Cristina-Teodora Stanciu

Ms. Cristina-Teodora Stanciu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 March 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCristina-Teodora Stanciu
Cristina-Teodora Stanciu
MVMarcel Mihai Berceanu Vaduva
Marcel Mihai Berceanu Vaduva
DPDaniel Laurentiu Pop
Daniel Laurentiu Pop
DVDinu Vermesan
Dinu Vermesan
Background and Objectives: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is widely used in acute wound management, promoting tissue regeneration and edema reduction. However, the effects of integrating physiotherapy on functional recovery and quality of life remain underexplored. This study assesses the combined impact of NPWT and physiotherapy on functional and clinical outcomes in patients with acute wounds at the Timișoara County Emergency Clinical Hospital. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 205 patients divided into two groups: NPWT-only (n = 110) and NPWT plus physiotherapy (n = 95). Clinical and functional parameters, including joint mobility, edema, and pain, were assessed at baseline, ten days, six weeks, and six months. Quality of life and mental health were evaluated using WHOQOL-BREF, SF-36, VAS, and HADS questionnaires. Results: Compared to NPWT alone, the NPWT + physiotherapy group showed at discharge greater edema reduction (40.58 ± 2.48 vs. 41.15 ± 2.39), improved joint mobility (14.22 ± 1.66° vs. 10.05 ± 1.76°, p < 0.05), and a more significant pain decrease (VAS reduction to 5.68 ± 1.13 vs. 6.7 ± 1.05, p < 0.001). Quality of life scores improved notably, with higher WHOQOL-BREF (59.89 ± 5.86 vs. 66.64 ± 6.24, p < 0.001) and HADS psychological scores (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Combining NPWT with physiotherapy enhances functional recovery, reduces pain and anxiety, and improves quality of life. These findings support a multidisciplinary approach in acute wound management.

21 March 2025 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCristina-Teodora Stanciu
Cristina-Teodora Stanciu
DVDinu Vermesan
Dinu Vermesan
DPDaniel Laurentiu Pop
Daniel Laurentiu Pop
Gheorghe Bogdan HogeaGheorghe Bogdan Hogea
Gheorghe Bogdan Hogea
SVSilviu Valentin Vlad
Silviu Valentin Vlad
Background and Objectives: Optimizing functional recovery alongside wound healing remains a challenge in acute wound management. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is widely used to promote tissue regeneration and reduce edema, yet its impact on functional outcomes and quality of life is less explored. This study evaluates the effects of NPWT alone versus NPWT combined with physiotherapy, focusing on functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with acute wounds at the Timisoara County Emergency Clinical Hospital, treated between 2020 and 2024. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1, receiving NPWT exclusively, and Group 2, undergoing NPWT combined with physiotherapy (Proprioceptive Neuro-muscular Facilitation, Kabat diagonals, manual lymphatic drainage, and proprioceptive exercises). Assessments included joint mobility (goniometry), edema (circumferential measurements), muscle strength (Manual Muscle Testing), and patient-reported outcomes using WHOQOL-BREF, SF-36, and HADS questionnaires. Results: Results demonstrated that, at 10 days, patients in the specialized physiotherapy group had significantly greater ankle dorsiflexion (18.10 ± 1.63°) compared to the classical group (10.05 ± 1.76°; p < 0.001). Knee flexion in the specialized group was 134.58 ± 5.15° versus 115.57 ± 5.32° in the classical group (p < 0.001). Edema circumference and depth were reduced in both groups, with minor but notable improvements in the specialized group at later follow-ups (p < 0.05). Self-reported quality of life (SF-36, WHOQOL-BREF) and mental health (HADS) scores were slightly better at 10 days in the specialized group, although differences diminished by 6 months. Conclusions: Combining NPWT with specialized physiotherapy techniques enhances functional recovery and quality of life in acute wound patients. These findings support the integration of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation to optimize patient outcomes.

23 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCristina-Teodora Stanciu
Cristina-Teodora Stanciu
MVMilan Velimirovici
Milan Velimirovici
DVDinu Vermesan
Dinu Vermesan
CPCiprian Nicolae Pilut
Ciprian Nicolae Pilut
LSLoredana Gabriela Stana
Loredana Gabriela Stana
Gheorghe Bogdan HogeaGheorghe Bogdan Hogea
Gheorghe Bogdan Hogea
Background and Objectives: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) expedites tissue repair, yet functional recovery depends on adjunct rehabilitation. Evidence from high-resource settings is difficult to translate to Romanian county hospitals, where advanced devices are scarce. The objective of this study is to determine whether two tiers of low-technology, therapist-delivered exercise improve mobility, oedema resolution, pain and quality-of-life (QoL) beyond NPWT alone in adults with acute lower-limb wounds. Methods: A single-centre, prospective observational study (January 2021–June 2024) enrolled 92 patients and randomised them unevenly into: Group A, NPWT only (n = 39); Group B, NPWT + routine physiotherapy (n = 33); Group C, NPWT + enhanced manual programme (n = 20). All received −125 mmHg continuous suction; rehabilitation started 48 h post-operation. Primary outcomes were ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included calf circumference, ultrasound oedema depth, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), pain (VAS), analgesic use and SF-36 domains through 24 weeks. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar (p > 0.40). At 12 weeks dorsiflexion reached 20.1 ± 1.8° in Group C, surpassing Group B (18.4 ± 2.1°; p = 0.004) and Group A (16.0 ± 2.3°; p < 0.001). Knee flexion followed the same gradient (140.8 ± 3.2°, 137.6 ± 3.4°, 133.4 ± 3.8° respectively). Oedema depth fell fastest in Group C (0.4 ± 0.2 mm by day 42) versus B (0.6 ± 0.2 mm) and A (0.8 ± 0.3 mm). Week-12 MMT grade ≥ 4.5 was attained by 95% of Group C, 85% of B and 72% of A (χ2 = 10.9, p = 0.004). VAS pain fell more steeply with each rehabilitation layer, paralleled by a stepwise decline in daily tramadol. All SF-36 domains were highest in Group C at 24 weeks (Physical Function 88.7 ± 4.8 vs. 85.1 ± 5.4 vs. 78.2 ± 5.9; p < 0.001). Mobility correlated positively with QoL (r = 0.66) and inversely with pain and oedema. Conclusions: In a resource-constrained Romanian setting, adding structured manual physiotherapy to NPWT produced meaningful functional and patient-centred gains, while an “enhanced” programme incorporating daily PNF and elastic-band strengthening delivered the largest observed benefit. These findings justify prioritising therapist-led interventions even where sophisticated equipment is unavailable.