Most of the known Drosophila architectural proteins interact with an important cofactor, CP190, that contains three domains (BTB, M, and D) that are involved in protein–protein interactions. The highly conserved N-terminal CP190 BTB domain forms a stable homodimer that interacts with unstructured regions in the three best-characterized architectural proteins: dCTCF, Su(Hw), and Pita. Here, we identified two new CP190 partners, CG4730 and CG31365, that interact with the BTB domain. The CP190 BTB resembles the previously characterized human BCL6 BTB domain, which uses its hydrophobic groove to specifically associate with unstructured regions of several transcriptional repressors. Using GST pull-down and yeast two-hybrid assays, we demonstrated that mutations in the hydrophobic groove strongly affect the affinity of CP190 BTB for the architectural proteins. In the yeast two-hybrid assay, we found that architectural proteins use various mechanisms to improve the efficiency of interaction with CP190. Pita and Su(Hw) have two unstructured regions that appear to simultaneously interact with hydrophobic grooves in the BTB dimer. In dCTCF and CG31365, two adjacent regions interact simultaneously with the hydrophobic groove of the BTB and the M domain of CP190. Finally, CG4730 interacts with the BTB, M, and D domains of CP190 simultaneously. These results suggest that architectural proteins use different mechanisms to increase the efficiency of interaction with CP190.

Expression of the three Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. Autonomy of each domain is conferred by boundary elements (insulators). Here, we have used an in situ replacement strategy to reanalyze the sequences required for the functioning of one of the best-characterized fly boundaries, Fab-7 . It was initially identified by a deletion, Fab-7 ¹ , that transformed parasegment (PS) 11 into a duplicate copy of PS12. Fab-7 ¹ deleted four nuclease hypersensitive sites, HS*, HS1, HS2, and HS3, located in between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains. Transgene and P -element excision experiments mapped the boundary to HS*+HS1+HS2, while HS3 was shown to be the iab-7 Polycomb response element (PRE). Recent replacement experiments showed that HS1 is both necessary and sufficient for boundary activity when HS3 is also presented in the replacement construct. Surprisingly, while HS1+HS3 combination has full boundary activity, we discovered that HS1 alone has only minimal function. Moreover, when combined with HS3, only the distal half of HS1, dHS1, is needed. A ∼1,000 kD multiprotein complex containing the GAF protein, called the LBC, binds to the dHS1 sequence and we show that mutations in dHS1 that disrupt LBC binding in nuclear extracts eliminate boundary activity and GAF binding in vivo . HS3 has binding sites for GAF and Pho proteins that are required for PRE silencing. In contrast, HS3 boundary activity only requires the GAF binding sites. LBC binding with HS3 in nuclear extracts, and GAF association in vivo depend upon the HS3 GAF sites, but not the Pho sites. Consistent with a role for the LBC in HS3 boundary activity, the boundary function of the dHS1+HS3 ^mPho combination is lost when the flies are heterozygous for a mutation in the GAF gene. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function for the iab-7 PREs in chromosome architecture. Author Summary: Polycomb group proteins (PcG) are important epigenetic regulators of developmental genes in all higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila, these proteins are bound to specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group Response Elements (PREs). PcG support proper patterns of homeotic gene expression throughout development. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins, including GAF and Pho. In the regulatory region of the bithorax complex (BX-C), the boundary/insulator elements organize the autonomous regulatory domains, and their active or repressed states are regulated by PREs. Here, we studied the domain organization of the Fab-7 boundary and the neighboring PRE, which separate the iab-6 and iab-7 domains involved in transcription of the Abd-B gene. It was previously thought that PRE recruits PcG proteins that inhibit activation of the iab-7 enhancers in the inappropriate domains. However, here we found that PRE contributes to boundary activity and in combination with a key 242 bp Fab-7 region (dHS1) can form a completely functional boundary. Late Boundary Complex (LBC) binds not only to dHS1 but also to PRE and is required for the boundary activity of both elements. At the same time, mutations of Pho binding sites strongly diminish recruiting of PcG but do not considerably affect boundary function, suggesting that these activities can be separated in PRE.

