Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics, and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates and consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and industry (E_FF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (E_LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover change data, fire activity associated with deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (G_ATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO₂ sink (S_OCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in S_OCEAN is evaluated with data products based on surveys of ocean CO₂ measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO₂ sink (S_LAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of independent dynamic global vegetation models. We compare the mean land and ocean fluxes and their variability to estimates from three atmospheric inverse methods for three broad latitude bands. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2006–2015), E_FF was 9.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, E_LUC 1.0 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM 4.5 ± 0.1 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND 3.1 ± 0.9 GtC yr⁻¹. For year 2015 alone, the growth in E_FF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, showing a slowdown in growth of these emissions compared to the average growth of 1.8 % yr⁻¹ that took place during 2006–2015. Also, for 2015, E_LUC was 1.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM was 6.3 ± 0.2 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN was 3.0 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND was 1.9 ± 0.9 GtC yr⁻¹. G_ATM was higher in 2015 compared to the past decade (2006–2015), reflecting a smaller S_LAND for that year. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration reached 399.4 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2015. For 2016, preliminary data indicate the continuation of low growth in E_FF with +0.2 % (range of −1.0 to +1.8 %) based on national emissions projections for China and USA, and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. In spite of the low growth of E_FF in 2016, the growth rate in atmospheric CO₂ concentration is expected to be relatively high because of the persistence of the smaller residual terrestrial sink (S_LAND) in response to El Niño conditions of 2015–2016. From this projection of E_FF and assumed constant E_LUC for 2016, cumulative emissions of CO₂ will reach 565 ± 55 GtC (2075 ± 205 GtCO₂) for 1870–2016, about 75 % from E_FF and 25 % from E_LUC. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All observations presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (doi:10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2016).

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the global carbon budget – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and industry (E_FF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (E_LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (G_ATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO₂ sink (S_OCEAN) and terrestrial CO₂ sink (S_LAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (B_IM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2007–2016), E_FF was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, E_LUC 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr⁻¹, with a budget imbalance B_IM of 0.6 GtC yr⁻¹ indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in E_FF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹. Also for 2016, E_LUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr⁻¹, with a small B_IM of −0.3 GtC. G_ATM continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the high fossil emissions and the small S_LAND consistent with El Niño conditions. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in E_FF of +2.0 % (range of 0.8 to 3.0 %) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of gross domestic product (GDP) corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017 (GCP, 2017).

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and a methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics, and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates as well as consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and industry (E_FF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change (E_LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover-change data, fire activity associated with deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (G_ATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO₂ sink (S_OCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in S_OCEAN is evaluated with data products based on surveys of ocean CO₂ measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO₂ sink (S_LAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of independent dynamic global vegetation models forced by observed climate, CO₂, and land-cover change (some including nitrogen–carbon interactions). We compare the mean land and ocean fluxes and their variability to estimates from three atmospheric inverse methods for three broad latitude bands. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2005–2014), E_FF was 9.0 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, E_LUC was 0.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM was 4.4 ± 0.1 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND was 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr⁻¹. For the year 2014 alone, E_FF grew to 9.8 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, 0.6 % above 2013, continuing the growth trend in these emissions, albeit at a slower rate compared to the average growth of 2.2 % yr⁻¹ that took place during 2005–2014. Also, for 2014, E_LUC was 1.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM was 3.9 ± 0.2 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND was 4.1 ± 0.9 GtC yr⁻¹. G_ATM was lower in 2014 compared to the past decade (2005–2014), reflecting a larger S_LAND for that year. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration reached 397.15 ± 0.10 ppm averaged over 2014. For 2015, preliminary data indicate that the growth in E_FF will be near or slightly below zero, with a projection of −0.6 [range of −1.6 to +0.5] %, based on national emissions projections for China and the USA, and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the global economy for the rest of the world. From this projection of E_FF and assumed constant E_LUC for 2015, cumulative emissions of CO₂ will reach about 555 ± 55 GtC (2035 ± 205 GtCO₂) for 1870–2015, about 75 % from E_FF and 25 % from E_LUC. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2015, 2014, 2013). All observations presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (doi:10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2015).

