Steven A. Hillyard

Dr. Steven A. Hillyard


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 February 1998 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
LALourdes Anllo-Vento
Lourdes Anllo-Vento
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) provide high-resolution measures of the time course of neuronal activity patterns associated with perceptual and cognitive processes. New techniques for ERP source analysis and comparisons with data from blood-flow neuroimaging studies enable improved localization of cortical activity during visual selective attention. ERP modulations during spatial attention point toward a mechanism of gain control over information flow in extrastriate visual cortical pathways, starting about 80 ms after stimulus onset. Paying attention to nonspatial features such as color, motion, or shape is manifested by qualitatively different ERP patterns in multiple cortical areas that begin with latencies of 100–150 ms. The processing of nonspatial features seems to be contingent upon the prior selection of location, consistent with early selection theories of attention and with the hypothesis that spatial attention is “special.”

1 May 2003 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFrancesco Di Russo
Francesco Di Russo
AMAntigona Martínez
Antigona Martínez
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
Recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs) were combined with structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the spatio-temporal patterns of cortical activity that underlie visual–spatial attention. Small checkerboard stimuli were flashed in random order to the four quadrants of the visual field at a rapid rate while subjects attended to stimuli in one quadrant at a time. Attended stimuli elicited enhanced ERP components in the latency range 80–200 ms that were co-localized with fMRI activations in multiple extrastriate cortical regions. The earliest ERP component (C1 at 50–90 ms) was unaffected by attention and was localized by dipole modeling to calcarine cortex. A longer latency deflection in the 150–225 ms range that was accounted for by this same calcarine source, however, did show consistent modulation with attention. This late attention effect, like the C1, inverted in polarity for upper versus lower field stimuli, consistent with a neural generator in primary visual cortex (area V1). These results provide support to current hypotheses that spatial attention in humans is associated with delayed feedback to area V1 from higher extrastriate areas that may have the function of improving the salience of stimuli at attended locations.

11 April 2007 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJyoti Mishra
Jyoti Mishra
AMAntigona Martinez
Antigona Martinez
TSTerrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
When a single flash of light is presented interposed between two brief auditory stimuli separated by 60–100 ms, subjects typically report perceiving two flashes (Shams et al., 2000, 2002). We investigated the timing and localization of the cortical processes that underlie this illusory flash effect in 34 subjects by means of 64-channel recordings of event-related potentials (ERPs). A difference ERP calculated to isolate neural activity associated with the illusory second flash revealed an early modulation of visual cortex activity at 30–60 ms after the second sound, which was larger in amplitude in subjects who saw the illusory flash more frequently. These subjects also showed this early modulation in response to other combinations of auditory and visual stimuli, thus pointing to consistent individual differences in the neural connectivity that underlies cross-modal integration. The overall pattern of cortical activity associated with the cross-modally induced illusory flash, however, differed markedly from that evoked by a real second flash. A trial-by-trial analysis showed that short-latency ERP activity localized to auditory cortex and polymodal cortex of the temporal lobe, concurrent with gamma bursts in visual cortex, were associated with perception of the double-flash illusion. These results provide evidence that perception of the illusory second flash is based on a very rapid dynamic interplay between auditory and visual cortical areas that is triggered by the second sound.

1 April 1998 in Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
WTWolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi
Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi
TMThomas F Münte
Thomas F Münte

29 December 2009 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSViola S. Störmer
Viola S. Störmer
JMJohn McDonald
John McDonald
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
The question of whether attention makes sensory impressions appear more intense has been a matter of debate for over a century. Recent psychophysical studies have reported that attention increases apparent contrast of visual stimuli, but the issue continues to be debated. We obtained converging neurophysiological evidence from human observers as they judged the relative contrast of visual stimuli presented to the left and right visual fields following a lateralized auditory cue. Cross-modal cueing of attention boosted the apparent contrast of the visual target in association with an enlarged neural response in the contralateral visual cortex that began within 100 ms after target onset. The magnitude of the enhanced neural response was positively correlated with perceptual reports of the cued target being higher in contrast. The results suggest that attention increases the perceived contrast of visual stimuli by boosting early sensory processing in the visual cortex.

5 September 2003 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSM. A. Schoenfeld
M. A. Schoenfeld
CTC. Tempelmann
C. Tempelmann
AMA. Martinez
A. Martinez
JHJ.-M. Hopf
J.-M. Hopf
CSC. Sattler
C. Sattler
SHSteven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard
Objects in the environment may be attended selectively and perceived as unified ensembles of their constituent features. To investigate the timing and cortical localization of feature-integration mechanisms in object-based attention, recordings of event-related potentials and magnetic fields were combined with functional MRI while subjects attended to one of two superimposed transparent surfaces formed by arrays of dots moving in opposite directions. A spatiotemporal analysis revealed evidence for a rapid increase in neural activity localized to a color-selective region of the fusiform gyrus when the surface moving in the attended direction displayed an irrelevant color feature. These data provide support for the “integrated-competition” model of object-selective attention and point to a dynamic neural substrate for the rapid binding process that links relevant and irrelevant features to form a unified perceptual object.