COVID-19 vaccination rates have increased since distribution began in December 2020. However, in some states, such as South Carolina, getting people to take the vaccine has been challenging; as of spring 2022, slightly less than 60% of the total population is fully vaccinated. Vaccine hesitancy among Black Americans may be explained by several factors, including lack of confidence in the medical establishment and vaccines in particular. Faith-based leaders, such as pastors, can make a difference. This study explores the communication strategies that pastors in predominantly Black churches use to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates among churchgoers and the surrounding community. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 pastors in South Carolina. The main themes that emerged are: (1) using various communication channels to ensure access; (2) representing a trusted source of information; (3) offering a role model for vaccination—leading by example; and (4) strengthening the commitment to health. As the need for COVID-19 vaccination continues, including booster vaccines, pastors can provide accurate information and community outreach to promote the health of Black communities.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common non-cancer cause of death among cancer survivors. Lifestyle and clinical factors associated with cancer mortality are also associated with cardiovascular mortality. The American Heart Association (AHA) has termed these factors “cardiovascular health” (CVH), using Life’s Simple 7 (LS7) or “Life’s Essential 8 (LE8)” to determine poor, intermediate, and high (ideal) CVH. Further, less than ideal CVH is associated with higher cancer mortality. Yet, CVH among cancer survivors remains understudied. This systematic review examined the extant literature, providing a comprehensive report of the findings addressing CVH among cancer survivors. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically examined CVH among cancer survivors (including patients) within PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase databases without date limitations from June 2024 to December 2024 using the following keywords: “cancer survivors”, “cancer patient”, “cardiovascular health”, and “cardiovascular risk factors”. Two reviewers independently accessed articles in concordance with LS7 and LE8 metrics. The included studies were examined and assessed for risk of bias and synthesized to elucidate themes of CVH among cancer survivors. Results: We retrieved 2935 studies examining breast, gynecological, endometrial, prostate, colon, lung, lymphoma, and skin cancer survivors published from 2002–2024. Overall, 10 studies met criteria utilizing LS7 or LE8 CVH health outcomes (4 LS7, 5 LE8, and 1 LS7/LE8), ages 40–70 years, with a population (n = 35,980) consisting of mostly female, non-Black individuals; mean survivorship was 7.2 years. Four themes emerged: CVH outcomes among cancer survivors, social factors impacting CVH outcomes, associations of CVH, and other health outcomes opportunities for CVH awareness. Conclusions: We found that cancer survivors frequently report less than ideal CVH outcomes and would benefit from education/empowerment to support lifestyle changes that improve CVH.

The purpose of this study was to explore whether patient-centered communication (PCC) would partially mediate the relationship between social support and mental health status among adult survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Secondary analysis of self-administered questionnaires mailed to 682 adults with NHL who were assumed living and had completed the baseline 2005 study (83% response rate). Adult NHL survivors (n = 566) and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Sobel test. Results: PCC partially mediated the relationship between social support and three measures of mental health outcomes (SF-36 Mental Component Summary [SF36-MCS], Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version [PCL-C], Impact of Cancer – Negative Impact Summary [IOCv2 NIS]). Results of the conservative Sobel test were significant (p < .01) in three mediation models. Conclusions: Future research should focus on testing interventions that target PCC and identifying additional mediators and moderators between social support and mental health outcomes among cancer survivors.

Church leaders have used scripture to encourage congregants to reflect on their health choices. Still, this study focuses on Black pastors who used other approaches to prompt awareness about COVID-19 and vaccination. The purpose of the study is to explore how Black posters use medical information and scripture to discuss COVID-19 vaccination within the communities they serve. This study uses a phenomenological design; ten Black pastors in South Carolina were recruited through snowball sampling to learn about their information dissemination practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study describes their rhetoric, foregrounding medical facts and supporting them with biblical passages. The pastors who participated in semi-structured interviews presented scientific information to the church community and encouraged members to "follow the science.” Two central themes emerged from the study: 1) Stand by the science to educate the Black community about COVID-19 vaccines, and 2) Balancing science and scripture to reinforce positive COVID-19 vaccine messaging. The study's implication demonstrates how Black pastors are instrumental in providing a narrative of factual health information in a spiritual setting.