Hypoglycemia represents one of the most frequent metabolic disturbances of the neonate, associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially if left untreated or diagnosed after the establishment of brain damage. The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from the most recently published influential guidelines on the diagnosis, screening, prevention and management of this common neonatal complication. Therefore, a descriptive review of the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM), the European Foundation for the Care of the Newborn Infants (EFCNI), the Queensland Clinical Guidelines-Australia (AUS), the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) and the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) on neonatal hypoglycemia was carried out. There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines on the risk factors, the clinical signs and symptoms of NH, and the main preventive strategies. Additionally, the importance of early recognition of at-risk infants, timely identification of NH and prompt initiation of treatment in optimizing the outcomes of hypoglycemic neonates are universally highlighted. All medical societies, except PES, recommend screening for NH in asymptomatic high-risk and symptomatic newborn infants, but they do not provide consistent screening approaches. Moreover, the reviewed guidelines point out that the diagnosis of NH should be confirmed by laboratory methods of BGL measurement, although treatment should not be delayed until the results become available. The definition of NH lacks uniformity and it is generally agreed that a single BG value cannot accurately define this clinical entity. Therefore, all medical societies support the use of operational thresholds for the management of NH, although discrepancies exist regarding the recommended cut-off values, the optimal treatment and surveillance strategies of both symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemic neonates as well as the treatment targets. Over the past several decades, ΝH has remained an issue of keen debate as it is a preventable cause of brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment; however, there is no clear definition or consistent treatment policies. Thus, the establishment of specific diagnostic criteria and uniform protocols for the management of this common biochemical disorder is of paramount importance as it will hopefully allow for the early identification of infants at risk, the establishment of efficient preventive measures, the optimal treatment in the first hours of a neonate’s life and, subsequently, the improvement of neonatal outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the incidence of prenatally diagnosed isolated single umbilical artery (iSUA) and its impact on major pregnancy outcomes, as well as to investigate potential risk factors. Materials and methods: A prospective study of singleton pregnancies, undergoing routine anomaly scans at 20⁺⁰–24⁺⁰ weeks of gestation, was carried out from 2018 to 2022. The effect of sonographically detected iSUA on small-for-gestational-age neonates (SGA) and preterm delivery (PTD) was evaluated using parameterized Student’s t-test, nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test and the chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models were implemented to assess the independent association between iSUA and the main outcomes, as well as with potential risk factors, while adjusting for specific confounders. Results: The study population included 6528 singleton pregnancies and the incidence of prenatally diagnosed iSUA was 1.3%. Prenatally diagnosed iSUA had a statistically significant association with both SGA neonates (aOR: 1.909; 95% CI: 1.152–3.163) and PTD (aOR: 1.903; 95% CI: 1.035–3.498), while no association was identified between this sonographic finding and preeclampsia. With regard to risk factors, conception via assisted reproductive technology (ART) was associated with increased risk of iSUA (aOR: 2.234; 95% CI: 1.104–4.523), while no other independent predictor for the development of this anatomical variation was identified. Conclusions: Prenatally diagnosed iSUA seems to be associated with a higher incidence of SGA and PTD and is more common in pregnancies following ART, which constitutes a novel finding.

