgiou
ENEvangelia Ntalaki
Evangelia Ntalaki
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Bone infections, including osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, and fracture-related infections, represent a persistent and growing clinical problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Their management is complicated by limited bone vascularization, biofilm formation, intracellular bacterial persistence, dysregulated host immune responses and reduced antibiotic delivery to the infection site, which promote chronic infection and recurrence. The limitations of conventional treatment strategies based on surgical debridement and prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy, together with their association with antimicrobial resistance and systemic toxicity, have led to growing interest in alternative and adjunctive therapeutic approaches. Local antibiotic delivery systems, such as polymethyl methacrylate, calcium sulfate, hydroxyapatite-based composites, hydrogels, antibiotic-impregnated bone grafts, and nanoparticle carriers, enable high local antimicrobial concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure. From a different therapeutic perspective, immunomodulatory strategies, including mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies, cytokine-targeted interventions, bacteriophages, quorum-sensing inhibitors, and non-antibiotic antimicrobials, represent emerging approaches aimed at improving infection control and supporting bone regeneration. Advances in biomarker profiling, molecular diagnostics, and artificial intelligence-assisted analyses further support personalized approaches to diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Despite encouraging early results, clinical translation remains limited by methodological and regulatory challenges, underscoring the need for integrated, innovative treatment strategies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEleni Polyzou
Eleni Polyzou
ENEvangelia Ntalaki
Evangelia Ntalaki
DEDimitrios Efthymiou
Dimitrios Efthymiou
DPDespoina Papageorgiou
Despoina Papageorgiou
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Infective endocarditis (IE) during pregnancy, while uncommon, is associated with substantial maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality due to the complex physiological adaptations of pregnancy. Hemodynamic alterations, including increased cardiac output and changes in vascular resistance, combined with immunological modulation, predispose pregnant individuals to increased risk of infection and associated complications. Predominant pathogens implicated in pregnancy-associated IE are Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus viridans, and Enterococcus faecalis, with S. aureus infections frequently leading to poorer clinical outcomes. Diagnosis remains challenging due to commonly atypical presentation and relies on microbiological identification via blood cultures in conjunction with imaging modalities such as transthoracic echocardiography. IE in pregnancy is associated with increased maternal mortality rates (5–17%) and adverse fetal outcomes, including preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and fetal loss. Management necessitates careful selection of antimicrobial therapy to ensure efficacy while minimizing fetal toxicity, especially in settings of increased antimicrobial resistance. Anticoagulation and surgical interventions must be judiciously considered, with surgical timing individualized based on the severity of heart failure and coordinated multidisciplinary care. In conclusion, IE during pregnancy constitutes a significant clinical challenge, underscoring the need for enhanced diagnostic strategies, optimized therapeutic protocols, and the development of pregnancy-specific management guidelines to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

23 June 2025 in Microbiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDespoina Papageorgiou
Despoina Papageorgiou
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
DEDimitrios Efthymiou
Dimitrios Efthymiou
EPEleni Polyzou
Eleni Polyzou
ATAristotelis Tsiakalos
Aristotelis Tsiakalos
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Respiratory tract infections are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The growing incidence of antimicrobial resistance among the causative pathogens exerts sustained pressure on the existing therapeutic options. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance limits the treatment options and often leads to unfavorable patient outcomes. However, in the past few years, newly developed antibiotics have become available, providing viable choices for antibiotic-resistant infections. New β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/relebactam, are effective against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Several new drugs including ceftolozane/tazobactam are active against multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while sulbactam/durlobactam and cefiderocol have potent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. A number of new options, such as lefamulin, omadacycline, and delafloxacin, have also emerged for pathogens commonly associated with community acquired pneumonia. This article aims to review the characteristics of newly approved antibiotics for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, as well as to discuss some investigational agents that are currently under development.

