Drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) designed to remove natural organic matter (NOM) are challenged as concentrations of NOM in raw waters are increasing. Here, we assess seasonal differences in NOM quality and quantity, from raw waters to the distribution network, at three large DWTPs in Oslo, Stockholm and Helsinki. Samples, collected during stable stratification in both winter and summer and during the autumnal turnover, were analysed for NOM concentrations and composition. The NOM was characterized by common routine parameters, size and content (TFF, LC-OCD, fluorescence) and biodegradability. The NOM concentration decreased to 2.5 mg/L (55%), 4.0 mg/L (48%) and 5.7 mg/L (76%) at the respective DWTPs in Oslo, Stockholm and Helsinki. The NOM in raw waters were predominantly in the largest size fraction (>50 kDa), in particular from Oslo. High MW fractions >50 kDa and humics remained the largest fractions with minimum 30% and maximum 80% of the total NOM. The BDOC in treated water <0.3 mg/L and the conditions in the distribution network imply low probability for bacteria regrowth. The multi-step treatment consisting of coagulation/flocculation, sedimentation, rapid sand filtration, ozonation and biological activated carbon filtration (BAC) was most effective in removing NOM. Coagulation/flocculation followed by sedimentation and sand filtration were critical, especially for the removal of biopolymers and humics, and somewhat for building blocks. The sand filtration provided up to 25% additional removal of biopolymers and below 7% removal of other fractions. The ozonation and BAC was more effective and removed 11% of biopolymers, and about 35% of building blocks and LMW neutrals.

The effectivity of different treatment stages at two large wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in Oslo, Norway, to remove antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli from municipal wastewater was investigated. The WWTPs were effective in reducing the total cultivable E. coli. The E. coli in WWTP samples were mainly resistant to ampicillin (6–27%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5–24%), and, to a lesser extent, tetracycline (3–14%) and ciprofloxacin (0–7%). In the first WWTP, a clear decrease in the percentage of E. coli resistant to these antibiotics was found, with the main removal occurring during physical/chemical treatment. In the second WWTP, the percentage of cultivable resistant E. coli did not display a considerable change. During lab-scale membrane filtration of WWTP effluents using ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes, all E. coli, including those resistant to antibiotics, were removed completely. The results imply that UF and NF processes are potent measures to remove antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) during post-treatment of WWTP effluents, thus reducing the potential spread of antibiotic resistance in the receiving aquatic environment.

In many parts of the world, drinking water storage takes place in near-house or in-house tanks. This can impact drinking water quality considerably. International and numerous national standards and guidelines addressing the construction, installation and operation of domestic drinking water storage tanks are reviewed on their consideration of water quality aspects and the minimisation of health risks associated with drinking water storage. Several national and international standards and guidelines are reviewed in terms of drinking water quality requirements. Factors that have an impact on water quality in relation to the use of domestic drinking water storage tanks are summarised comprehensively. The impact of the domestic storage of drinking water on water quality, the points and locations of use, their positioning, the materials they are made of, their design and operation, as well as aspects of how they are operated and maintained is outlined and discussed in detail. Finally, the incorporation of aspects regarding water quality in drinking water storage tanks in standards and guidelines is presented and assessed. To make the use of domestic drinking water storage tanks safer and more efficient, recommendations for modifications, improvements and extensions of respective standards are made.

Geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) are two substances causing earthy/musty odours that are difficult to remove by conventional chemical drinking water treatment. In this study removal of geosmin and MIB by biofiltration of untreated surface water was investigated using granular activated carbon (GAC) and crushed expanded clay (EC) as filter media. Biofiltration through both GAC and EC removed geosmin and MIB present at low (20 ng l⁻¹) concentrations by at least 97 % at an empty bed contact time of 30 minutes and a temperature of 15°C. At lower temperature (6-12°C) and simultaneously lower biomass concentrations, removal efficiency was similar in the GAC but considerably lower in the EC biofilter, pointing to a second mechanism different from biodegradation. Consequently, microbial activity was suppressed with azide to enable discrimination between biodegradation and adsorption. During azide dosage, the GAC biofilters still removed geosmin and MIB nearly unaffectedly. In the EC biofilter, however, removal of both odorants ceased completely. Methylene blue adsorption confirmed that the GAC, even after almost four years of operation receiving surface water, had capacity to remove geosmin and MIB by adsorption. Since odour episodes commonly occur during the warm season when microbiological activity is high, EC constitutes a viable option as carrier medium for direct biological filtration of surface water. The additional GAC adsorption capacity however adds robustness to the removal process.