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and a methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainties, based on the combination of a range of data, algorithms, statistics, and model estimates and their interpretation by a broad scientific community. We discuss changes compared to previous estimates, consistency within and among components, alongside methodology and data limitations. CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production (E_FF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (E_LUC), mainly deforestation, are based on combined evidence from land-cover-change data, fire activity associated with deforestation, and models. The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (G_ATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The mean ocean CO₂ sink (S_OCEAN) is based on observations from the 1990s, while the annual anomalies and trends are estimated with ocean models. The variability in S_OCEAN is evaluated with data products based on surveys of ocean CO₂ measurements. The global residual terrestrial CO₂ sink (S_LAND) is estimated by the difference of the other terms of the global carbon budget and compared to results of independent dynamic global vegetation models forced by observed climate, CO₂, and land-cover-change (some including nitrogen–carbon interactions). We compare the mean land and ocean fluxes and their variability to estimates from three atmospheric inverse methods for three broad latitude bands. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ, reflecting the current capacity to characterise the annual estimates of each component of the global carbon budget. For the last decade available (2004–2013), E_FF was 8.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr⁻¹, E_LUC 0.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM 4.3 ± 0.1 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND 2.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr⁻¹. For year 2013 alone, E_FF grew to 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, 2.3% above 2012, continuing the growth trend in these emissions, E_LUC was 0.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, G_ATM was 5.4 ± 0.2 GtC yr⁻¹, S_OCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, and S_LAND was 2.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr⁻¹. G_ATM was high in 2013, reflecting a steady increase in E_FF and smaller and opposite changes between S_OCEAN and S_LAND compared to the past decade (2004–2013). The global atmospheric CO₂ concentration reached 395.31 ± 0.10 ppm averaged over 2013. We estimate that E_FF will increase by 2.5% (1.3–3.5%) to 10.1 ± 0.6 GtC in 2014 (37.0 ± 2.2 GtCO₂ yr⁻¹), 65% above emissions in 1990, based on projections of world gross domestic product and recent changes in the carbon intensity of the global economy. From this projection of E_FF and assumed constant E_LUC for 2014, cumulative emissions of CO₂ will reach about 545 ± 55 GtC (2000 ± 200 GtCO₂) for 1870–2014, about 75% from E_FF and 25% from E_LUC. This paper documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new carbon budget compared with previous publications of this living data set (Le Quéré et al., 2013, 2014). All observations presented here can be downloaded from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (doi:10.3334/CDIAC/GCP_2014).

The globally integrated sea–air anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) flux from 1990 to 2009 is determined from models and data-based approaches as part of the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP) project. Numerical methods include ocean inverse models, atmospheric inverse models, and ocean general circulation models with parameterized biogeochemistry (OBGCMs). The median value of different approaches shows good agreement in average uptake. The best estimate of anthropogenic CO₂ uptake for the time period based on a compilation of approaches is −2.0 Pg C yr⁻¹. The interannual variability in the sea–air flux is largely driven by large-scale climate re-organizations and is estimated at 0.2 Pg C yr⁻¹ for the two decades with some systematic differences between approaches. The largest differences between approaches are seen in the decadal trends. The trends range from −0.13 (Pg C yr⁻¹) decade⁻¹ to −0.50 (Pg C yr⁻¹) decade⁻¹ for the two decades under investigation. The OBGCMs and the data-based sea–air CO₂ flux estimates show appreciably smaller decadal trends than estimates based on changes in carbon inventory suggesting that methods capable of resolving shorter timescales are showing a slowing of the rate of ocean CO₂ uptake. RECCAP model outputs for five decades show similar differences in trends between approaches.

The recent IPCC reports state that continued anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are changing the climate, threatening severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts. Slow progress in emissions reduction to mitigate climate change is resulting in increased attention to what is called geoengineering, climate engineering, or climate intervention – deliberate interventions to counter climate change that seek to either modify the Earth's radiation budget or remove greenhouse gases such as CO₂ from the atmosphere. When focused on CO₂, the latter of these categories is called carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Future emission scenarios that stay well below 2 °C, and all emission scenarios that do not exceed 1.5 °C warming by the year 2100, require some form of CDR. At present, there is little consensus on the climate impacts and atmospheric CO₂ reduction efficacy of the different types of proposed CDR. To address this need, the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (or CDRMIP) was initiated. This project brings together models of the Earth system in a common framework to explore the potential, impacts, and challenges of CDR. Here, we describe the first set of CDRMIP experiments, which are formally part of the 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). These experiments are designed to address questions concerning CDR-induced climate reversibility, the response of the Earth system to direct atmospheric CO₂ removal (direct air capture and storage), and the CDR potential and impacts of afforestation and reforestation, as well as ocean alkalinization.>