The Spanish Acquired Hemophilia A (AHA) Registry is intended to update the status of AHA in Spain. One hundred and fifty-four patients were included and retrospectively followed for a median of 12 months. Patients were predominantly male (56.3%), with median age at diagnosis of 74 years. AHA was more frequently idiopathic (44.1%) and autoimmune disorder-associated (31.7%). Thirty-four percent of patients were on antithrombotic therapy at diagnosis. Hemostatic treatment was used in 70% of patients. Recombinant activated factor VII was more frequently infused (60.3% vs 20.6% activated prothrombin complex concentrate). Only 1 patient did not achieve control of hemorrhage. Complete remission (CR) was achieved by 84.2% of cases after immunosuppressive therapy. Steroids alone were less efficient than the other strategies (68.2% vs 87.2%, P = .049), whereas no differences existed among these (steroids/cyclophosphamide, 88.5%, vs steroids/calcineurin inhibitors, 81.2%, vs rituximab-based regimens, 87.5%). Female sex and high inhibitor levels influenced CR negatively. Thirty-six deaths (23.8%) were reported. Main causes of death were infection (15 patients, 9.9%) and hemorrhage (5 patients, 3.3%). All hemorrhage-related and half the infection-related deaths occurred within 2 months of diagnosis. Prior antithrombotic therapy was inversely associated with survival, irrespective of age. Median age of nonsurvivors was significantly higher (79 vs 73 years in survivors). Patients dying of infection were older than the other nonsurvivors (85 vs 78 years). In summary, fatal infection in the first months is common in our series. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with mortality. Particular care should be taken to avoid misdiagnosis.

The development of inhibitors continues to be the most important complication in severe hemophilia A. The management of inhibitor patients revolves around two basic principles: eradication of the inhibitor and management and prevention of bleeding. In this paper, we review the prophylactic treatments carried out in the last two decades with the two available bypassing agents and the results of the clinical trials carried out with the new molecules under investigation or already licensed for the prevention of hemorrhagic episodes in hemophilia, like emicizumab.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze pharmacokinetic and clinical parameters (bleeding rates and joint health) before and after switching from standard half-life (SHL) factor VIII (FVIII) to extended half-life (EHL) PEGylated turoctocog alfa pegol in patients with severe/moderate hemophilia A (HA) on prophylaxis, one year prior to and following the switch in a real-world setting. Methods: A single-center, comparative, observational, sequential, retrospective, multidisciplinary study was designed. The population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WAPPS-Hemo^® platform. The annualized bleeding rate (including total and joint bleeds), joint health (Hemophilia Joint Health Score), FVIII consumption, administration frequency, and treatment costs were analyzed. Results: Eight patients with severe (n = 7) or moderate (n = 1) HA on prophylaxis were included after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol. With this regimen, the median FVIII half-life was 16.8 (15.2–19.1) hours, the area under the curve (AUC) was 18,182 (12,879–21,214) IU·h/dL, and the incremental recovery was 2.2 IU/dL per (1.6–2.4) IU/kg. The patients required a median of 2.0 infusions per week (2.0–2.0), corresponding to a weekly consumption of 57.8 (54.2–61.1) IU/kg. Clinically, the prophylactic regimen was associated with fewer infusions per week, stable joint health, and a reduction in overall treatment costs. Conclusions: Prophylaxis with turoctocog alfa pegol provided the expected pharmacokinetic profile of an EHL-FVIII concentrate, enabled a lower infusion frequency, and was linked to a decreased treatment burden and cost while maintaining joint health.