Objectives: Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) risks thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Optimal anti-coagulation monitoring is controversial. We compared coagulation tests evaluating the heparin effect in pediatric ECLS. Methods: A retrospective study of children (<18yrs) undergoing ECLS over 12 months in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Variables included anti-Factor Xa activity (anti-Xa), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), activated clotting time (ACT) and thromboelastogram (TEG^®6s) parameters: ratio and delta reaction (R) times (the ratio and difference, respectively, between R times in kaolin assays with and without heparinase). Test results were correlated with unfractionated heparin infusion rate (IU/kg/hr) at the time of sampling. Mean test results of each ECLS run were evaluated according to the presence/absence of complications. Results: Thirty-two ECLS runs (31 patients) generated 695 data-points for correlation. PICU mortality was 22% and the thrombotic complication rate was 66%. The proportion of variation in coagulation test results explained by heparin dose was 13.3% for anti-Xa, 11.9% for ratio R time, and 9.9% for delta R time, compared with <1% for ACT and aPTT. Incorporating individual variation, age and antithrombin activity in a model with heparin dose explained less than 50% of the variation in test results. Correlation varied according to age, day of ECLS run and between individuals, with parallel dose-response lines noted between patients. Significantly lower mean anti-Xa was observed in PICU non-survivors and runs with thrombosis. Conclusion: Lower anti-Xa was observed in ECLS runs with complications. Although absolute results from anti-Xa and TEG6^®s showed the best correlation with heparin dose, a large proportion of variation in results was unexplained by heparin, while dose response was similar between individuals. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling is required, as well as prospective trials to delineate the superior means of adjusting heparin therapy to prevent adverse clinical outcomes.

Introduction Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a major cause of infant mortality. Many infants with CHD require corrective surgery with most operations requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB triggers a systemic inflammatory response which is associated with low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality. Delivery of nitric oxide (NO) into CPB circuits can provide myocardial protection and reduce bypass-induced inflammation, leading to less LCOS and improved recovery. We hypothesised that using NO during CPB increases ventilator-free days (VFD) (the number of days patients spend alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation up until day 28) compared with standard care. Here, we describe the NITRIC trial protocol. Methods and analysis The NITRIC trial is a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, two-sided superiority trial to be conducted in six paediatric cardiac surgical centres. One thousand three-hundred and twenty infants <2 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB will be randomly assigned to NO at 20 ppm administered into the CPB oxygenator for the duration of CPB or standard care (no NO) in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by age (<6 and ≥6 weeks), single ventricle physiology (Y/N) and study centre. The primary outcome will be VFD to day 28. Secondary outcomes include a composite of LCOS, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or death within 28 days of surgery; length of stay in intensive care and in hospital; and, healthcare costs. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Preplanned secondary analyses will investigate the impact of NO on host inflammatory profiles postsurgery. Ethics and dissemination The study has ethical approval (HREC/17/QRCH/43, dated 26 April 2017), is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000821392) and commenced recruitment in July 2017. The primary manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number ACTRN12617000821392

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric sepsis results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is an urgent need to investigate adjunctive therapies that can be administered early. We hypothesize that using vitamin C combined with hydrocortisone increases survival free of inotropes/vasopressors support until day 7 compared with standard care. Here we describe the Resuscitation in Paediatric Septic Shock using Vitamin C and Hydrocortisone (RESPOND) trial protocol, which aims to address this hypothesis. DESIGN: Randomized, open label, controlled, parallel-group, three-arm trial with integrated economic evaluation. SETTING: Nine Australia and New Zealand PICUs, with interest from additional international sites. PATIENTS: Children between 7 days and younger than 18 years old who are treated for suspected or confirmed sepsis and receiving inotropes/vasopressors for greater than 1 hour. INTERVENTIONS: IV vitamin C (100 mg/kg [maximum 5 g] every 6 hr) and hydrocortisone (1 mg/kg [maximum 50 mg] every 6 hr), or IV hydrocortisone alone (1 mg/kg [maximum 50 mg] every 6 hr) or standard care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-four children will be randomly assigned to receive the interventions, or standard care in a 1:1:1 ratio with stratification by steroid administration pre-randomization and hospital site. The primary outcome is time alive and free of inotropes/vasopressors, censored at 7 days. Secondary outcomes include 28-day mortality, survival free of organ support, PICU length of stay, quality of life, functional status and neurodevelopmental vulnerability at 6 months post-enrollment, and hospitalization-related costs. Statistical analysis will be based on an intention-to-treat principle. The study has ethical approval (HREC/20/QCHQ/69922, dated December 21, 2020), is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000247875), commenced recruitment on December 8, 2021, and is expected to finish recruitment by mid-2026. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of the results will occur through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international conferences, and additional consumer-informed pathways.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides support for the pulmonary or cardiovascular function of children in whom the predicted mortality risk remains very high. The inevitable host inflammatory response and activation of the coagulation cascade due to the extracorporeal circuit contribute to additional morbidity and mortality in these patients. Mixing nitric oxide (NO) into the sweep gas of ECMO circuits may reduce the inflammatory and coagulation cascade activation during ECMO support. Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and safety of mixing NO into the sweep gas of ECMO systems and assess its effect on inflammation and coagulation system activation through a pilot randomized controlled trial. Methods: The Nitric Oxide on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates and Children (NECTAR) trial is an open-label, parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial to be conducted at a single center. Fifty patients who require ECMO support will be randomly assigned to receive either NO mixed into the sweep gas of the ECMO system at 20 ppm for the duration of ECMO or standard care (no NO) in a 1:1 ratio, with stratification by support type (veno-venous vs veno-arterial ECMO). Results: Outcome measures will focus on feasibility (recruitment rate and consent rate, and successful inflammatory marker measurements), the safety of the intervention (oxygenation and carbon dioxide control within defined parameters and methemoglobin levels), and proxy markers of efficacy (assessment of cytokines, chemokines, and coagulation factors to assess the impact of NO on host inflammation and coagulation cascade activation, clotting of ECMO components, including computer tomography scanning of oxygenators for clot assessments), bleeding complications, as well as total blood product use. Survival without ECMO and the length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are clinically relevant efficacy outcomes. Long-term outcomes include neurodevelopmental assessments (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire, and others) and quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and others) measured at 6 and 12 months post ECMO cannulation. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Conclusions: The NECTAR study investigates the safety and feasibility of NO as a drug intervention during extracorporeal life support and explores its efficacy. The study will investigate whether morbidity and mortality in patients treated with ECMO can be improved with NO. The intervention targets adverse outcomes in patients who are supported by ECMO and who have high expected mortality and morbidity. The study will be one of the largest randomized controlled trials performed among pediatric patients supported by ECMO. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001518156; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376869 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43760

In this article, a retrospective study was performed to describe the impact of merging two pediatric intensive care units on the overall and neurocognitive outcomes of children who required extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Results from three cohorts were compared: 2008 to 2014: premerge, 2014 to 2017: initial time period postmerge, and 2018 to 2019: established merge. Survival to hospital discharge (and with good neurological outcome) was of 68% (61%), 46% (36%), and 79% (71%), respectively, for the three time periods. Merging two hospitals resulted in a nonsignificant trend toward temporary worse outcomes in pediatric patients requiring ECPR.