Ana Jeromen Peressutti

Dr. Ana Jeromen Peressutti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 March 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAjra Secerov Ermenc
Ajra Secerov Ermenc
PPPrimoz Peterlin
Primoz Peterlin
VVVaneja Velenik
Vaneja Velenik
APAna Jeromen Peressutti
Ana Jeromen Peressutti
JBJasna But-Hadzic
Jasna But-Hadzic
BŠBarbara Šegedin
Barbara Šegedin
Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate interobserver variability in the determination of the primary tumor for radiotherapy treatment planning in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Sixteen patients with locally advanced ESCC were included in the analysis. In all patients positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PETC/CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans for radiotherapy planning were performed. Five experienced radiation oncologists delineated the primary tumor based on CT alone, MR alone, PET/CT, CT with fused MR and PET/CT with fused MR. Mean tumor volumes were calculated for each patient and imaging modality. The generalized conformity index (CIgen) was calculated to assess agreement in tumor determination. Results: The mean tumor volumes and CIgen for CT alone, MR alone, PET/CT, CT with fused MR and PET/CT with fused MR were 33.1 cm3, 30.2 cm3, 38.1 cm3, 31.9 cm3, 36.2 cm3 and 0.59, 0.64, 0.66, 0.63, 0.71, respectively. CIgen was significantly higher using PET/CT with fused MR compared to CT (p < 0.001) and PET/CT (p = 0.002) and using PET/CT compared to CT (alone) (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our study showed higher agreement in primary tumor determination in ESCC using PET/CT compared to CT alone. Higher agreement was also found using PET/CT with fused MR compared to CT alone and PET/CT.

9 April 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRManuel Ramanović
Manuel Ramanović
FAFranc Anderluh
Franc Anderluh
APAna Jeromen Peressutti
Ana Jeromen Peressutti
PKPetar Korošec
Petar Korošec
IOIrena Oblak
Irena Oblak
VVVaneja Velenik
Vaneja Velenik
Background/Objectives: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), integrating systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery or surveillance, has become a standard approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, optimal sequencing strategies and long-term outcomes of watch-and-wait (W&W) following sandwich TNT remain insufficiently characterized. We evaluated oncologic outcomes and treatment response in patients treated with an institutional sandwich TNT protocol. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with LARC treated with sandwich TNT (induction chemotherapy followed by hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost [IMRT-SIB] chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy) at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between 2016 and 2023. The primary endpoint was an overall complete response (CR; pathological [pCR] and clinical [cCR]). Secondary endpoints included tumor regression grade (TRG), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, organ preservation, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Among 205 patients (median age 61 years), overall CR was 29.5% (pCR 19.3% and cCR 10.2%). Major pathological response (TRG 3–4) occurred in 37.6%. R0 resection was achieved in 94.5%. In the W&W cohort (n = 21), local regrowth occurred in 33.3% (95% CI, 14.6–57.0%) over a median follow-up of 4.96 years. Total mesorectal excision (TME)-free survival at 5 years was 73.1% (95% CI, 55.0–97.2%). Estimated 5-year OS was 81.1% (95% CI, 75.5–87.2%) and 5-year DFS was 75.2% (95% CI, 69.0–82.0). In multivariable analysis, non-R0 resection (HR 6.06, 95% CI, 1.99–18.42), MRI circumferential resection margin positivity (HR 3.11, 95% CI, 1.53–6.33), and MRI extramural vascular invasion positivity (HR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.05–3.91) remained independent predictors of DFS. Conclusions: Institutional sandwich TNT yields meaningful tumor response and durable survival in MRI-defined high-risk LARC. Structured W&W offers organ preservation with acceptable oncologic control under intensive surveillance.

12 March 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MRManuel Ramanović
Manuel Ramanović
FAFranc Anderluh
Franc Anderluh
APAna Jeromen Peressutti
Ana Jeromen Peressutti
PKPetar Korošec
Petar Korošec
IOIrena Oblak
Irena Oblak
VVVaneja Velenik
Vaneja Velenik
Background/Objectives: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), integrating systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery or surveillance, has become a standard approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, optimal sequencing strategies and long-term outcomes of watch-and-wait (W&W) following sandwich TNT remain insufficiently characterized. We evaluated oncologic outcomes and treatment response in patients treated with an institutional sandwich TNT protocol. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with LARC treated with sandwich TNT (induction chemotherapy followed by hypofrac-tionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost [IMRT-SIB] chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy) at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana between 2016 and 2023. The primary endpoint was an overall complete response (CR; pathological [pCR] and clinical [cCR]). Secondary endpoints included tumor regression grade (TRG), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resec-tion rate, organ preservation, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Among 205 patients (median age 61 years), overall CR was 29.5% (pCR 19.3% and cCR 10.2%). Major pathological response (TRG 3–4) occurred in 37.6%. R0 resec-tion was achieved in 94.5%. In the W&W cohort (n=21), local regrowth occurred in 33.3% (95% CI 14.6–57.0%) over a median follow-up of 4.96 years. Surgery-free sur-vival at 5 years was 73.1% (95% CI 55.0–97.2%). Estimated five-year OS was 81.1% (95% CI 75.5–87.2%) and 5-year DFS was 75.2% (95% CI 69.0–82.0%). In multivariable analysis, non-R0 resection (HR 6.06), MRI circumferential resection margin positivity (HR 3.11), and extramural vascular invasion positivity (HR 1.97) remained independ-ent predictors of DFS. Conclusions: Sandwich TNT yields meaningful tumor response and durable survival in MRI-defined high-risk LARC. Structured W&W offers organ preservation with acceptable oncologic control under intensive surveillance.