Donald M Lloyd-Jones

Prof. Donald M Lloyd-Jones


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2010 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDonald M Lloyd-Jones
Donald M Lloyd-Jones
YHYuling Hong
Yuling Hong
DLDarwin Labarthe
Darwin Labarthe
DMDariush Mozaffarian
Dariush Mozaffarian
LALawrence J. Appel
Lawrence J. Appel
WRWayne D. Rosamond
Wayne D. Rosamond
This document details the procedures and recommendations of the Goals and Metrics Committee of the Strategic Planning Task Force of the American Heart Association, which developed the 2020 Impact Goals for the organization. The committee was charged with defining a new concept, cardiovascular health , and determining the metrics needed to monitor it over time. Ideal cardiovascular health, a concept well supported in the literature, is defined by the presence of both ideal health behaviors (nonsmoking, body mass index <25 kg/m 2 , physical activity at goal levels, and pursuit of a diet consistent with current guideline recommendations) and ideal health factors (untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL, untreated blood pressure <120/<80 mm Hg, and fasting blood glucose <100 mg/dL). Appropriate levels for children are also provided. With the use of levels that span the entire range of the same metrics, cardiovascular health status for the whole population is defined as poor, intermediate, or ideal. These metrics will be monitored to determine the changing prevalence of cardiovascular health status and define achievement of the Impact Goal. In addition, the committee recommends goals for further reductions in cardiovascular disease and stroke mortality. Thus, the committee recommends the following Impact Goals: “By 2020, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%.” These goals will require new strategic directions for the American Heart Association in its research, clinical, public health, and advocacy programs for cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention in the next decade and beyond.

24 June 2014 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDavid C. Goff
David C. Goff
DLDonald M Lloyd-Jones
Donald M Lloyd-Jones
GBGlen Bennett
Glen Bennett
SCSean Coady
Sean Coady
RDRalph B. D’agostino
Ralph B. D’agostino
PWPeter W. F. Wilson
Peter W. F. Wilson

1 February 2011 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VRVéronique L. Roger
Véronique L. Roger
AGAlan S. Go
Alan S. Go
DLDonald M Lloyd-Jones
Donald M Lloyd-Jones
RARobert J. Adams
Robert J. Adams
JBJarett D. Berry
Jarett D. Berry
JWJudith Wylie-Rosett
Judith Wylie-Rosett
In light of the current national focus on healthcare utilization, costs, and quality, it is critical to monitor and understand the magnitude of healthcare delivery and costs, as well as the quality of healthcare delivery, related to CVDs. The Update provides these critical data in several sections. Chapter 20 reviews many metrics related to the quality of care delivered to patients with CVDs, as well as healthcare disparities. In particular, quality data are available from the AHA’s “Get With The Guidelines” programs for coronary artery disease and heart failure and the American Stroke Association/ AHA’s “Get With the Guidelines” program for acute stroke. Similar data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration, national Medicare and Medicaid data and National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network - “Get With The Guidelines” Registry data are also reviewed. These data show impressive adherence with guideline recommendations for many, but not all, metrics of quality of care for these hospitalized patients. Data are also reviewed on screening for cardiovascular risk factor levels and control. Chapter 21 provides data on trends and current usage of cardiovascular surgical and invasive procedures. For example, the total number of inpatient cardiovascular operations and procedures increased 27%, from 5 382 000 in 1997 to 6 846 000 in 2007 (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute computation based on National Center for Health Statistics annual data). Chapter 22 reviews current estimates of direct and indirect healthcare costs related to CVDs, stroke, and related conditions using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. The total direct and indirect cost of CVD and stroke in the United States for 2007 is estimated to be $286 billion. This figure includes health expenditures (direct costs, which include the cost of physicians and other professionals, hospital services, prescribed medications, home health care, and other medical durables) and lost productivity resulting from mortality (indirect costs). By comparison, in 2008, the estimated cost of all cancer and benign neoplasms was $228 billion ($93 billion in direct costs, $19 billion in morbidity indirect costs, and $116 billion in mortality indirect costs). CVD costs more than any other diagnostic group. The AHA, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current data available in the Statistics Update. The 2007 mortality data have been released. More information can be found at the National Center for Health Statistics Web site, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_01.pdf. Finally, it must be noted that this annual Statistical Update is the product of an entire year’s worth of effort by dedicated professionals, volunteer physicians and scientists, and outstanding AHA staff members, without whom publication of this valuable resource would be impossible. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged. Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH, FAHA Melanie B. Turner, MPH On behalf of the American Heart Association Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics Writing Group Note: Population data used in the compilation of NHANES prevalence estimates is for the latest year of the NHANES survey being used. Extrapolations for NHANES prevalence estimates are based on the census resident population for 2008 because this is the most recent year of NHANES data used in the Statistical Update.

1 July 2014 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNeil J. Stone
Neil J. Stone
JRJennifer G. Robinson
Jennifer G. Robinson
ALAlice H. Lichtenstein
Alice H. Lichtenstein
C. Noel Bairey MerzC. Noel Bairey Merz
C. Noel Bairey Merz
CBConrad B. Blum
Conrad B. Blum
PWPeter W.F. Wilson
Peter W.F. Wilson

1 January 2012 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WMWriting Group Members
Writing Group Members
VRVéronique L. Roger
Véronique L. Roger
AGAlan S. Go
Alan S. Go
DLDonald M Lloyd-Jones
Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Emelia J. BenjaminEmelia J. Benjamin
Emelia J. Benjamin
MTMelanie B. Turner
Melanie B. Turner

24 June 2014 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNeil J. Stone
Neil J. Stone
JRJennifer G. Robinson
Jennifer G. Robinson
ALAlice H. Lichtenstein
Alice H. Lichtenstein
C. Noel Bairey MerzC. Noel Bairey Merz
C. Noel Bairey Merz
CBConrad B. Blum
Conrad B. Blum
PWPeter W. F. Wilson
Peter W. F. Wilson