Background: Human anatomy is a crucial component of medical curricula, requiring innovative methods to enhance students’ learning outcomes. Recently, various technology-based methods have emerged to address the limitations of traditional anatomy teaching methods. Among these, serious games have emerged as a promising tool demonstrating effectiveness in achieving various learning outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of serious games in anatomy education and identify gaps in literature. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed. Of 900 records identified, 24 records were eligible for the full text review. Of these, 14 studies were included eventually for detailed analysis. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: The results showed that the key learning domains assessed were knowledge acquisition, engagement, perception, and skills development. Most studies reported positive outcomes in terms of students’ performance and satisfaction. Despite these findings, variations in study design, sample size, and assessment methods were noted, limiting the generalizability of results. Conclusions: Serious games represent a novel supplement to anatomy education, fostering improved learning outcomes and engagement. However, future work should focus on well-crafted randomized controlled trials to effectively evaluate the impact of using serious games in anatomy teaching with combined qualitative and quantitative evaluation approaches.

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) represents a growing cause of medical emergencies globally. Objective: This study evaluates whether healthcare outcomes for TBI patients differ between daytime and on-call (after-hours) admissions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from a hospital database spanning January 2015 to December 2019. Of the 670 cases reviewed, 45 patients over the age of 65 were admitted with head trauma. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Surgical interventions were significantly less frequent during on-call hours. Admission type (elective vs. emergent) showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Postoperative ICU length of stay (LOS) was markedly longer for on-call admissions (p = 0.002). Due to a controlled sample size, p-value interpretations would need some discretion. TBI patients admitted during on-call hours had a 9.9-fold increase in ICU stay, a 2.5-fold increase in total hospital LOS, and a 475% higher complication rate compared to daytime admissions. Complication rates were 20% for daytime admissions versus 92% for on-call admissions. Furthermore, patients treated during on-call hours were 11 times more likely to be discharged in an unconscious state (GCS < 8). Conclusions: TBI outcomes are significantly worse during on-call hours. Enhancing imaging availability and staffing during these periods may help improve patient outcomes.