The present study aimed to assess the sensitivity of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scale for scores other than 0 as a screening tool for sarcopenia in onco-hematology patients. A retrospective cohort study of 104 onco-hematology patients aged > 19 years and treated at the Diagnostic and Imaging Center and at an outpatient clinic of a private tertiary hospital was conducted. Sarcopenia was defined as a skeletal muscle index (SMI) of ≤ 38.5 cm2/m2 for women and ≤ 52.4 cm2/m2 for men based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans. Functional status was assessed using an ECOG-PS score of 0 (indicating no dysfunction) or a score of ≥ 1 (indicating dysfunction). Accuracy analysis was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ECOG-PS as a screening tool for sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was observed in 57.7% of patients. The median SMI was 43.3 (55.1) kg/m2. Sarcopenia diagnosis was positively associated with male sex (p = 0.027) and an ECOG-PS score of ≥ 1 (p = 0.048). As a screening tool for sarcopenia, the ECOG-PS had sensitivity and specificity of 40.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6–50.8) and 83.8% (95% CI 75.1–92.9), respectively. Sarcopenia is a challenge in cancer. The association of sarcopenia with an ECOG-PS score of ≥ 1 observed in this study reinforces the study hypothesis and importance of further studies on the subject. The current study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (approval no.: 4.971.257) on September 13, 2021. Owing to the retrospective design study, the respective ethics committee waived the need for the Free and Informed Consent Form. None. TG,: collection and assembly of data, conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, final approval of the manuscript, and writing of the manuscript; TTO, ACLS, and EYHN: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, final approval of the manuscript, and writing of the manuscript; ALCCR: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and and final approval of the manuscript; DSR: collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, and final approval of the manuscript; TGR: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, and final approval of the manuscript; LT, YN, and CAR: data analysis and interpretation, final approval of the manuscript, and provision of study materials or patient. 4.971.257. Received: 03 September 2024 Accepted: 25 November 2024 Article published online: 22 May 2025 © 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil