Background: Chronic pain and early cognitive decline, which are costly to treat and highly prevalent among older adults, commonly co-occur, exacerbate one another over time, and can accelerate the development and progression of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. We developed the first mind-body activity program (Active Brains [AB]) tailored to the needs of older adults with chronic pain and early cognitive decline. Results from our previous study strongly supported the feasibility of conducting AB remotely and provided evidence for improvements in outcomes. Objective: We are conducting a single-blinded, National Institutes of Health stage-2, randomized clinical trial to establish the efficacy of AB versus a time-matched and dose-matched education control (Health Enhancement Program [HEP]) in improving self-reported and objective outcomes of physical, cognitive, and emotional functions in 260 participants. The methodology described in this paper was informed by the lessons learned from the first year of the trial. Methods: Participants are identified and recruited through multidisciplinary clinician–referred individuals (eg, pain psychologists and geriatricians), the Rally Research platform, social media, and community partnerships. Interested participants complete eligibility screening and electronic informed consent. Baseline assessments include self-report, performance-based measures (eg, 6-min walk test) and objective measures (eg, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status). Participants are mailed a wrist-worn ActiGraph device (ActiGraph LLC) to passively monitor objective function (eg, steps) during the week between the baseline assessment and the beginning of the programs, which they continue to wear throughout the programs. After baseline assessments, participants are randomized to either AB or HEP and complete 8 weekly, remote, group sessions with a Massachusetts General Hospital psychologist. The AB group receives a Fitbit (Fitbit Inc) to help reinforce increased activity. Assessments are repeated after the intervention and at the 6-month follow-up. Coprimary outcomes include multimodal physical function (self-report, performance based, and objective). Secondary outcomes are cognitive function (self-report and objective), emotional function, and pain. Results: We began recruitment in July 2022 and recruited 37 participants across 4 cohorts. Of them, all (n=37, 100%) have completed the baseline assessment, 26 (70%) have completed the posttest assessment, and 9 (24%) are actively enrolled in the intervention (total dropout: n=2, 5%). In the three cohorts (26/37, 70%) that have completed the AB or HEP, 26 (100%) participants completed all 8 group sessions (including minimal makeups), and watch adherence (1937/2072, 93.48%, average across ActiGraph and Fitbit devices) has been excellent. The fourth cohort is ongoing (9/37, 24%), and we plan to complete enrollment by March 2026. Conclusions: We aim to establish the efficacy of the AB program over a time-matched and dose-matched control in a live video-based trial and test the mechanisms through theoretically driven mediators and moderators. Findings will inform the development of a future multisite effectiveness-implementation trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05373745; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05373745 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47319

Background/Objectives: Childhood trauma is associated with psychiatric sequelae beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including eating disorders (EDs) and cognitive dysfunction. While eating pathology is related to cognition irrespective of childhood trauma exposure, such experiences may influence the way in which these symptoms develop. One method that has garnered increased interest in studying the interrelationships between symptoms and pinpointing core features of psychopathology is network analysis. Methods: Using data from the Nathan Kline Institute Rockland Sample, the present study utilized network analysis to examine associations between ED symptoms and cognitive deficits among a community sample. Comorbidity networks were constructed in two samples: adult reporters of childhood trauma (n = 116) and non-reporters (n = 101). Results: In line with the cognitive-behavioral model of EDs, overvaluation of weight/shape was central to both networks but demonstrated higher strength centrality among trauma reporters. Additionally, among trauma reporters, executive functioning deficits were linked to food-related attentional biases; alternatively, affective symptoms were salient among non-reporters. Finally, negative self-concept (theorized as a putative consequence of cognitive deficits) was implicated in both networks. When comparing the networks according to global strength, we did not find significant differences. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to the literature examining the interrelatedness of eating pathology and cognition and extend these findings by considering the role of trauma exposure. While our networks shared features of overvaluation of weight/shape and negative self-concept, they differed according to cognitive-affective concomitants. This information holds clinical utility in advancing assessment and intervention for individuals with eating psychopathology.

