Holly Olson

Dr. Holly Olson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2020 in Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HOHolly Olson
Holly Olson
DTDena Towner
Dena Towner
MHMark Hiraoka
Mark Hiraoka
MSMichael Savala
Michael Savala
IZIvica Zalud
Ivica Zalud
COVID-19 pandemic is changing profoundly the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) academic clinical learning environment in many different ways. Rapid developments affecting our learners, patients, faculty and staff require unprecedented collaboration and quick, deeply consequential readjustments, almost on a daily basis. We summarized here our experiences, opportunities, challenges and lessons learned and outline how to move forward. The COVID-19 pandemic taught us there is a clear need for collaboration in implementing the most current evidence-based medicine, rapidly assess and improve the everchanging healthcare environment by problem solving and “how to” instead of “should we” approach. In addition, as a community with very limited resources we have to rely heavily on internal expertise, ingenuity and innovation. The key points to succeed are efficient and timely communication, transparency in decision making and reengagement. As time continues to pass, it is certain that more lessons will emerge.

12 December 2025 in International Medical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HOHolly Olson
Holly Olson
MDMelodee Deutsch
Melodee Deutsch
CKChad Kawakami
Chad Kawakami
AMAlison Miyasaki
Alison Miyasaki
STSheri Tokumaru
Sheri Tokumaru
LWLorrie C. K. Wong
Lorrie C. K. Wong
Background: Patient safety through root cause analyses and action planning (RCA2) is often taught in healthcare system-specific formats, in ways that are not applicable to interprofessional teams. The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate an interprofessional RCA2 simulation conducted via videoconferencing, where attendees used cause mapping to identify root causes. Methods: Educators from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy schools developed the curriculum. Sessions included residents from graduate medical education programs, senior nursing students, and pharmacy residents. Facilitators provided brief didactics, and the simulation reviewed a safety event, root cause analysis, development of action plans, and a formal debrief session. Google Suite tools were used to create a cause map and action plan. Participants completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS), facilitators conducted after-action reviews, and survey responses were used for quality improvement. Results: Most participants found this simulation helpful. There were significant improvements in self-perception of skills in the six ICCAS domains. Participants also noted that learning RCA would be helpful in their future practice. Conclusions: This patient safety simulation in an interprofessional team environment helped participants develop teamwork and an understanding of the RCA2 process. Participants learned to ask clarifying questions and voice concerns, which is essential when identifying root causes. This process serves as a guide for teaching these skills. Future iterations can implement this simulation-based RCA and adapt it for other, diverse populations.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKelsi Chan
Kelsi Chan
HOHolly Olson
Holly Olson
MNMelissa Natavio
Melissa Natavio
PSParis N Stowers
Paris N Stowers
Over the past decade, telehealth provision of care has become increasingly common. This shift away from in-person clinics may impact the experience of medical learners and the preceptors who train them. This study aimed to measure and compare obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians’ perceived quality of educational feedback during telemedicine compared to in-person clinical encounters. This prospective observational study recruited residents enrolled in a family planning clinical rotation at an academic residency program. After every in-person and telemedicine clinic session from January 2021 to February 2022, participating residents were sent a link to a 3 min survey via text message. Ordinal regression modeling was used to compare Likert responses between the telehealth and in-person clinical settings. All nine residents enrolled in the clinical rotation chose to participate in this study and responded to 114 of 132 survey prompts (86%). Participants positively rated the feedback they received during all clinic sessions. When comparing the two clinic experiences, there was no statistically significant difference in perceived quality of feedback or satisfaction with feedback. Residents’ perception of educational feedback during telemedicine clinic is at least similar for most measures and superior for contraception counseling when compared to an in-person clinic.