Ming-Chao Wang

Mr. Ming-Chao Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLei Wang
Lei Wang
MWMing-Chao Wang
Ming-Chao Wang
YZYuanrong Zhang
Yuanrong Zhang
JMJian Ma
Jian Ma
HSHongyu Shao
Hongyu Shao
ZCZhixing Chang
Zhixing Chang
In the product design and manufacturing process, the effective management and representation of system requirements (SRs) are crucial for ensuring product quality and consistency. However, current methods are hindered by document ambiguity, weak requirement interdependencies, and limited semantic expressiveness in model-based systems engineering. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a prompt-driven integrated framework that synergizes large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs (KGs) to automate the visualization of SR text and structured knowledge extraction. Specifically, this paper introduces a template for information extraction tailored to arbitrary requirement documents, designed around five SysML-defined SR categories: functional requirements, interface requirements, performance requirements, physical requirements, and design constraints. By defining structured elements for each category and leveraging the GPT-4 model to extract key information from unstructured texts, the system can effectively extract and present the structured requirement information. Furthermore, the system constructs a knowledge graph to represent system requirements, visually illustrating the interdependencies and constraints between them. A case study applying this approach to Chapters 18–22 of the ‘Code for Design of Metro’ demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method in automating requirement representation, enhancing requirement traceability, and improving management. Moreover, a comparison of information extraction accuracy between GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo, BERT, and RoBERTa using the same dataset reveals that GPT-4 achieves an overall extraction accuracy of 84.76% compared to 79.05% for GPT-3.5-turbo and 59.05% for both BERT and RoBERTa. This proves the effectiveness of the proposed method in information extraction and provides a new technical pathway for intelligent requirement management.