Background: Distal humerus physeal separation (DHPS) presents a rare injury type in young children often associated with misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. The aim of this study was to summarize all the available current evidence regarding the management and outcome of DHPS and determine the incidence of complications and particularly the cubitus varus deformity and avascular necrosis of the trochlea. Methods: A systematic review was conducted under the PRISMA guidelines. Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for studies dealing with children suffering from traumatic DHPS. Results: Twelve studies with a total of 257 children with DHPS were included for analysis. The mean age was 16.8 months (range: 0.1–46 months) with a mean follow-up of 37 months (range: 0.5–516 months). Non-accidental trauma was reported in 17.2% and misdiagnosis at initial assessment in 7.8%. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) was the treatment of choice in 54.4%, open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP) in 26.5%, closed reduction and cast immobilization (CR+cast) in 10.9%, and cast immobilization without reduction in 8.2%. The average range of extension–flexion arc was 2.1° to 127.8° (range: −10–140°). The mean Bauman’s angle was 72.4° (range: 66–79°), the mean shaft–condylar angle was 43.8° (range: 25–59°), the mean humeral length was 21.9 cm (range: 15.5–25.8 cm), and the mean carrying angle was 5.1° (range: 16° varus–19° valgus). According to Flynn’s criteria, 85.2% of cases were classified as excellent or good. The ORPP technique was associated with excellent results, while the CR+cast treatment combination was correlated with the poorest outcome (p = 0.001). Cubitus varus occurred in 18.9% (34 cases) and was highly correlated with CR+cast or cast immobilization alone without fracture reduction (p = 0.014). Avascular necrosis of the trochlea was found in 3.9% (7 cases) and was mainly apparent after cast immobilization without reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Post-traumatic cubitus varus deformity may be encountered in approximately one-fifth of young children with DHPS. Surgical intervention with either CRPP or ORPP is the most effective treatment approach, leading to superior functional outcome and a lower complication rate.

First-trimester sonographic examination remains a fundamental part of antenatal care, providing crucial information for the well-being of both the mother and fetus and leading to the best possible perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to review and compare the most recently published guidelines on first-trimester ultrasound. Therefore, a descriptive review of guidelines from the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), the Australasian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM), the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the Society of Obstetrician and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) regarding first-trimester scans was conducted. There is a consensus regarding the main parameters that should be evaluated, the qualifications of the examiner and specifications of the ultrasound machine, as well as the importance of informed consent. Additionally, the importance of careful visualization of fetal anatomy is discussed, with minor discrepancies regarding the appropriate protocol used. The use of combined first-trimester examination is encouraged by all the reviewed medical societies, although cell-free DNA testing is addressed only by a few, with similar indications. Controversy exists regarding the indications and appropriate gestational age at which the first-trimester scan should be performed, as well as the proper establishment of pregnancy dating. Notably, recommendations regarding fetal growth restriction (FGR) and diagnostic invasive procedures are made only by few medical societies, with the AWMF and SOGC addressing screening for FGR. Furthermore, invasive diagnostic testing is discussed by the AIUM, AWMF and SOGC, with differentiations among them regarding the indications for pursuing such procedures. First-trimester sonographic examination is essential for assessing fetal viability, establishing accurate pregnancy dating, evaluating fetal and maternal anatomy and calculating the risk of various fetal and maternal conditions. The implementation of evidence-based, unified protocols would advance both maternal and fetal outcomes.

Importance: Monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies are at risk of unique fetal and obstetric complications, which require increased surveillance and specific interventions to minimize the associated neonatal morbidity and mortality. Objective: This review aimed to evaluate and compare the most recently published influential guidelines on the management of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Evidence Acquisition: A comparative review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), and the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ISUOG) was carried out. Results: All the reviewed guidelines recommend the determination of chorionicity and amnionicity in the first trimester, along with the precise labeling of the twins and confirmation of the gestational age based on the crown-rump length of the larger twin or the dates of assisted reproductive techniques. They also encourage the performance of aneuploidy screening during the first trimester, using either a combined nuchal translucency and biochemical markers test or cfDNA. A detailed anatomy scan is recommended, with emphasis on the fetal cardiac assessment. There is agreement on the recommended ultrasonographic surveillance protocol, the diagnostic criteria of TTTS, TAPS, and TRAP, the optimal timing of delivery in case of uncomplicated MC twins, and the need for earlier delivery in case of complications or MCMA twins. All the reviewed medical societies provide similar recommendations regarding the management of pregnancies complicated by TTTS, TAPS, discordant fetal anomaly, and demise of one co-twin. Minor discrepancies were identified regarding the diagnosis and management of sFGR, the routine assessment of cervical length, as well as the first-line aneuploidy screening method. Conclusions: Multiple pregnancies pose significant maternal, fetal, and obstetric risks compared with singleton pregnancies, with MC twins being at the highest risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly in the absence of increased surveillance or therapeutic interventions. The development and implementation of consistent international evidence-based practice guidelines for the prompt diagnosis and management of MC twin pregnancies and their associated complications may contribute to more favorable outcomes.