Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common valve disease, which consists of a chronic interplay of inflammation, fibrosis, and calcification. In this study, sortilin (SORT1) was identified as a novel key player in the pathophysiology of CAVD, and its role in the transformation of valvular interstitial cells (VICs) into pathological phenotypes is explored. An aortic valve (AV) wire injury (AVWI) mouse model with sortilin deficiency was used to determine the effects of sortilin on AV stenosis, fibrosis, and calcification. In vitro experiments employed human primary VICs cultured in osteogenic conditions for 7, 14, and 21 days; and processed for imaging, proteomics, and transcriptomics including single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq). The AVWI mouse model showed reduced AV fibrosis, calcification, and stenosis in sortilin-deficient mice vs. littermate controls. Protein studies identified the transition of human VICs into a myofibroblast-like phenotype mediated by sortilin. Sortilin loss-of-function decreased in vitro VIC calcification. ScRNA-seq identified 12 differentially expressed cell clusters in human VIC samples, where a novel combined inflammatory myofibroblastic-osteogenic VIC (IMO-VIC) phenotype was detected with increased expression of SORT1, COL1A1, WNT5A, IL-6, and serum amyloid A1. VICs sequenced with sortilin deficiency showed decreased IMO-VIC phenotype. Sortilin promotes CAVD by mediating valvular fibrosis and calcification, and a newly identified phenotype (IMO-VIC). This is the first study to examine the role of sortilin in valvular calcification and it may render it a therapeutic target to inhibit IMO-VIC emergence by simultaneously reducing inflammation, fibrosis, and calcification, the three key pathological processes underlying CAVD. Multi-omic approach to identify the role of sortilin in mediating fibrosis and calcification in calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Aortic valve (AV) wire injury in sortilin wild-type (Sort1^+/+) and deficient mice (Sort1^−/−) showed decreased collagen deposition and calcification in mouse AVs. Valvular interstitial cells (VICs) were collected from human CAVD tissue and cultured in osteogenic conditions. VICs collected at varying time points of culture (Days 7, 14, and 21) were processed for flow cytometry, proteomics, and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq). Multiomics data identified increased sortilin expression following the osteogenic culture of VICs. Protein analysis and scRNA-seq identified increased expression of WNT5a, MAPK, YAP, and IL-6 regulated by the expression of sortilin. ScRNA-seq identified a transitionary VIC subpopulation with an activated myofibroblast phenotype that later transitioned into a combined myofibroblast and osteogenic phenotype. ScRNA-seq data identified an inflammatory myofibroblastic-osteogenic VIC (IMO-VIC) subpopulation that may be a key player in the pathogenesis of CAVD under the regulation of sortilin.

BACKGROUND: New pharmacological approaches are needed to prevent stent restenosis. This study tested the hypothesis that pemafibrate, a novel clinical selective PPARα (peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor α) agonist, suppresses coronary stent‐induced arterial inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Yorkshire pigs randomly received either oral pemafibrate (30 mg/day; n=6) or control vehicle (n=7) for 7 days, followed by coronary arterial implantation of 3.5 × 12 mm bare metal stents (2–4 per animal; 44 stents total). On day 7, intracoronary molecular‐structural near‐infrared fluorescence and optical coherence tomography imaging was performed to assess the arterial inflammatory response, demonstrating that pemafibrate reduced stent‐induced inflammatory protease activity (near‐infrared fluorescence target‐to‐background ratio: pemafibrate, median [25th‐75th percentile]: 2.8 [2.5–3.3] versus control, 4.1 [3.3–4.3], P =0.02). At day 28, animals underwent repeat near‐infrared fluorescence–optical coherence tomography imaging and were euthanized, and coronary stent tissue molecular and histological analyses. Day 28 optical coherence tomography imaging showed that pemafibrate significantly reduced stent neointima volume (pemafibrate, 43.1 [33.7–54.1] mm ³ versus control, 54.2 [41.2–81.1] mm ³ ; P =0.03). In addition, pemafibrate suppressed day 28 stent‐induced cellular inflammation and neointima expression of the inflammatory mediators TNF‐α (tumor necrosis factor‐α) and MMP‐9 (matrix metalloproteinase 9) and enhanced the smooth muscle differentiation markers calponin and smoothelin. In vitro assays indicated that the STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3)–myocardin axes mediated the inhibitory effects of pemafibrate on smooth muscle cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Pemafibrate reduces preclinical coronary stent inflammation and neointimal hyperplasia following bare metal stent deployment. These results motivate further trials evaluating pemafibrate as a new strategy to prevent clinical stent restenosis.

Use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is endorsed by society guidelines, but US data on real-world outcomes are lacking. Medicare claims data were identified for inpatient PCIs performed October 2015 to March 2020, with IVUS/OCT captured by ICD-10-PCS codes. Three-way propensity score matching (angio vs IVUS vs OCT) on baseline and procedural characteristics was performed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or repeat revascularization, was evaluated through 3 years, with a 30-day blanking window after index PCI to exclude staged procedures. Of the 502,821 PCI procedures, 463,201 (92%) were guided by angiography alone, with IVUS or OCT used in 37,908 (7.5%) and 1712 (0.3%), respectively. After propensity matching, compared with angiography, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular event was similar for IVUS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.03; P = .285) but lower for OCT (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; P = .001). A similar trend was observed in clinically relevant subgroups. Compared with angiography alone, the risk of MI or repeat revascularization was lower with OCT (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P = .015), and the risk of MI alone was lower with IVUS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .038). In a real-world US cohort, IVUS and OCT were used infrequently during PCI. Compared with angiography alone, use of intracoronary imaging during index PCI was associated with lower rates of clinical events through 3 years.