Chronic inflammation is increasingly recognized as a crucial contributor to sarcopenia pathogenesis, but accurate diagnosis remains a challenge. Our study aims to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia and the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), a comprehensive indicator of inflammation. This cross-sectional study enrolled 632 patients. All participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Sarcopenia was assessed through the evaluation of handgrip strength and calf circumference. To determine the SII, we used the formula: Platelet count (109/mm3)×Neutrophil count (109/mm3) / Lymphocyte count (109/mm3). The average age of the participants was 74.8 ± 6.4, and 62.3% (n = 394) were female. Patients were grouped as non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic. The non-sarcopenic group had 536 patients (84.8%), while the sarcopenic group comprised 96 patients (15.2%). Sarcopenic patients showed a higher median SII score than the non-sarcopenic group (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the SII score was significantly and independently associated with sarcopenia even after adjusting for potential confounding factors (β = 1.002, 95% CI = 1.001–1.003, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis identified the optimal cut-off for SII in predicting sarcopenia as > 765. At this threshold, the negative predictive values were determined to be 88.1%, with a specificity of 88%. SII is significantly associated with sarcopenia in a geriatric outpatient population, and a population-specific SII cut-off may serve as a novel, simple, and practical biomarker for diagnosing sarcopenia.

Purpose: Immunization is one of the main components of preventive medicine measures. Influenza, pneumococcal, tetanus, and shingles vaccines are recommended for older adults routinely. This study aimed to show the knowledge and attitudes of the physicians to older adults’ vaccination schemes. Patients and Methods: An electronic self-reported questionnaire was sent to physicians between March and July 2021 in Turkey. Sociodemographic characteristics, professional experience, area of expertise, and practice setting of the participants were recorded. As multiple-choice questions; the routinely recommended vaccines, and vaccines suggested in their daily practice before and after the COVID-19 pandemic were enquired. Results: A total of 435 participants were included in the study. 43.9% of the patients were primary family physicians, and 36.8% were internists. 63.4% of the participants had reported reviewing the National Vaccination Scheme. 94.5% of the medical doctors indicated that they had recommended any vaccination to their patients. 20.9% of the practitioners could select four or five of the routinely recommended vaccines. Reviewing the National Adult Vaccination Scheme and being an internist were positively related to predicting the recommended vaccines. The recommendation rates of influenza and pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) were seen at 88% and 78%, respectively. Except for PCV13, recommendation rates of other routine vaccines were decreased after the pandemic. Conclusion: Awareness of routine vaccination schedules should be improved among health-care professionals, and reminders for immunization should be provided periodically in each health-care setting.