Thatsaphan Srithongkul

Dr. Thatsaphan Srithongkul


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 March 2021 in Annals of Medicine & Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DTDuangrat Tanratananon
Duangrat Tanratananon
SDSoawarat Deekae
Soawarat Deekae
SRSukit Raksasuk
Sukit Raksasuk
TSThatsaphan Srithongkul
Thatsaphan Srithongkul
ISPD recommends culture-negative peritonitis in each peritoneal dialysis (PD) center should less than 15%. The hospital in Thailand, however faced a significantly high rate of culture negative peritonitis, even using blood culture bottles technique. This study evaluates the performance of three different culture methods in detecting organisms in PD related peritonitis. A prospective cohort diagnostic study was performed in PD patients diagnosed with PD related peritonitis in Surin Hospital from October 2018 to June 2020. The Diagnosis of peritonitis was followed ISPD guidelines. PDF sample from each patient was processed by three different blood culture bottle-based techniques, including i) 50 ml PDF centrifugation, and ii) 10 ml PDF centrifugation before inoculated into blood culture bottles, and iii) inoculation into blood culture bottles without centrifugation. The sensitivities and isolated organisms were compared among the individual methods. Of 126 PD patients with clinical peritonitis, PD related peritonitis was diagnosed in 87 patients with 105 PDF analysis. PDF culture showed gram-positive organisms 34%, gram-negative organisms 41%, fungal 5.71%, and culture-negative result in 22.86%. The direct blood culture method was positive in 59.05%, while centrifugation before inoculated into blood culture bottles, has a higher percentage of positive results, 60.95% and 64.76% from 10 ml to 50 ml PDF volume; respectively. The sensitivity was 84% and 76.5% for 50 ml PDF centrifugation and blood culture without centrifugation. Large volume PDF centrifugation before inoculating into blood culture bottles may improve the positive culture rate in PD related peritonitis.

4 December 2021 in Renal Replacement Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAtthaphong Phongphithakchai
Atthaphong Phongphithakchai
PDPhongsak Dandecha
Phongsak Dandecha
SRSukit Raksasuk
Sukit Raksasuk
TSThatsaphan Srithongkul
Thatsaphan Srithongkul
The prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is on the rise worldwide. Meanwhile, the number of older people requiring dialysis therapy is increasing as a result of this population. We found that starting dialysis in an unplanned manner is a common occurrence, even for patients with nephrology follow-up. Most centers choose hemodialysis with a high rate of central venous catheter use at the time of initiation of dialysis. Current data has found that central venous catheter use is independently associated with increased mortality and high bacteremia rates. Peritoneal dialysis is one option to avoid bacteremia. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines suggests a break-in period of at least two weeks prior to an elective start of peritoneal dialysis, without mentioning urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. For unplanned ESRD patients, it is unrealistic to wait for two weeks before initiating peritoneal dialysis therapy. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis has been suggested to be a practical approach of prompt initiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter insertion, which may avoid an increased risk of central venous catheter-related complications, including bacteremia, central venous stenosis, and thrombosis associated with the temporary use of hemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis is the alternative option, and many studies have presented an interest in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Some reports have compared urgent-start hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis and found that urgent-start peritoneal dialysis is a safe and effective alternative to hemodialysis for an unplanned dialysis patient. This review aims to compare each literature report regarding techniques, prescriptions, outcomes, complications, and costs of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis.

1 November 2022 in Journal of Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRSukit Raksasuk
Sukit Raksasuk
WNWeerakit Naweera
Weerakit Naweera
SRSatit Rojwatcharapibarn
Satit Rojwatcharapibarn
TSThatsaphan Srithongkul
Thatsaphan Srithongkul

11 March 2025 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAtthaphong Phongphithakchai
Atthaphong Phongphithakchai
ATAman Tedasen
Aman Tedasen
RNRatana Netphakdee
Ratana Netphakdee
RLRattana Leelawattana
Rattana Leelawattana
TSThatsaphan Srithongkul
Thatsaphan Srithongkul
Moragot ChatatikunMoragot Chatatikun
Moragot Chatatikun
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis, leading to renal dysfunction. Dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, shows renoprotective effects beyond glucose control, but its precise molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study utilizes network pharmacology and molecular docking to elucidate its multi-target effects in CKD. Dapagliflozin’s SMILES structure was analyzed for ADMET properties. Potential targets were identified via SwissTargetPrediction, GeneCards, and SEA, and common CKD-related targets were determined. A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed, and key pathways were identified using GO and KEGG enrichment analyses. Molecular docking was conducted to validate dapagliflozin’s binding affinities with hub proteins. A total of 208 common targets were identified, including EGFR, GSK3β, and IL-6. GO and KEGG analyses highlighted key pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and AGE-RAGE, involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic regulation. Molecular docking confirmed strong binding affinities with EGFR (−8.42 kcal/mol), GSK3β (−7.70 kcal/mol), and IL-6 (−6.83 kcal/mol). Dapagliflozin exhibits multi-target therapeutic potential in CKD by modulating inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic pathways. This integrative approach enhances the understanding of its mechanisms, supporting future experimental validation and clinical application in CKD management.

1 December 2020 in Annals of Medicine & Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRSukit Raksasuk
Sukit Raksasuk
TCThanet Chaisathaphol
Thanet Chaisathaphol
CKChayanis Kositamongkol
Chayanis Kositamongkol
WCWittawat Chokvanich
Wittawat Chokvanich
PPPratya Pumuthaivirat
Pratya Pumuthaivirat
TSThatsaphan Srithongkul
Thatsaphan Srithongkul
There is currently a controversy for the optimal vascular access option in the elderly, regarding their multiple comorbidities and life expectancies. Our study aimed to compare the survival of tunneled cuff venous catheter (CVC) and arteriovenous access (AV access) in elderly patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed by electronic medical record review. All hemodialysis patients aged 65 years and over who firstly initiated dialysis from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016 at Siriraj hospital, Thailand, were included. The primary outcomes are to compare a 2-year period of survival between CVC and AV access in terms of abandonment, death, and combined outcome. Propensity score covariate and Charlson Comorbidity Score (CCI) were used for multivariable analysis adjustment. A total of 359 patients were included; 216 (60.2%) patients had initiated hemodialysis via CVC while the rest used AV access. The patients’ average ages were 76.7 ± 7.0 and 74.0 ± 5.8 years (p-value<0.001) in the CVC and AV access group, respectively. The 2-year mortality rates of CVC and AV access groups were 24.1% and 15.4%, respectively (p-value = 0.038). Multivariable analyses showed that the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of combined endpoints, i.e., vascular access abandonment and death, was statistically different only in the CCI-adjusted model (aHR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46–0.99). Mortality from infection cause was more common in the CVC group than the AV access group. CVC access maybe considers an alternative option for frail elderly patients. However, the patient selection is a crucial issue, given higher infection-related mortality in patients using CVC.