During home treatment with antibiotics, patients’ laboratory results of total white blood cell count (WBC) with neutrophil counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) are drawn and monitored at the hospita...

The transition from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) is known to be difficult. For young persons

Background/Objectives: Critical lung infection affects alveolar cells and probably also their ability to perform surfactant procedures, but bedside tools for monitoring lung surfactants are lacking. In this descriptive exploratory study, we aimed to evaluate lung surfactant levels in bronchial aspirate (BA) from patients admitted to the intensive care unit due to severe respiratory failure. Methods: Bronchial aspirates were collected from nine patients (median age: 72 years, range: 52–85) who required orotracheal intubation. Samples were obtained within 24 h of mechanical ventilation initiation (T1), after three days on a ventilator (T2), and on day seven (T3) for four patients. The concentration of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), a key surfactant component, was assessed in the lamellar body precipitate. Results: Across the nine patients at T1, the DPPC level was 12 µM (range: 3–20 µM). By T2, the DPPC level declined to 8 µM (range: 2–22 µM), with a statistically significant decrease from T1 (p = 0.0039). At T3, the DPPC level in four patients ranged from 2 to 5 µM, though the difference from T2 was not statistically significant. A surfactant biomarker would assist clinical decision-making when dealing with patients in severe respiratory failure where exogenous surfactant therapy may be considered. Conclusions: DPPC levels obtained from bronchial aspirate can be measured in patients with severe respiratory failure and may serve as a useful biomarker for lung surfactant status, which suggests the potential for bedside assessment in clinical practice with a dedicated test device.

Objective To explore patients’ experiences and preferences of self-testing using white cell count point-of-care test (POCT) and C reactive protein POCT during antibiotic treatment at home. Setting A University Hospital in the Region of Zealand (DK). Participants 10 inpatients treated with antibiotics who were discharged from hospital to continue antibiotic treatment at home. They were trained in the hospital supervised by research personnel before self-testing at home. Design An explorative qualitative study using thematic analysis. Results The participants considered the self-testing beneficial, mainly due to not having to travel to get a blood test drawn, the rapid test time and the ability to closely monitor their treatment. The participants perceived that self-testing at home would make them feel more in control of their disease and would give them the ability to live a more normal life. Moreover, self-testing at home showed to be feasible for some patients but with barriers to overcome, such as the ability to use technology and cognitive challenges. Conclusions Our study showed that self-testing at home was feasible for some patients, provided they received thorough training at the hospital ensuring that participants were able to conduct the self-testing and use the smartphone technology before transitioning to their home. This could help reduce barriers to home self-testing by highlighting its benefits and emphasising the need for adequate patient guidance and support.