Introduction: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is an emerging problem in critically ill patients and the prevalence and risk factors are unclear in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This multicenter prospective observational study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of PICS in ventilated patients with COVID-19 after ICU discharge. Methods: Questionnaires were administered twice in surviving patients with COVID-19 who had required mechanical ventilation, concerning Barthel Index, Short-Memory Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores. The risk factors for PICS were examined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The first and second PICS surveys were obtained at 5.5 and 13.5 months (mean) after ICU discharge, with 251 and 209 patients completing the questionnaires and with a prevalence of PICS of 58.6% and 60.8%, respectively, along with the highest percentages of cognitive impairment. Delirium (with an odds ratio of (OR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.1–4.9, and p = 0.03) and the duration of mechanical ventilation (with an OR of 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.58, and p = 0.02) were independently identified as the risk factors for PICS in the first PICS survey. Conclusion: Approximately 60% of the ventilated patients with COVID-19 experienced persistent PICS, especially delirium, and required longer mechanical ventilation.

Background: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) affects the quality of life (QOL) of survivors of critical illness. Although PICS persists for a long time, the longitudinal changes in each component and their interrelationships over time both remain unclear. This multicenter prospective study investigated the 2-year trajectory of PICS and its components as well as factors contributing to deterioration or recovery in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and also attempted to identify possible countermeasures. Methods: Patients who survived COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation completed questionnaires on the Barthel index, Short-Memory Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level every six months over a two-year period. Scores were weighted to account for dropouts, and the trajectory of each functional impairment was evaluated with alluvial diagrams. The prevalence of PICS and factors impairing or restoring function were examined using generalized estimating equations considering trajectories. Results: Among 334 patients, PICS prevalence rates in the four completed questionnaires were 72.1, 78.5, 77.6, and 82.0%, with cognitive impairment being the most common and lower QOL being noted when multiple impairments coexisted. Physical function and QOL indicated that many patients exhibited consistent trends of either recovery or deterioration. In contrast, cognitive function and mental health revealed considerable variability, with many patients showing fluctuating ratings in the later surveys. Delirium was associated with worse physical and mental health and poor QOL, while prolonged ventilation was associated with poor QOL. Living with family was associated with the recovery of all functions and QOL, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was associated with the recovery of cognitive function and mental health. Conclusions: Critically ill patients had PICS for a long period and followed different trajectories for each impairment component. Based on trajectories, known PICS risk factors such as prolonged ventilation and delirium were associated with impaired recovery, while ECMO and the presence of family were associated with recovery from PICS. In critically ill COVID-19 patients, delirium management and family interventions may play an important role in promoting recovery from PICS. Trial registration number: UMIN000041276, August 01, 2020.

Background: Bleeding complications during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V‐V ECMO) can be critical. However, there is limited information on the associated risk factors. This study investigated the risk factors for bleeding complications during V‐V ECMO as a bridge to recovery.Methods: This single‐center retrospective study enrolled 59 patients (bleeding and non‐bleeding groups) who received V‐V ECMO from 2012 to 2020, to evaluate whether peak activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) value, lowest platelet count, and mobilization to sitting on the edge of the bed during V‐V ECMO were risk factors for bleeding complications, defined according to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines. Age, sex, body mass index, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and ECMO duration before bleeding complications were covariates in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: Thirty‐one (53%) participants experienced 36 bleeding complications; the ECMO cannulation site, gastrointestinal tract, and nasopharyngeal region were the most common bleeding sites. The use of transfusion products and length of ECMO and intensive care unit stay were significantly and medical costs were non‐significantly increased in the bleeding group. Peak APTT (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.05, p < 0.01) was significantly associated whereas the lowest platelet count (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82–1.13, p = 0.66) was unassociated with bleeding complications during ECMO. Achieving mobilization (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02–1.17, p = 0.07) decreased the trend of risk for bleeding complications.Conclusions: Peak APTT might be an independent modifiable factor for bleeding complications during V‐V ECMO. The protective effect of mobilization during V‐V ECMO requires further investigation.

