Benign gynaecological diseases are usually treated with minimally invasive approaches. Robotic surgery seems an alternative to laparoscopic surgery. No definitive conclusions have yet been made regarding comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for benign diseases. In this scenario, we performed a systematic review in order to assess the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy versus robotic surgery and conclude whether laparoscopy should be replaced by robotic surgery for the treatment of benign gynaecological conditions, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement. We included 64 studies: no significant difference was observed regarding overall complication rate; no significant benefit of robotic approach was demonstrated regarding length of hospital stay and conversion to laparotomy; furthermore, robotic surgery is more easily used by non-experienced surgeons, while it is more expensive and characterised by longer operative time. In conclusion, current evidence indicates neither statistically significant nor clinically meaningful differences in surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for benign gynaecological diseases.

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological malignancies

Abdominal pain is the most presenting complaint during pregnancy with multiple etiologies. The diagnosis could be unpredictable. We present a case of 36-year-old pregnant woman gravida 10 para 7 ab... Lay abstract A 36-year-old pregnant woman during her tenth pregnancy, known to have seven previous normal vaginal deliveries, presented at 36 weeks and 5 days of her gestational age with increasing...

Background/Objectives: The prognostic and predictive values of biomarkers in fertility-sparing management of atypical hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) remain ill-defined. We aimed to identify the impact of tumour profiles on oncologic and reproductive outcomes to inform clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, up to July 2026. We intended to include comparative studies or clinical trials, in English or French, assessing outcomes according to molecular or hormonal profiles in reproductive-aged women diagnosed with AH or EC. The primary outcome was the best overall complete remission (CR). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model with logit transformation and restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025632885). Results: Eighteen retrospective studies comprising 965 patients were included. No specific molecular profile (NSMP) tumours demonstrated significantly higher odds of CR (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.33–3.11). p53-abnormal (p53abn) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumours were significantly less likely to achieve CR compared to NSMP (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.80–8.29 and OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.44–4.29, respectively). POLE-mutated (POLEmut) tumours showed CR comparable to NSMP (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.60–3.24). Progesterone receptor (PR) positivity was strongly associated with CR (OR 7.73, 95% CI 2.77–21.63). Conclusions: NSMP and PR-positivity represented a favourable prognosis and potential prediction of CR. POLEmut tumours demonstrated CR rates comparable to NSMP, whereas p53abn and dMMR demonstrated unfavourable outcomes. These findings support a biologically tailored approach to patient selection for fertility-sparing management.