BACKGROUND Chronic pain and early cognitive decline, which are costly to treat and highly prevalent among older adults, commonly co-occur, exacerbate one another over time, and can accelerate the development and progression of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. We developed the first mind-body activity program (Active Brains [AB]) tailored to the needs of older adults with chronic pain and early cognitive decline. Results from our previous study strongly supported the feasibility of conducting AB remotely and provided evidence for improvements in outcomes. OBJECTIVE We are conducting a single-blinded, National Institutes of Health stage-2, randomized clinical trial to establish the efficacy of AB versus a time-matched and dose-matched education control (Health Enhancement Program [HEP]) in improving self-reported and objective outcomes of physical, cognitive, and emotional functions in 260 participants. The methodology described in this paper was informed by the lessons learned from the first year of the trial. METHODS Participants are identified and recruited through multidisciplinary clinician–referred individuals (eg, pain psychologists and geriatricians), the Rally Research platform, social media, and community partnerships. Interested participants complete eligibility screening and electronic informed consent. Baseline assessments include self-report, performance-based measures (eg, 6-min walk test) and objective measures (eg, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status). Participants are mailed a wrist-worn ActiGraph device (ActiGraph LLC) to passively monitor objective function (eg, steps) during the week between the baseline assessment and the beginning of the programs, which they continue to wear throughout the programs. After baseline assessments, participants are randomized to either AB or HEP and complete 8 weekly, remote, group sessions with a Massachusetts General Hospital psychologist. The AB group receives a Fitbit (Fitbit Inc) to help reinforce increased activity. Assessments are repeated after the intervention and at the 6-month follow-up. Coprimary outcomes include multimodal physical function (self-report, performance based, and objective). Secondary outcomes are cognitive function (self-report and objective), emotional function, and pain. RESULTS We began recruitment in July 2022 and recruited 37 participants across 4 cohorts. Of them, all (n=37, 100%) have completed the baseline assessment, 26 (70%) have completed the posttest assessment, and 9 (24%) are actively enrolled in the intervention (total dropout: n=2, 5%). In the three cohorts (26/37, 70%) that have completed the AB or HEP, 26 (100%) participants completed all 8 group sessions (including minimal makeups), and watch adherence (1937/2072, 93.48%, average across ActiGraph and Fitbit devices) has been excellent. The fourth cohort is ongoing (9/37, 24%), and we plan to complete enrollment by March 2026. CONCLUSIONS We aim to establish the efficacy of the AB program over a time-matched and dose-matched control in a live video-based trial and test the mechanisms through theoretically driven mediators and moderators. Findings will inform the development of a future multisite effectiveness-implementation trial. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05373745; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05373745 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/47319

Objectives: Rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among older adults range from 0.4%–4.5%. Research examining PTSD in adults has demonstrated numerous associations between physical and mental health conditions; however, these are less well characterized in older adults. The current study aimed to identify base rates of such conditions among older adults with and without a history of PTSD. Method: In a case control design using the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set, adults 65 years or older from the United States who endorsed either the presence or absence of PTSD were matched by age to assess between-group differences (N = 472; 236 pairs). We examined differences across self-reported sociodemographics and physical health, mental health, and substance use histories. Results: More participants with a history of PTSD identified as Hispanic, non-white, non-married, and functionally independent. Compared to individuals without a history of PTSD, significantly more individuals with a history of PTSD had histories of depression, anxiety, substance abuse, Parkinson’s disease, seizures, insomnia, and TBI. Among participants without PTSD history, only 14.7% reported a history of TBI, compared to 41.1% of individuals with PTSD history. Conclusions: Findings showed expected trends toward worse physical and mental health among older adults with self-reported PTSD. There was a striking difference in the frequency of TBI history between participants with and without PTSD. These findings underscore a need to assess for PTSD among older adults, particularly those reporting a history of TBI.