Yen Tai

Dr. Yen Tai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2024 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAna Westenberger
Ana Westenberger
VSVolha Skrahina
Volha Skrahina
TUTatiana Usnich
Tatiana Usnich
CBChristian Beetz
Christian Beetz
EVEva-Juliane Vollstedt
Eva-Juliane Vollstedt
PBPeter Bauer
Peter Bauer
Estimates of the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic variants in Parkinson’s disease (PD) in different populations are currently limited and biased. Furthermore, although therapeutic modification of several genetic targets has reached the clinical trial stage, a major obstacle in conducting these trials is that PD patients are largely unaware of their genetic status and, therefore, cannot be recruited. Expanding the number of investigated PD-related genes and including genes related to disorders with overlapping clinical features in large, well-phenotyped PD patient groups is a prerequisite for capturing the full variant spectrum underlying PD and for stratifying and prioritizing patients for gene-targeted clinical trials. The Rostock Parkinson’s disease (ROPAD) study is an observational clinical study aiming to determine the frequency and spectrum of genetic variants contributing to PD in a large international cohort. We investigated variants in 50 genes with either an established relevance for PD or possible phenotypic overlap in a group of 12 580 PD patients from 16 countries [62.3% male; 92.0% White; 27.0% positive family history (FH+), median age at onset (AAO) 59 years] using a next-generation sequencing panel. Altogether, in 1864 (14.8%) ROPAD participants (58.1% male; 91.0% White, 35.5% FH+, median AAO 55 years), a PD-relevant genetic test (PDGT) was positive based on GBA1 risk variants (10.4%) or pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in LRRK2 (2.9%), PRKN (0.9%), SNCA (0.2%) or PINK1 (0.1%) or a combination of two genetic findings in two genes (∼0.2%). Of note, the adjusted positive PDGT fraction, i.e. the fraction of positive PDGTs per country weighted by the fraction of the population of the world that they represent, was 14.5%. Positive PDGTs were identified in 19.9% of patients with an AAO ≤ 50 years, in 19.5% of patients with FH+ and in 26.9% with an AAO ≤ 50 years and FH+. In comparison to the idiopathic PD group (6846 patients with benign variants), the positive PDGT group had a significantly lower AAO (4 years, P = 9 × 10−34). The probability of a positive PDGT decreased by 3% with every additional AAO year (P = 1 × 10−35). Female patients were 22% more likely to have a positive PDGT (P = 3 × 10−4), and for individuals with FH+ this likelihood was 55% higher (P = 1 × 10−14). About 0.8% of the ROPAD participants had positive genetic testing findings in parkinsonism-, dystonia/dyskinesia- or dementia-related genes. In the emerging era of gene-targeted PD clinical trials, our finding that ∼15% of patients harbour potentially actionable genetic variants offers an important prospect to affected individuals and their families and underlines the need for genetic testing in PD patients. Thus, the insights from the ROPAD study allow for data-driven, differential genetic counselling across the spectrum of different AAOs and family histories and promote a possible policy change in the application of genetic testing as a routine part of patient evaluation and care in PD.

28 April 2014 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLeonora Wilkinson
Leonora Wilkinson
YTYen Tai
Yen Tai
CLChia Shu Lin
Chia Shu Lin
DLDavid A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado
DBDavid Brooks
David Brooks
MJMarjan Jahanshahi
Marjan Jahanshahi
The basal ganglia (BG) mediate certain types of procedural learning, such as probabilistic classification learning on the ‘weather prediction task’ (WPT). Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), who have BG dysfunction, are impaired at WPT‐learning, but it remains unclear what component of the WPT is important for learning to occur. We tested the hypothesis that learning through processing of corrective feedback is the essential component and is associated with release of striatal dopamine. We employed two WPT paradigms, either involving learning via processing of corrective feedback (FB) or in a paired associate manner (PA). To test the prediction that learning on the FB but not PA paradigm would be associated with dopamine release in the striatum, we used serial 11C‐raclopride (RAC) positron emission tomography (PET), to investigate striatal dopamine release during FB and PA WPT‐learning in healthy individuals. Two groups, FB, (n = 7) and PA (n = 8), underwent RAC PET twice, once while performing the WPT and once during a control task. Based on a region‐of‐interest approach, striatal RAC‐binding potentials reduced by 13–17% in the right ventral striatum when performing the FB compared to control task, indicating release of synaptic dopamine. In contrast, right ventral striatal RAC binding non‐significantly increased by 9% during the PA task. While differences between the FB and PA versions of the WPT in effort and decision‐making is also relevant, we conclude striatal dopamine is released during FB‐based WPT‐learning, implicating the striatum and its dopamine connections in mediating learning with FB. Hum Brain Mapp 35:5106–5115, 2014. © 2014 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

