Background: Hepatobiliary liver cancers (HBLCs) represent the sixth most common neoplasm in the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) constitute the main HBLC types, with alarming epidemiological projections. Methods: In recent decades, alterations in gut microbiota, with mutual implications on the gut–liver axis and gut–biliary axis permeability status, have been massively investigated and proposed as HBLC pathogenetic deus ex machina. Results: In the HCC setting, elevated intestinal levels of Escherichia coli and other Gram-negative bacteria have been demonstrated, resulting in a close association with increased lipopolysaccharide (LPS) serum levels and, consequently, chronic systemic inflammation. In contrast, the intestinal microbiota of HCC individuals feature reduced levels of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and Enterococcus spp. In the CC setting, evidence has revealed an increased expression of Lactobacillus spp., with enhanced levels of Actynomices spp. and Alloscardovia spp. Besides impaired strains/species representation, gut-derived metabolites, including bile acids (BAs), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and oxidative-stress-derived products, configure a network severely impacting the progression of HBLC. Conclusions: In the era of Precision Medicine, the clarification of microbiota composition and functioning in HCC and CC settings can contribute to the identification of individual signatures, potentially providing novel diagnostic markers, therapeutic approaches, and prognostic/predictive tools.

Background/Objectives: Fonte Essenziale^®, a mineral water rich in bicarbonate, sulfate, calcium, and magnesium, has shown potential in modulating the gut–liver axis and microbiota in hepatic steatosis. However, its long-term effects on intestinal permeability (IP), systemic inflammation (SI), and oxidative stress—key factors in Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)—remain unexplored. Methods: Eighty-seven MASLD patients were randomized into two groups: group A received Fonte Essenziale^® (400 mL/day, fasting) plus a controlled nutritional regimen for 12 months, followed by a 6-month water washout; group B followed only the controlled nutritional regimen. IP markers, SI (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), oxidative stress (dROMs/BAP), and clinical data (including Controlled Attenuation Parameter—CAP) were assessed at baseline (T0), 12 months (T12), and post-washout (T18). Baseline increased IP (in-IP) was defined by fecal zonulin > 110 ng/mL and serum LBPp > 10 µg/mL; improvement (im-IP) required normalization of both. A ≥30% CAP reduction indicated steatosis improvement. Results: Thirty-eight patients in group A and thirty-nine in group B completed the study. At T12, group A showed significant reductions in fecal zonulin (p: 0.0163) and serum LBPp (p < 0.0001), with increased occludin and claudin 1 (all p < 0.0001). Im-IP prevalence was higher in group A (p: 0.0037). Group A also showed significant reductions in IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, LPS, and dROM/BAP (all p < 0.05), especially among those with im-IP. CAP, insulin, and HDL levels improved significantly (all p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed water intake (aOR: 2.185, p: 0.001) and im-IP achievement (aHR: 1.267, p: 0.021) as predictors of steatosis improvement. Benefits persisted at T18. Conclusions: Prolonged Fonte Essenziale^® intake improved hepatic steatosis and MASLD outcomes by modulating IP, SI, and oxidative stress. This trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07211113).

