Jani Lamarche

Ms. Jani Lamarche

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

21 August 2023 in Frontiers in Digital Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJani Lamarche
Jani Lamarche
ACAngélica Cusson
Angélica Cusson
RNRinat Nissim
Rinat Nissim
JAJonathan Avery
Jonathan Avery
JWJiahui Wong
Jiahui Wong
SLSophie Lebel
Sophie Lebel
Background: Family caregivers of cancer survivors experience equal or greater levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) than survivors themselves. Some interventions have demonstrated their ability to reduce FCR among cancer survivors and dyads (patient and caregivers). However, to date, no validated intervention exists to focus solely on family caregiver's FCR.Objectives: This study aimed to (1) adapt the evidence-based in-person Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) for family caregivers (referred here in as FC-FORT) and to a virtual delivery format and (2) test its usability when offered virtually.Methods: The adaptation of FC-FORT was overseen by an advisory board and guided by the Information Systems Research Framework. Following this adaptation, female family caregivers and therapists were recruited for the usability study. Participants took part in 7 weekly virtual group therapy sessions, a semi-structured exit interview and completed session feedback questionnaires. Therapists were offered a virtual training and weekly supervision. Fidelity of treatment administration was assessed each session. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Exit interviews were transcribed verbatim using NVivo Transcription and coded using conventional content analysis. Results were presented back to the advisory board to further refine FC-FORT.Results: The advisory board (n = 16) met virtually on 7 occasions to adapt FC-FORT (i.e., patient manuals, virtual format) and discuss recruitment strategies. Minor (e.g., revised text, adapted materials to virtual format) and major adaptations (e.g., added and rearranged sessions) were made to FC-FORT and subsequently approved by the advisory board. Four family caregivers and three therapists took part in the first round of the usability testing. Six family caregivers and the same three therapists took part in the second round. Overall, participants were very satisfied with FC-FORT's usability. Qualitative analysis identified 4 key themes: usability of FC-FORT, satisfaction and engagement with content, group cohesion, and impact of FC-FORT. All participants indicated that they would recommend FC-FORT to others as is.Conclusions: Using a multidisciplinary advisory board, our team successfully adapted FC-FORT and tested its usability using videoconferencing. Results from this study indicate that the efficacy and acceptability of FC-FORT are now ready to be tested in a larger pilot study.

1 April 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJani Lamarche
Jani Lamarche
FAFaye Ajmera
Faye Ajmera
JAJonathan Avery
Jonathan Avery
GSGhizlène Sehabi
Ghizlène Sehabi
Sophie LebelSophie Lebel
Sophie Lebel
RNRinat Nissim
Rinat Nissim
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) affects approximately 50% of family caregivers. While FCR in cancer patients has been well-documented, less is known about the experience of FCR in family caregivers. This study aimed to qualitatively explore the distinct characteristics of FCR in family caregivers. A focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconferencing with family caregivers of cancer survivors (stages I–III, finished treatment, no recurrence). Participants were recruited through Canadian hospitals, community partners, and social media. The focus group and qualitative interviews explored family caregivers’ experiences of FCR, including its content, frequency, impact, and management. A reflexive thematic analysis was used. In total, twenty family caregivers participated. Six participated in the focus group. Sixteen participated in the interviews. Two participated in both. Family caregivers described their experience of FCR as all-consuming, constant, and marked by a sense of helplessness. Qualitative analysis revealed a major theme of relational aspects of FCR in family caregivers, with the following four inter-related themes: patient-centric hypervigilance, self-silencing, FCR as isolating, and finding support. This qualitative study examined the experiences of family caregivers living with FCR. Our findings highlight that relational factors shape how family caregivers experience and manage their FCR. High-quality survivorship care should be redefined to include FCR interventions tailored to family caregivers.

