Langerhans cells (LC) are dendritic cells of the epidermis. They are highly specialized leukocytes that serve immunogenic and tolerogenic purposes. Here, we review some aspects of LC biology, emphasizing those areas where LC are or may turn out to be special.
16 May 2006 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Dendritic cells (DC) efficiently cross-present exogenous antigen on MHC class I molecules to CD8+T cells. However, little is known about cross-presentation by Langerhans cells (LC), the DCs of the epidermis. Therefore, we investigated this issue in detail. Isolated murine LCs were able to cross-present soluble ovalbumin protein on MHC-class I molecules to antigen-specific CD8+T cells, albeit less potently than the CD8+DC subsets from spleen. Furthermore, LCs cross-presented cell-associated ovalbumin peptide and protein expressed by neighboring keratinocytes. Use of transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP-1)-deficient mice suggested a TAP-dependent pathway. Similar observations were made with migratory LC. Antigen expressed in the epidermis was ingested by LCs during migration from the epidermis and presented to antigen-specific T cellsin vitro. Cross-presentation of ovalbumin protein by LCs induced IFN-γ production and cytotoxicity in antigen-specific CD8+T cells. Additionally, epicutaneous application of ovalbumin protein inducedin vivoproliferation of OT-I T cells in the draining lymph nodes; this was markedly enhanced when antigen was applied to inflamed, barrier-disrupted skin. Thus, LCs cross-present exogenous antigen to CD8+T cells and induce effector functions, like cytokine production and cytotoxicity, and may thereby critically contribute in epicutaneous vaccination approaches.
The dual erbB1/2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib as well as the anthracycline doxorubicin are both used in the therapy of HER2‐positive breast cancer. Using MMTV‐neu mice as an animal model for HER2‐positive breast cancer, we observed enhanced tumor infiltration by IFN‐γ‐secreting T cells after treatment with doxorubicin and/or lapatinib. Antibody depletion experiments revealed a contribution of CD8+ but not CD4+ T cells to the antitumor effect of these drugs. Doxorubicin treatment additionally decreased the content of immunosuppressive tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) in the tumor bed. In contrast, Stat1‐deficient mice were resistant to tumor growth inhibition by lapatinib and/or doxorubicin and exhibited impaired T‐cell activation and reduced T‐cell infiltration of the tumor in response to drug treatment. Furthermore, Stat1‐deficiency resulted in reduced expression of the T‐cell chemotactic factors CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in the tumor epithelium. The inhibition of TAM infiltration of the tumor by doxorubicin and the immunosuppressive function of TAMs were found to be Stat1 independent. Taken together, the results point to an important contribution toward enhancing T‐cell and IFN‐γ‐based immunity by lapatinib as well as doxorubicin and emphasize the role of Stat1 in building an effective antitumor immune response.
1 March 2010 in Journal of Investigative Dermatology