Todd William Mudd

Dr. Todd William Mudd

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 March 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OJOmer Jamy
Omer Jamy
GBGarrett Bourne
Garrett Bourne
TMTodd William Mudd
Todd William Mudd
HTHaley Thigpen
Haley Thigpen
RBRavi Bhatia
Ravi Bhatia
In recent years, the practice of routinely obtaining day 14 bone marrow biopsies during AML intensive induction therapy has been scrutinized. While current guidelines recommend obtaining mid-induction biopsies to gauge early response to treatment and guide potential changes in future management, concerns have been raised that these biopsies may not be as prognostically accurate as hoped and subsequently may result in additional and unwarranted chemotherapy toxicity in select patients. In this review, our goal is to summarize the most recent evidence surrounding day 14 bone marrow biopsies that have been published and clarify the utility of this currently recommended practice. Here, we review major developments in mid-induction biopsy in AML, along with ongoing and future planned studies in this area, outlining the limitations of available data and our future goals.

22 July 2025 in Leukemia Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTodd William Mudd
Todd William Mudd
KDKendall Diebold
Kendall Diebold
KPKatherine Parks
Katherine Parks
MHMaris Hardee
Maris Hardee
JJJay Jarodiya
Jay Jarodiya
OJOmer Jamy
Omer Jamy

6 August 2026 in Blood Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHaley Thigpen
Haley Thigpen
KDKendall Diebold
Kendall Diebold
TMTodd William Mudd
Todd William Mudd
MHMaris Hardee
Maris Hardee
MEManuel Espinoza-Gutarra
Manuel Espinoza-Gutarra
OJOmer Jamy
Omer Jamy

3 June 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTodd William Mudd
Todd William Mudd
KDKendall Diebold
Kendall Diebold
SRSravanti Rangaraju
Sravanti Rangaraju
ASAditi Sharma
Aditi Sharma
KBKimo Bachiashvili
Kimo Bachiashvili
OJOmer Jamy
Omer Jamy
Background: Post-remission cytarabine consolidation is a cornerstone of therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the optimal dosing strategy in older adults (≥60 years) remains unclear. High-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) is often avoided due to toxicity concerns, and data guiding cumulative dosing are limited. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 111 patients aged ≥60 years with AML who achieved complete remission after standard 7 + 3 induction and received at least one cycle of cytarabine consolidation between 2012 and 2024. A 90-day landmark analysis excluded early relapses or deaths. Results: The median age was 65 years; 41% proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Cytarabine consolidation was well tolerated, with no neurotoxicity and only one instance of reversible nephrotoxicity. Patients were stratified by median cumulative cytarabine dose into low-intensity (<18 g/m2, LIC) and high-intensity (≥18 g/m2, HIC) groups. HIC was associated with improved overall survival compared with LIC (median OS: 31 vs. 13 months, p = 0.02), particularly among non-transplanted patients (25 vs. 7 months, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, HIC (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.82, p = 0.01) and allo-SCT (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44–0.79, p = 0.03) independently predicted superior survival. Conclusions: Higher cumulative cytarabine consolidation is safe, feasible, and associated with improved survival in older AML patients, especially among patients ineligible for transplant. Prospective studies are warranted to define the optimal dosing strategy in this population.