15 December 2010 in Neuropsychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YTYen Tai
Yen Tai
RHRosa Hoshi
Rosa Hoshi
CBCatherine M Brignell
Catherine M Brignell
LCLisa Cohen
Lisa Cohen
DBDavid Brooks
David Brooks
PPPaola Piccini
Paola Piccini

13 July 2023 in Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCMatteo Ciocca
Matteo Ciocca
BSBarry M. Seemungal
Barry M. Seemungal
YTYen Tai
Yen Tai
Falls in extrapyramidal disorders, particularly Parkinson's disease (PD), multisystem atrophy (MSA), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), are key milestones affecting patients' quality of life, incurring increased morbidity/mortality and high healthcare costs. Unfortunately, gait and balance in parkinsonisms respond poorly to currently available treatments. A serendipitous observation of improved gait and balance in patients with PD receiving spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for back pain kindled an interest in using SCS to treat gait disorders in parkinsonisms. We reviewed preclinical and clinical studies of SCS to treat gait dysfunction in parkinsonisms, covering its putative mechanisms and efficacies. Preclinical studies in animal models of PD and clinical studies in patients with PD, PSP, and MSA who received SCS for gait disorders were included. The main outcome assessed was clinical improvement in gait, together with outcome measures used and possible mechanism of actions. We identified 500 references, and 45 met the selection criteria and have been included in this study for analysis. Despite positive results in animal models, the outcomes in human studies are inconsistent. The lack of blind and statistically powered studies, the heterogeneity in patient selection and study outcomes, and the poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action of SCS are some of the limiting factors in the field. Addressing these limitations will allow us to draw more reliable conclusions on the effects of SCS on gait and balance in extrapyramidal disorders.

22 June 2010 in Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YTYen Tai
Yen Tai
DKDimitri Michael Kullmann
Dimitri Michael Kullmann
RHRobin S. Howard
Robin S. Howard
GSGeoffrey M. Scott
Geoffrey M. Scott
NHNicholas P. Hirsch
Nicholas P. Hirsch
SLSiobhan M. Leary
Siobhan M. Leary

21 May 2025 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBradley Lonergan
Bradley Lonergan
BSBarry M. Seemungal
Barry M. Seemungal
MCMatteo Ciocca
Matteo Ciocca
YTYen Tai
Yen Tai
Background: Postural imbalance with falls affects 80% of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) at 10 years. Standard PD therapies (e.g., levodopa and/or deep brain stimulation—DBS) are poor at improving postural imbalance. Additionally, the mechanistic complexity of interpreting postural control is a major barrier to improving our understanding of treatment effects. In this paper, we review the effects of DBS on balance as measured using posturography. We also critically appraise the quantitative measures and analyses used in these studies. Methods: A literature search was performed independently by 2 researchers using the PUBMED database. Thirty-eight studies are included in this review, with DBS at the subthalamic nucleus (STN-) (n = 25), globus pallidus internus (GPi-) (n = 6), ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM)/thalamus (n = 2), and pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) (n = 5). Results: STN- and GPi-DBS reduce static sway in PD and mitigate the increased sway from levodopa. STN-DBS impairs automatic responses to perturbations, whilst GPi-DBS has a more neutral effect. STN-DBS may promote protective strategies following external perturbations but does not improve adaptation. The evidence regarding the effects on gait initiation is less clear. Insufficient evidence exists to make conclusions regarding VIM- and PPN-DBS. Conclusions: STN- and GPi-DBS have differing effects on posturography, which suggests site-specific and possibly non-dopaminergic mechanisms. Posturography tests should be utilised to answer specific questions regarding the mechanisms of and effects on postural control following DBS. We recommend standardising posturography measures and test conditions by expert consensus and greater long-term data collection, utilising ongoing DBS registries.