29 January 2025 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJani Lamarche
Jani Lamarche
RNRinat Nissim
Rinat Nissim
JAJonathan Avery
Jonathan Avery
JWJiahui Wong
Jiahui Wong
Christine MaheuChristine Maheu
Christine Maheu
SLSophie Lebel
Sophie Lebel
Objective: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common, persistent, and associated with lower quality of life, impaired functioning, and psychological distress in family caregivers (FC) of individuals with a cancer diagnosis. Interventions are needed to specifically target FCR in FC. This study aimed to pilot test the adapted Family Caregiver—Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FC‐FORT) to establish its feasibility, acceptability, and clinical significance.Methods: This pilot study used a mixed‐method, parallel, two‐group randomized control trial (FC‐FORT vs. waitlist control group) design. Women FC were recruited through Canadian hospitals, community partners, and social media. FC in the intervention group completed 7 weekly sessions of virtual group therapy (FC‐FORT) and an exit interview. All participants completed questionnaires at baseline, post‐intervention, and 3‐month follow‐up. Feasibility (e.g., recruitment, allocation, fidelity), acceptability (e.g., dropout, completion, satisfaction) and clinical significance of secondary outcomes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, mixed ANOVAs, and conventional content analyses were used.Results: Regarding feasibility, 22 FC were recruited, 18 were randomized and therapist fidelity was 87%. As to acceptability, 67% of participants completed 5 sessions (33% dropout). Questionnaire completion rate was 92%. FC satisfaction was 80%. Analyses did not reveal any significant differences on the secondary outcomes between groups. Qualitative analyses revealed high importance, helpfulness, satisfaction, and group cohesion. Suggestions were made by FC for improvements.Conclusions: This is one of the first interventions to address FCR in FC. While acceptability of FC‐FORT was good, important feasibility issues need to be addressed before moving forward with a larger randomized control trial.Trial Registration: NCT, NCT05441384. Registered July 1st, 2022, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05441384

19 November 2024 in Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJani Lamarche
Jani Lamarche
RNRinat Nissim
Rinat Nissim
JAJonathan Avery
Jonathan Avery
JWJiahui Wong
Jiahui Wong
CMChristine Maheu
Christine Maheu
SLSophie Lebel
Sophie Lebel
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common, persistent, and is associated with lower quality of life, impaired functioning, and psychological distress in cancer patients. Studies suggest that family caregivers of cancer patients experience equal or greater levels of FCR than patients themselves. In the past 5 years, several interventions have demonstrated their ability to reduce FCR among cancer patients and in patient-caregiver dyads. However, to date, no intervention exists to individually target family caregiver’s FCR. The aims of the proposed pilot study are to (1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of the newly adapted Family Caregiver–Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT) intervention to inform a larger randomized control trial study, and (2) estimate the clinical significance of FC-FORT. Initial evaluation of FC-FORT revealed high user satisfaction and usability. A parallel, two-group, pilot randomized controlled trial comparing FC-FORT to a waitlist control (care as usual) will be conducted. Participant inclusion criteria are (a) women family caregivers taking care of adult cancer patients (no recurrence), (b) experiencing clinical levels of FCR, (c) access to a computer/internet connection, and (d) living in Canada. Participants (n = 36) will be recruited at Ottawa and Toronto hospitals, previous study participant pools, through social media and community partners across Canada. Participants in the intervention group will complete the FC-FORT intervention (7 consecutive weeks of virtual group therapy and homework). Participants in the control group will be offered the intervention after their participation in the study. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaire packages at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (7 weeks; T1) and at 3-months post-intervention (T2). Feasibility (e.g., recruitment, allocation, fidelity), acceptability (e.g., dropout, completion, satisfaction) and clinical significance of secondary outcomes will be evaluated (i.e., FCR illness uncertainty). Participants in the intervention group will be asked to complete measures of group cohesion and therapeutic alliance and take part in a semi-structured exit interview exploring their overall experience with FC-FORT. This project will evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the newly adapted FC-FORT to inform a larger trial. NCT, NCT05441384. Registered July 1st, 2022, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05441384

1 December 2019 in Psycho-Oncologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJani Lamarche
Jani Lamarche
JGJ. Grenier
J. Grenier
MLM.-F. Lafontaine
M.-F. Lafontaine
PGPaul Greenman
Paul Greenman
JGJ. Gosselin
J. Gosselin
Sophie LebelSophie Lebel
Sophie Lebel
Objectifs : Offrir une thérapie par videoconference pour soulager la peur de la récidive du cancer (PRC) par l’entremise de la vidéoconférence. Déterminer la faisabilité et l’efficacité de ce traitement dans un contexte clinique. Matériel et méthodes : Thérapie par vidéoconférence cognitivoexistentielle une fois par semaine pour six semaines. Résultats : Diminution progressive de la PRC et de la détresse psychologique reliée au cancer. Satisfaction adequate de la vidéoconférence. Conclusion : L’utilisation de la vidéoconférence permettrait à un plus grand nombre de survivants de cancer d’être traités pour leur PRC.