We read with great interest the original article by Brant et al.
1 x 1 Brant, S.R. et al. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152: 206–217 Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (23) | Google Scholar See all References The discovery of African American (AA)-specific loci and loci that are shared between ethnic groups highlight the importance of studying inflammatory bowel disease in other populations apart from Europeans for a unique insight into the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. The challenges with studying populations of non-European ancestry remains one of terminology. The main drawback is that the difference between race and ethnicity is not clearly defined in most studies. Further discrepancies arise when considering the genetic background. For instance the African American race, is collectively grouped as one, irrespective of the country of origin reflecting different genetic backgrounds. It is not surprising that phenotype studies in Hispanic
2 x 2 Damas, O.M. et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 231–239 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (32) | Google Scholar See all References and South Asians populations
3 x 3 Jayanthi, V. et al. Digestion. 1992; 52: 34–42 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (19) | Google Scholar See all References have previously shown discordant results as the groups consist of a heterogenous population. “Hispanics” refers to people from Mexico, Cuba, and Puerto Rico and reflects a social construct rather than common genetic background. Similarly, South Asians encompass a broad population from different genetic backgrounds to include India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Clearer descriptors are needed to incorporate genetic as well as ethnic aspects of these groups as both influence disease expression. So although the authors describe the potential for identifying risk prediction for AA, this may not be applicable to all patients as the term reflects a broad racial group and ignores genetic origin and ethnic factors.