Abnormalities in epidermal keratinocyte proliferation are a characteristic feature of a range of dermatological conditions. These include hyperproliferative states in psoriasis and dermatitis as well as hypoproliferative states in chronic wounds. This emphasises the importance of investigating the proliferation kinetics under conditions of healthy skin and identifying the key regulators of epidermal homeostasis, maintenance, and recovery following wound healing. Animal models contribute to our understanding of human epidermal self-renewal. Human skin xenografting overcomes the ethical limitations of studying human skin during regeneration. The application of this approach has allowed for the identification of a single population of stem cells and both slowly and rapidly cycling progenitors within the epidermal basal layer and the mapping of their location in relation to rete ridges and hair follicles. Furthermore, we have traced the dynamics of the proliferation pattern reorganization that occurs during epidermal regeneration, underlining the role of YAP activity in epidermal relief formation.

The architectural protein Pita is critical for Drosophila embryogenesis and predominantly binds to gene promoters and insulators. In particular, Pita is involved in the organization of boundaries between regulatory domains that controlled the expression of three hox genes in the Bithorax complex (BX-C). The best-characterized partner for Pita is the BTB/POZ-domain containing protein CP190. Using in vitro pull-down analysis, we precisely mapped two unstructured regions of Pita that interact with the BTB domain of CP190. Then we constructed transgenic lines expressing the Pita protein of the wild-type and mutant variants lacking CP190-interacting regions. The expression of the mutant protein completely complemented the null pita mutation. ChIP-seq experiments with wild-type and mutant embryos showed that the deletion of the CP190-interacting regions did not significantly affect the binding of the mutant Pita protein to most chromatin sites. However, the mutant Pita protein does not support the ability of multimerized Pita sites to prevent cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains that activate the expression of Abdominal-B ( Abd-B ), one of the genes in the BX-C. The recruitment of a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 and CP190-interacting region of the Pita to the GAL4 binding sites on the polytene chromosomes of larvae induces the formation of a new interband, which is a consequence of the formation of open chromatin in this region. These results suggested that the interaction with CP190 is required for the primary Pita activities, but other architectural proteins may also recruit CP190 in flies expressing only the mutant Pita protein. Author Summary: Pita is required for Drosophila development and binds specifically to a long motif in active promoters and insulators. Pita belongs to the Drosophila family of zinc-finger architectural proteins, which also includes Su(Hw) and the conserved among higher eukaryotes CTCF. The architectural proteins maintain the active state of regulatory elements and the long-distance interactions between them. The CP190 protein is recruited to chromatin through interaction with the architectural proteins. Here we mapped two regions in Pita that are required for interaction with the CP190 protein. We have demonstrated that CP190-interacting region of the Pita can maintain nucleosome-free open chromatin and is critical for Pita-mediated enhancer blocking activity. At the same time, interaction with CP190 is not required for the in vivo function of the mutant Pita protein, which binds to the same regions of the genome as the wild-type protein. Unexpectedly, we found that CP190 was still associated with the most of genome regions bound by the mutant Pita protein, which suggested that other architectural proteins were continuing to recruit CP190 to these regions. These results support a model in which the regulatory elements are composed of combinations of binding sites that interact with several architectural proteins with similar functions.

One of the major problems of regenerative medicine is the development of hypertrophic scars and keloids. The protein kinase RIPK3 is involved in necroptosis; however, recent evidence indicates that it also has non-canonical functions, including its involvement in the development of renal fibrosis. The aim of our work was to study the expression of RIPK3 in mouse and human skin models of fibrotic processes. A subpopulation of RIPK3+Vim+ cells was found in both human keloid and a mouse wound, with the cell number being significantly greater in the mouse wound bed compared to healthy skin. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected expression of the Ripk3 and fibroblast biomarkers Acta2, Fap, Col1a1, and Fn1 in the cells isolated from the wound bed, indicating that RIPK3 can be expressed by wound bed fibroblasts. An analysis of the human fibroblasts stained with anti-RIPK3 antibodies demonstrated an increase in the fluorescence intensity in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at concentrations of 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng/ml and TGF-β at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 2, and 5 ng/ml compared to the control. At the same time, the expression levels of RIPK3 and fibroblast activation markers in the presence of TGF-β and LPS did not differ significantly from the control. It is possible that RIPK3 expression in wound fibroblasts is not directly associated with fibrotic processes, and that kinase plays a different, yet unknown role in wound healing.