Background: Effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients has attracted attention in recent years. Objective: We analyzed the effect of anti-TNF agents on clinical findings of colchicine-resistant FMF patients with chronic arthritis and/or sacroiliitis. Methods: Data from 10 FMF patients (5 male and 5 female patients: mean age, 30.1 [SD, 8.5] years) with chronic arthritis and/or sacroiliitis who were on anti-TNF agents are reviewed. Frequency of FMF attacks before and after treatment with anti-TNF agents was recorded from hospital files. The effects of the anti-TNF treatment were determined by using the number of tender and/or swollen joints, serum acute phase reactant levels, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index scores. Change in urine protein loss was also evaluated in patients with amyloidosis. In 6 patients, FMF attacks had been considered to be unresponsive to colchicine, and 4 patients were partial responders before treatment with anti-TNF agents. Results: Mean attack frequency of the patients in the 3 months' period before anti-TNF agent treatment was 3.8 (SD, 3.1). After anti-TNF treatment, in 3 patients, FMF attack frequency decreased, and in the remaining 7 patients, no attack occurred. Serum acute phase reactant levels were decreased significantly at 3 and 6 months after anti-TNF treatment (P < 0.05 for all). After anti-TNF treatment Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index scores were also decreased significantly (6.2 [SD], 1.7 vs. 2.1 [SD], 1.7; P = 0.012). In all 3 patients with amyloidosis, urine protein loss decreased without any increase in serum creatinine levels. Conclusion: Anti-TNF treatment can have beneficial effects for controlling FMF attacks in FMF patients with chronic arthritis and/or sacroiliitis.

Objective Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) provide important information regarding disease effect. The study objective was to assess the frequency of PRO use in recent RA studies and compare results with a previous systematic review (SR) in 2005–2007. Methods An SR was performed in PubMed MEDLINE (January 2015). Publications were identified using these MEdical Subject Headings terms: “arthritis, rheumatoid” with a limitation to “humans,” “all adults: 19+ years,” “English,” “published in the last 2 years,” and “clinical trials.” All studies were assessed, whatever their designs. All PRO reported in publications were classified according to general domains of health by 2 authors. Statistics were descriptive. Results Two hundred fifty articles were analyzed. Of them, 113 (45.2%) were randomized controlled trials; 138 different PRO were reported. The most frequent PRO, similar to the 2007 SR, were function (68.0%), pain (40.0%), patient’s global assessment (49.2%), and health-related quality of life (18.4%). Fatigue (14.4%), morning stiffness (10.0%), psychological status (9.6%), productivity losses (6.4%), utility (5.2%), sleep disturbance (2.4%), and coping (2.0%) were rarely reported. Although frequent domains were reported using well-validated questionnaires, the others were reported using heterogeneous questionnaires. Conclusion The PRO collected and reported in RA studies are remarkably consistent with those seen in 2005–2007, and reflect the existing RA Core Set measures. Other domains of health prioritized by patients including fatigue, psychological status, productivity losses, sleep disturbance, and coping remain rarely reported. Further, heterogeneity in outcome measures used presents challenges in interpreting true disease effect and response to therapy.

Clinical aspects; Authors: E.C. Bolek, U. Kaya Akca, A. Sari, E. Sag, S. Demir, L. Kilic, Y.Z. Sener, H.H. Aykan, E.B. Kaya, Y. Bilginer, A. Akdogan, S. Kiraz, O. Karadag, S. Ozen