Background: Previous studies examining sex differences in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have indicated that women have favorable outcomes; however, detailed evidence remains lacking. We aimed to investigate sex differences in the backgrounds and outcomes of patients undergoing ECPR for OHCA. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the registry from the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective multicenter study conducted in Japan from 2013 to 2018. Adult patients without external causes who underwent ECPR for OHCA were included. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Status 1 or 2) at hospital discharge. We used multilevel logistic regression to evaluate the association of sex differences, adjusting for center-level (hospital) and individual-level variables (patient background, cardiac arrest situation, and in-hospital intervention factors). For sensitivity analyses, we performed three models of multilevel logistic regression when selecting confounders. Results: Among the 1819 patients, 1523 (83.7%) were men, and 296 (16.3%) were women. The median age (61.0 vs. 58.0 years), presence of a witness (78.8% vs. 79.2%), and occurrence of bystander CPR (57.5% vs. 61.6%) were similar between groups. Women were more likely to present with an initial non-shockable rhythm (31.7% vs. 49.7%), as well as a non-shockable rhythm at hospital arrival (52.1% vs. 61.5%) and at ECMO initiation (48.1% vs. 57.1%). The proportion of favorable neurological outcomes was 12.3% in males and 15.9% in females (p = 0.10). Multilevel logistic regression analysis showed that the female sex was significantly associated with a favorable neurologic outcome at discharge (adjusted odds ratio: 1.60 [95% confidence interval: 1.05–2.43]; p = 0.03). This advantage in women was consistently observed in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: The female sex is significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge in patients who received ECPR for OHCA.

Selecting the appropriate candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging. Previously, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines suggested the example of inclusion criteria. However, it is unclear whether patients who meet the inclusion criteria of the ELSO guidelines have more favorable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the outcomes and select inclusion criteria of the ELSO guidelines. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective study conducted between 2019 and 2021. Adult patients with OHCA treated with ECPR were included. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2) at 30 days. An ELSO criteria score was assigned based on four criteria: (i) age < 70 years; (ii) witness; (iii) bystander CPR; and (iv) low-flow time (< 60 min). Subgroup analysis based on initial cardiac rhythm was performed. Among 9,909 patients, 227 with OHCA were included. The proportion of favorable neurological outcomes according to the number of ELSO criteria met were: 0.0% (0/3), 0 points; 0.0% (0/23), 1 point; 3.0% (2/67), 2 points; 7.3% (6/82), 3 points; and 16.3% (7/43), 4 points. A similar tendency was observed in patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, no such relationship was observed in those with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Patients who adhered more closely to specific inclusion criteria of the ELSO guidelines demonstrated a tendency towards a higher rate of favorable neurological outcomes. However, the relationship was heterogeneous according to initial rhythm.

Background: Selecting appropriate patients for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in cases of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest remains challenging, particularly for those with initial nonshockable rhythms. Our aim is to develop a prediction score to identify suitable ECPR candidates in patients with initial nonshockable rhythm. Methods: The data were sourced from the SAVE‐J II (Study of Advanced Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation With Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan II) study, a retrospective multicenter observational study in Japan. Included were adult patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest who underwent ECPR with initial pulseless electrical activity or asystole. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We developed a prediction score, employing logistic regression analysis and internally validating it with 1000 bootstrap samples. The performance of the score in predicting a favorable neurological outcome at discharge was also evaluated. Results: Among 648 eligible patients, 86 (13.3%) survived to hospital discharge. The median age was 60.5 years, 75.9% (492) were male, and 74.4% (482) had pulseless electrical activity as the initial rhythm. Three clinical predictors for the START‐ECPR Score (Signs of Life, Transient ROSC, Not Asystole Rhythm to ECPR Score) were identified: shockable rhythm or pulseless electrical activity at hospital arrival, transient return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, and signs of life at hospital arrival. Survival rates were 4.4% (7/159) for a score of 0, 10.7% (38/356) for a score of 1, and 30.8% (39/130) for scores of 2 to –3. The bias‐corrected C‐index for the score was 0.696. For predicting favorable neurologic outcomes at discharge, the C‐index was 0.761. Conclusions: We developed a straightforward 3‐factor prediction score for predicting survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic outcomes in patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with initial nonshockable rhythms receiving ECPR.