The term “plastics” is an umbrella term generally referring to any material containing a high level of polymer content as an essential ingredient. Micro(nano)plastics (MNPs) are derived from the degradation of plastics, representing exogenous substances whose exposure can potentially interfere with different physiological processes. In this scenario, even considering the relative paramount detoxification role, the liver emerges as a key active organ in the relationship between plastic exposure and human disease. In industrialized countries, where plastics constitute largely diffused components of objects routinely adopted in daily/social life, including food packaging, Metabolic dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) represents the predominant hepatopathy and is progressively becoming the leading cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer, with an incompletely elucidated multifactorial pathogenesis. Notably, oral exposure to MNPs has been revealed to impact the gut–liver axis by influencing gut microbiota composition, gastrointestinal absorption, and, ultimately, determining hepatic accumulation. At the hepatic level, MNPs can contribute to the onset and worsening of steatosis by inducing metabolic dysfunction and inflammation. Plastics can also serve as vectors for different potentially toxic additives, with specific MNPs constituting a persistent source of release of bisphenol A (BPA), a well-recognized exogenous etiological factor contributing to MASLD genesis and worsening. Recently, exposure to MNPs and additives has demonstrated significant impacts on the immune system, oxidative stress, and metabolism. In particular, polystyrene-derived MNPs impair the mechanisms regulating hepatic lipid metabolism, simultaneously acting as antigens abnormally triggering the innate immune response. At the same time, environmental BPA exposure has been revealed to trigger trained immunity-related pathways, configuring novel pathogenetic drivers potentially promoting the progression of MASLD. The present review, after rapidly overviewing the main sources and toxicological properties of MNPs and related additives, explores plastic-related exposure’s potential implications in the genesis and progression of hepatic steatosis, highlighting the urgent need for further clarification of relative pathogenetic mechanisms.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a heterogeneous autoimmune liver disease in which clinical presentation, disease progression, and response to therapy vary markedly from patient to patient. This heterogeneity reflects its complex, multifactorial, and not-completely elucidated pathogenesis. Currently, serological markers are available to non-invasively diagnose PBC, reserving liver biopsy for selected cases with atypical presentations or diagnostic uncertainty. Anyway, the accurate non-invasive prediction of liver-related and non-liver-related (i.e., extra-hepatic, including pruritus) outcomes remains an open challenge, as well as an urgent need, considering the great variability in clinical course and prognosis reported in PBC patients. Moreover, although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the standard first-line treatment, not all individuals respond equally, either in terms of therapeutic efficacy or timing of biochemical improvement. This further variability in treatment response underscores the inadequacy of uniform management approaches and reinforces the urgent need for personalized medicine, where treatment decisions are guided by patient-specific biological and clinical parameters. In this scenario, the identification and validation of non-invasive predictive biomarkers capable of detecting early therapeutic responsiveness are pivotal for optimizing care pathways. Finally, a growing portion of patients show an insufficient UDCA response or are UDCA intolerant, making the identification of novel strategies of care an urgent need. Concerning this, very recently, new therapeutic options beyond UDCA targeting, among the other pathways, bile acid metabolism (including the modern Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor agonists), immune regulation, and fibrogenesis, have expanded the treatment landscape. In the Era of Precision Medicine, these diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic innovations, by reflecting the complexity of PBC pathogenesis, underline the cruciality of a patient-tailored strategy to improve outcomes and mitigate disease progression. The present review reports recent advances, highlights ongoing challenges, and outlines future perspectives in the management of PBC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major global health challenge and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Its epidemiological burden is rapidly increasing, largely driven by the rising prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which is now recognized as the most common chronic liver disease globally. Notably, MASLD frequently coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), sharing several features, including the interplay of common genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors, thus contributing to a complex multifactorial pathogenesis. Relevantly, patients affected by both conditions represent a subgroup at particularly high risk of liver disease progression and hepatocarcinogenesis. In this population, metabolic and inflammatory disturbances act synergistically to create a pro-tumorigenic hepatic environment where insulin resistance (IR) plays a crucial role, by driving hepatic lipotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammatory signaling with oxidative stress, thereby establishing a permissive environment for worsening steatosis and malignant transformation. Increasing evidence supports the concept of MASLD as a multisystem disorder reflecting the systemic nature of metabolic dysfunction. Within this framework, beyond IR, extrahepatic factors have also emerged as important contributors to steatosis progression, worsening of T2DM, and modulation of HCC risk. In particular, the gut–liver axis has gained recognition as a key regulator of hepatic homeostasis, integrating signals from the intestinal microbiota, immune responses, and metabolic pathways. Dysregulation of this crosstalk promotes systemic inflammation and metabolic imbalance, exacerbating IR and fostering a pro-oncogenic hepatic environment. This review examines the interconnected metabolic and immune mechanisms linking IR and gut–liver axis dysfunction to HCC development in patients with MASLD and T2DM, highlighting their implications for risk stratification and precision-based therapeutic strategies.