8 April 2025
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
EPEleni Polyzou
Eleni Polyzou
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
DPDespoina Papageorgiou
Despoina Papageorgiou
Francesk MulitaFrancesk Mulita
Francesk Mulita
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Perianal abscesses constitute a common perianal infection frequently encountered in emergency medical settings. Their development is influenced by several predisposing factors, including inflammatory bowel disease, smoking, and HIV infection, with peak incidence typically observed in individuals around the age of 40. The pathogenesis of perianal abscesses is attributed to obstruction of the ducts of the anal glands, which facilitates bacterial proliferation and subsequent inflammation. Anatomically, perianal abscesses are classified into ischiorectal, intersphincteric, supralevator, and perianal; the latter being the most frequently encountered. The predominant clinical manifestation is localized perianal pain, although systemic symptoms may also be present. While medical history and physical examination are generally sufficient for diagnosing uncomplicated perianal abscesses, imaging modalities should be employed in cases with atypical presentations, suspected occult supralevator abscesses, complex anal fistulas, or perianal Crohn’s disease. The primary treatment for perianal abscesses is surgical incision and drainage. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for patients with specific comorbidities, in accordance with current clinical guidelines. Antibiotic therapy is generally reserved for cases complicated by cellulitis, systemic infection, or immunosuppression, with empiric antimicrobial regimens determined based on patient risk stratification and local antimicrobial resistance patterns. Although perianal abscesses are considered benign, their clinical course is complicated by variable rates of recurrence and fistula formation. Therefore, patients undergoing drainage procedures require meticulous follow-up and close clinical monitoring to identify and manage potential complications effectively.

10 December 2025 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEleni Polyzou
Eleni Polyzou
ENEvangelia Ntalaki
Evangelia Ntalaki
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), although traditionally viewed as a sexually transmitted infection (STI), can also result from non-sexually transmitted microorganisms that display distinct epidemiologic and clinical characteristics. Unlike STI-related PID, these infections are less influenced by sexual behavior, often show a bimodal age distribution, and are linked to bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated dysbiosis, iatrogenic uterine procedures, postpartum states, or inadequate access to timely screening and care. Non-STI-related PID is usually polymicrobial, predominantly involving BV-associated vaginal, enteric, or urinary commensals that ascend into the upper genital tract, while respiratory tract organisms, mycobacteria, and biofilm-associated pathogens may also play a role. Pathophysiological mechanisms include disruption of the endocervical barrier, mucus degradation, biofilm formation, hematogenous or iatrogenic seeding, and chronic cytokine-mediated inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic/subclinical disease to acute pelvic pain and tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) and can progress to systemic infection and sepsis. Diagnosing non-STI PID is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, negative STI tests, and inconclusive imaging findings, while management relies on broad-spectrum antimicrobials with surgery as needed. Given these complexities, this review aims to synthesize current knowledge on non-STI-related PID, clarify key considerations for its diagnosis, management, and prevention, and outline future perspectives to improve clinical outcomes.

26 June 2026 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMaria Gavatha
Maria Gavatha
ARAngelos Emmanouil Rigopoulos
Angelos Emmanouil Rigopoulos
Miranda maria AlexopoulouMiranda maria Alexopoulou
Miranda maria Alexopoulou
Vasilis PetrakisVasilis Petrakis
Vasilis Petrakis
NBNikoleta Babaka
Nikoleta Babaka
KAKarolina Akinosoglou
Karolina Akinosoglou
Oral manifestations are common in people living with HIV (PLWH) and may affect oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), while data from Greece remain limited. This multicenter prospective cohort study evaluated oral health status and OHRQoL among PLWH and explored associations with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and clinical factors. Overall, 370 PLWH from seven referral centers were included. Participants underwent oral examination, with oral hygiene assessed using the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), and completed the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v29.0, while multinomial and binary logistic regression identified predictors of oral hygiene status and OHRQoL, respectively. Most participants were male (76.5%), had CD4 counts ≥ 200 cells/μL (95.4%), and were receiving ART (98.6%). Annual dental check-ups, daily tooth brushing, mouthwash use, and dental floss use were reported by 54.1%, 69.5%, 31.9%, and 23.8%, respectively. The median OHI-S score was 2.0 (IQR:1.5–2.7), with 16.9% having poor OHI-S; the median OHIP-14 score was 11 (IQR: 7–15), with 64.4% reporting poor OHRQoL. Male sex was associated with lower odds of poor OHRQoL (OR = 0.377; p = 0.006), whereas ART regimen independently predicted poor OHRQoL. These findings support patient-centered oral healthcare within HIV care.