Chaegwan Kong

Dr. Chaegwan Kong

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YKYang-Soo Kim
Yang-Soo Kim
HLHyo-Jin Lee
Hyo-Jin Lee
YKYoon-Vin Kim
Yoon-Vin Kim
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong

13 June 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong
JPJong-Beom Park
Jong-Beom Park
Apoptosis plays a crucial role in the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD), a significant cause of chronic low back pain. This review explores disc cell apoptosis’s cellular and molecular mechanisms, focusing on nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and cartilage endplates cells. Apoptotic pathways—intrinsic (mitochondrial), extrinsic (death receptor-mediated), ER stress-mediated, and autophagy-related—are activated by oxidative stress, inflammation, mechanical load, and metabolic disturbances like hyperglycemia. Diabetes exacerbates disc cell apoptosis through AGE-RAGE signaling and mitochondrial dysfunction. Inflammation further amplifies apoptotic cascades via cytokine signaling and ROS generation. The review also examines emerging therapeutic strategies, including antioxidants (e.g., MitoQ, resveratrol), anti-inflammatory agents (e.g., cytokine inhibitors), autophagy modulators (e.g., rapamycin, metformin), and stem cell and gene therapies. While promising preclinical results exist, challenges such as poor bioavailability and clinical translation remain. Enhanced understanding of apoptosis pathways informs future cellular preservation and matrix integrity treatments. Based on a comprehensive literature search from 2000 to 2025, this narrative review synthesizes current knowledge, identifies knowledge gaps, and discusses translational potential. Our findings support a paradigm shift toward mechanism-based therapies that address the root cause of IVDD rather than symptomatic relief alone.

1 June 2021 in Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HPHo-Youn Park
Ho-Youn Park
SKSeok Jung Kim
Seok Jung Kim
YSYoo-Joon Sur
Yoo-Joon Sur
JJJae-Woong Jung
Jae-Woong Jung
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong
Background: A midshaft clavicle fracture is a common fracture that typically responds well to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, refracture can occur after implant removal (IR). This study aimed to analyze the rate of refracture and related factors after removal of the locking compression plate (LCP) for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 201 patients who had undergone ORIF with LCP for midshaft clavicle fractures after IR after bony union from January 2011 to May 2018 at our institute. We evaluated basic demographic characteristics and radiographic parameters. All patients were treated with an LCP for primary fracture. The patients were divided into two groups: a refracture group that experienced a second fracture within 1 year after IR and a no-fracture group.Results: There were four cases (1.99%) of refracture; three were treated conservatively, while one was treated surgically. All patients achieved bony union. The average interval between refracture and IR was 64 days (range, 6–210 days). There was a significant difference in classification of fractures (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] classification) between the two groups. However, other patient demographics and radiographic measurements between refracture and IR, such as bone diameter, showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: This study showed that one in 50 patients suffered from refracture after removal of the LCP. Thus, if patients desire IR, the surgeon should explain that there is a relatively higher possibility of refracture for cases with simple or segmental fractures than for other types of fracture.

29 August 2023 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dong hwan LeeDong hwan Lee
Dong hwan Lee
HLHwa Sung Lee
Hwa Sung Lee
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong
Se-Won LeeSe-Won Lee
Se-Won Lee
Background and objectives: Isolated tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures are exceptionally uncommon among adults, with limited instances documented in published literature. Here, we describe a case of an isolated tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture in an adult that was treated successfully with the suture bridge repair technique. Patient concerns: A 65-year-old female visited the outpatient department with left knee pain after a slip and fall. Lateral radiographs and sagittal MR images of the left knee revealed the tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture, but the fracture line did not extend into the knee joint space. Surgical intervention was performed on the patient’s knee using an anterior midline approach, involving open reduction and internal fixation. The avulsed tendon was grasped and pulled, and an appropriate suture location was identified. Using a suture hook, the suture was guided through the patellar tendon as near to its uppermost point of the fragment as achievable, and tied over tendon. A single suture limb from each anchor was fastened over the tibial tuberosity to the distally positioned foot print anchor, effectively anchoring the tibial tuberosity using the suture bridge technique. The patient started walking on crutches after one week and was able to walk independently with a brace after two weeks from the operation day. After three months, the patient had regained her mobility to the level prior to the injury and exhibited painless active range of motion from 0 to 130 degrees. Hardware positioning and bony union were maintained at the one-year follow-up. Conclusions: In our case, the open suture bridge fixation method for tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures produced satisfactory results. Open suture bridge fixation may be considered for isolated tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in adults, especially when the avulsion tip is too small for screw fixation.

1 December 2020 in Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HPHo Yeon Park
Ho Yeon Park
SKSeok Jung Kim
Seok Jung Kim
YSYoo Joon Sur
Yoo Joon Sur
JJJae Woong Jung
Jae Woong Jung
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong
Background: Locked posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder (LPFDS) is a very rare injury that occurs predominantly in young patients following high-energy trauma. The long-term outcome of the treatment of this injury is often poor. This study sought to present the characteristics of injury, discuss the pathological anatomy, and to report the treatment outcomes of our case series. Methods: Between January 2012 and May 2018, a total of 234 patients who underwent surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures were reviewed. Among them, six patients (mean age, 54.7 years; range, 35–76 years) with LPFDS were included in this study. Four patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates, one with hemiarthroplasty, and one with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clinical results were evaluated by Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores and radiologic evaluation was conducted using follow-up radiographs. Results: The mean length of follow-up was 26.2 months (range, 12–54). The mean Constant, ASES, and VAS scores were 66.7, 65.5, and 2.2, respectively. Four patients who underwent ORIF achieved bony union, but avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head was observed in two patients. No complications were observed in the patients who underwent arthroplasty surgery until final follow-up. Conclusions: In the treatment of LPFDS, replacement arthroplasty can produce predictable results. The approach of ORIF may be considered as a first choice of treatment in young patients but is sometimes correlated with postoperative complications such as AVN and the functional outcomes may be unpredictable. Therefore, patients should undergo careful diagnosis and treatment of this type of injury.

17 March 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChaegwan Kong
Chaegwan Kong
JPJong-Beom Park
Jong-Beom Park
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or facet joint degeneration, necessitating revision surgery. Reoperation strategies depend on the failure mechanism, instability, sagittal malalignment, and neural compression. Anterior revision is suited for prosthesis failure, recurrent disc herniation, or ASD, enabling prosthesis removal, decompression, and fusion. In select cases, reimplantation may restore motion. Posterior approaches are preferred for facet degeneration, multilevel stenosis, or posterior hypertrophy, with options including foraminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Complex cases may require combined anterior and posterior surgery for optimal decompression and stability. This narrative review outlines revision strategies, emphasizing biomechanical assessment, radiographic evaluation, and patient-specific considerations. Despite surgical challenges, meticulous planning and execution can optimize outcomes.