Jeannette Schenk

Dr. Jeannette Schenk


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
LNLisa F. Newcomb
Lisa F. Newcomb
YZYingye Zheng
Yingye Zheng
AFAnna V. Faino
Anna V. Faino
KZKehao Zhu
Kehao Zhu
DLDaniel W. Lin
Daniel W. Lin
Purpose:In a large, prospective, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort we evaluated whether African American men are at higher risk for reclassification.Materials and Methods:The Canary PA...

29 January 2019 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSepehr Makhsous
Sepehr Makhsous
HMHashem M. Mohammad
Hashem M. Mohammad
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
AMAlexander V. Mamishev
Alexander V. Mamishev
AKAlan R. Kristal
Alan R. Kristal
Over the past ten years, diabetes has rapidly become more prevalent in all age demographics and especially in children. Improved dietary assessment techniques are necessary for epidemiological studies that investigate the relationship between diet and disease. Current nutritional research is hindered by the low accuracy of traditional dietary intake estimation methods used for portion size assessment. This paper presents the development and validation of a novel instrumentation system for measuring accurate dietary intake for diabetic patients. This instrument uses a mobile Structured Light System (SLS), which measures the food volume and portion size of a patient’s diet in daily living conditions. The SLS allows for the accurate determination of the volume and portion size of a scanned food item. Once the volume of a food item is calculated, the nutritional content of the item can be estimated using existing nutritional databases. The system design includes a volume estimation algorithm and a hardware add-on that consists of a laser module and a diffraction lens. The experimental results demonstrate an improvement of around 40% in the accuracy of the volume or portion size measurement when compared to manual calculation. The limitations and shortcomings of the system are discussed in this manuscript.

30 September 2015 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSarah H. Nash
Sarah H. Nash
CTCathee Till
Cathee Till
XSXiaoling Song
Xiaoling Song
MLM. Scott Lucia
M. Scott Lucia
HPHoward L. Parnes
Howard L. Parnes
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
Background: Findings from epidemiologic studies examining associations of serum retinol and carotenoids with prostate cancer risk have been inconsistent. This case–control study nested in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial evaluated associations of serum retinol and carotenoids with total, low-, and high-grade prostate cancer risk in a highly screened study population. Methods: We used logistic regression adjusting for age, family history of prostate cancer, race, body mass index, and serum cholesterol to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of prostate cancer by quartiles of serum retinol and carotenoids, separately in the placebo (975 cases/1,009 frequency-matched controls) and finasteride (708 cases/743 frequency-matched controls) arms of the trial. Results: Serum retinol concentrations were associated with increased risk of total prostate cancer [OR (95% CI) comparing the highest quartile of serum retinol with the lowest: 1.30 (1.00–1.68)] and high-grade prostate cancer [OR (95% CI), 1.74 (1.14–2.68)] in the placebo arm of the trial only. Also in the placebo arm, there was a moderate positive association of α-carotene with risk of total prostate cancer [OR (95% CI), 1.32 (1.01–1.73)]. None of the other carotenoids was associated with prostate cancer risk in the placebo arm. No associations were observed for retinol and carotenoids in the finasteride arm. Conclusion: In the placebo arm of this prospective study, high serum retinol and α-carotene concentrations were associated with increased risk of total and high-grade prostate cancers. Impact: Men with higher levels of serum retinol and α-carotene may be at increased risk for prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(10); 1507–15. ©2015 AACR.

20 November 2015 in Cancer Causes & Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
CTCathee Till
Cathee Till
AHAnn W. Hsing
Ann W. Hsing
FSFrank Z. Stanczyk
Frank Z. Stanczyk
ZGZhihong Gong
Zhihong Gong
ITIan M. Thompson
Ian M. Thompson

1 June 2019 in Contemporary Clinical Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
MNMarian L. Neuhouser
Marian L. Neuhouser
SBSarah J. Beatty
Sarah J. Beatty
MVMatthew VanDoren
Matthew VanDoren
DLDaniel W. Lin
Daniel W. Lin
JWJonathan L. Wright
Jonathan L. Wright

12 April 2017 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFayth Miles
Fayth Miles
PGPhyllis J. Goodman
Phyllis J. Goodman
CTCatherine Tangen
Catherine Tangen
KTKathleen C. Torkko
Kathleen C. Torkko
JSJeannette Schenk
Jeannette Schenk
MNMarian L Neuhouser
Marian L Neuhouser
Some, but not all, epidemiologic studies report an association between vitamin D and prostate cancer risk. The inconsistent findings might be explained in the context of modification by members of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis. Data and specimens for this nested case-control study (n = 1695 cases and n = 1682 controls) are from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT). Baseline serum samples were assayed for 25(OH)D, IGF-1, IGF-2, IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, and the ratio of IGF1:BP3, along with insulin-related markers c-peptide and leptin. The presence of prostate cancer was assessed by prostate biopsy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prostate cancer risk. There were no interactions between serum 25(OH)D and IGF analytes in relation to prostate cancer risk when PCPT treatment arms were combined. In the placebo arm, above median serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with increased risk of prostate cancer among men with higher IGF-2 (OR:1.33, 95% CI: 1.00–1.65), with a significant interaction between 25(OH)D and treatment arm (Pinteraction = 0.04). Additionally, there was an interaction between treatment arm and serum IGFBP-3 (Pinteraction = 0.03). Higher serum 25(OH)D may increase risk of prostate cancer in the presence of higher circulating IGF-2.