A common strategy to reduce predator attack on livestock is the deployment of guardian alpacas. However, little research has been conducted on the behaviour of this species while housed with other livestock. This study monitored two male alpacas cohabitating with 180 lambing ewes in order to quantify field behaviour in two phases. Phase one assessed diurnal patterns of alpacas and lambing ewes using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) collars recording data over 41 days, in combination with observational recordings. Phase two developed an alpaca behavioural ethogram through continuous observations from 05:30 to 19:30 h over a 3-day period. The two alpacas shared similar behaviours with commonality of distance travelled, and both species exhibited an increase in activity level based on speed between the times of 05:00 and 17:00 h. The GNSS data indicated that the alpacas flocked with the ewes at night sharing the same resting location, however, would spend time during the day on the outskirts of the paddock. Alpacas were observed to spend the majority of the observation period in two behavioural states: grazing (57%) and resting (27%). As a result of this study we were able to catalogue a range and frequency of field behaviours which alpacas exhibit while cohabitating with lambing ewes. However, further research is needed to determine in more detail how these behaviours correspond with the effectiveness of this species as a livestock guardian.

Liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) is a parasite of herbivores including wildlife. Macropods, such as Eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) and Common wallaroo (Osphranter robustus), are frequently observed sharing grazing sites with domestic livestock. The impact of Macropods, as reservoirs of infection, on livestock production and risks to cross-species transmission are largely unknown. In Phase 1 of this study, liver and faecal samples were collected from 245 Macropods (181 Eastern grey kangaroos, 64 Common wallaroos) cohabiting livestock farms (n = 7) in the Northern Tablelands regions of New South Wales. Total fluke (TFC) and fluke eggs (FEC) were counted in the liver and faeces, respectively, to assess prevalence. Faecal antigens were also measured using the commercial Bio-X Diagnostic Monoscreen AgELISA Fasciola hepatica kit (cELISA) to assess suitability as a diagnostic tool. In Phase 2, Macropod faecal samples were collected from 60 livestock farms to conduct FEC and assess prevalence by region. Liver fluke was prevalent in 22% of Eastern grey kangaroo and 20% of Common wallaroos with prevalence as high as 45% in the Eastern grey kangaroo. Fluke burdens ranged from 1 to 122 flukes (mean = 9 flukes) with a FEC range of 0–195 eggs per gram (epg) of faeces (mean = 18 epg). Evidence of dead and live flukes trapped within fibrotic capsules confirms the ability of Macropods to resolve infections. cELISA proved highly specific (100%) and sensitive (98%) in liver fluke detection however fibrotic capsules observed in the liver may reduce the correlation of coproantigens with fluke burden. Phase 2 revealed that 27% of livestock farms had Macropods infected with liver fluke. Overall, this study confirmed Eastern grey kangaroo and Common wallaroo are susceptible hosts and potential reservoirs for liver fluke and, monitoring infections in Macropods would assist in livestock disease management.

This paper describes a protocol in which female participants scored a range of sensory attributes and applied a financial value to sleeves made from knitted fabric after undertaking a 30 minute circuit training program in a gym. Each participant wore a test and a control sleeve which they scored a line scale for breathability (anchored by the words ‘doesn’t breathe well’/‘breathes well’), skin feel (anchored by the words ‘prickly itchy’/‘soft smooth’), feel after exercise (anchored by the words ‘damp sweaty’/‘dry’) and overall comfort (anchored by the words ‘very uncomfortable’/‘very comfortable’). Participants also estimated their willingness to pay (WTP) for two long-sleeved next-to-skin garments made from the test and the control fabrics. All sensory scores and WTP estimates were positively correlated. Participant and sleeve fit impacted on sensory scores and WTP estimates. However, the significance of participant and fit effects were reduced if differences between the test and control sleeves were analysed and therefore this difference was a better measure of the fabric attributes than simply meaning the test fabric score. The sleeve protocol provided a relatively inexpensive and simple means to score fabrics on sensory attributes and WTP.