Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly being performed in younger and lower surgical risk patients. Reintervention for failed transcatheter heart valves will likely increase in the future as younger patients are expected to outlive the initial bioprosthesis. While redo-TAVR has emerged as an attractive and less invasive alternative to surgical explantation (TAVR-explant) to treat transcatheter heart valve failure, it may not be feasible in all patients due to the risk of coronary obstruction and impaired coronary access. Conversely, TAVR-explant can be offered to most patients who are surgical candidates, but the reported outcomes have shown high mortality and morbidity. This review provides the latest evidence, current challenges, and future directions on redo-TAVR and TAVR-explant for transcatheter heart valve failure, to guide aortic valve reintervention and facilitate patients’ lifetime management of aortic stenosis.

Over the last 20 years, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis and has become the standard of care across the entire spectrum of surgical risk. Expansion of TAVR in treating younger, lower-risk patients with longer life expectancies, and treating earlier in the disease process, has seen a continuous evolution in device technology, with several next-generation transcatheter heart valves developed to minimize procedural complications and improve patient outcomes. This review provides an update on the latest advances in transcatheter delivery systems, devices, and leaflet technology.

Background: The clinical significance of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair is not well understood. There is limited evidence regarding the feasibility, durability of repair, and the prognostic value of MAC in this population. We sought to examine the prognostic value of MAC, its severity, and its impact on procedural success and durability of mitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair. Methods and Results: We reviewed the records of 280 patients with moderate–severe or severe mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair with MitraClip from March 2014 to March 2022. The primary end point was cumulative survival at 1 year. Independent factors associated with the primary end point were identified using multivariable Cox regression. Among 280 patients included in the final analysis, 249 had none/mild MAC, and 31 had moderate/severe MAC. Median follow‐up was 23.1 months (interquartile range: 11.1–40.4). Procedural success was comparable in the MAC and non‐MAC groups (92.6% versus 91.4%, P =0.79) with similar rates of residual mitral regurgitation ≤2 at 1 year (86.7% versus 93.2%, P =0.55). Moderate/severe MAC was associated with less improvement in New York Heart Association III/IV at 30 days when compared with none/mild MAC (45.8% versus 14.3%, P =0.001). The moderate/severe MAC group had lower cumulative 1‐year survival (56.8% versus 80.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.98 [95% CI, 1.27–3.10], P =0.002). Moderate/severe MAC and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality for mitral valve repair were independently associated with the primary end point (HR, 2.20 [1.10–4.41], P =0.02; and HR, 1.014 [1.006–1.078], P =0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Mitral TEER is a safe and feasible intervention in selected patients with significant MAC and associated with similar mitral regurgitation reduction at 1 year compared with patients with none/mild MAC. Patients with moderate/severe MAC had a high 1‐year mortality and less improvement in their symptoms after TEER.

Background: Mitral annular dilation has been shown to challenge successful edge-to-edge therapy with earlier MitraClip generations. Recently, third-generation MitraClip-XTR with extended clip arm length was introduced. We assessed the impact of annular dilation on residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip-XTR repair and sought to identify cutoffs associated with suboptimal MR reduction. Methods: We included 107 patients (78.9±6.7 years; 40.2% female) with symptomatic severe MR (46.7% primary MR; 53.3% secondary MR) undergoing MitraClip-XTR repair. Annular dimensions were retrospectively assessed by 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional-transesophageal echocardiography including a semiautomated analysis. Impact of annular diameters and area on suboptimal reduction defined as ≥2+MR on transthoracic echocardiography at discharge was assessed and predictive cutoff values identified. Previously identified predictors of suboptimal outcome after MitraClip therapy were included in multivariable analysis. Results: Technical success was achieved in 93%, 1-year mortality was 23%. Suboptimal MR reduction was observed in 26% and associated with higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio, 4.5 [1.5–14.1]). End-systolic anteroposterior and intercommissural annular diameters, annular area and further vena-contracta width, effective regurgitant orifice area and left atrial volume were associated with suboptimal outcomes. Independent predictors of suboptimal reduction were end-systolic annular area (odds ratio, 1.36 [1.08–1.71] per cm ² ) and vena-contracta width (odds ratio, 1.47 [1.04–2.09] per mm). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, 3-dimensional-transesophageal echocardiography end-systolic anteroposterior diameter >40.5 mm, intercommisural diameter >40.5 mm, and annular-area >12.50 cm ² were the most predictive thresholds for suboptimal reduction. If all 3 annular measurements exceeded the determined threshold values, the risk for suboptimal reduction increased by 17-fold. Conclusions: Annular dilation was found to challenge successful edge-to-edge therapy also with extended-reach MitraClip-XTR. Our proposed thresholds for preprocedural annular dimensions may serve as guidance for improved patient selection in edge-to-edge repair.