Jinnette Abbott

Dr. Jinnette Abbott


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2020 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVijay Kunadian
Vijay Kunadian
ACAlaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo
PCPaolo G Camici
Paolo G Camici
CBColin Berry
Colin Berry
JEJavier Escaned
Javier Escaned
ABAndreas Baumbach
Andreas Baumbach
This consensus document, a summary of the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), appraises the importance of ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Angina pectoris affects approximately 112 million people globally. Up to 70% of patients undergoing invasive angiography do not have obstructive coronary artery disease, more common in women than in men, and a large proportion have INOCA as a cause of their symptoms. INOCA patients present with a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs that are often misdiagnosed as non-cardiac leading to under-diagnosis/investigation and under-treatment. INOCA can result from heterogeneous mechanism including coronary vasospasm and microvascular dysfunction and is not a benign condition. Compared to asymptomatic individuals, INOCA is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events, repeated hospital admissions, as well as impaired quality of life and associated increased health care costs. This consensus document provides a definition of INOCA and guidance to the community on the diagnostic approach and management of INOCA based on existing evidence from research and best available clinical practice; noting gaps in knowledge and potential areas for further investigation.

1 January 2017 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDhaval Kolte
Dhaval Kolte
SKSahil Khera
Sahil Khera
MSM. Rizwan Sardar
M. Rizwan Sardar
NGNeil Gheewala
Neil Gheewala
TGTanush Gupta
Tanush Gupta
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott
Background—: Readmissions after cardiac procedures are common and contribute to increased healthcare utilization and costs. Data on 30-day readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. Methods and Results—: Patients undergoing TAVR ( International Classification of Diseases -Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05 and 35.06) between January and November 2013 who survived the index hospitalization were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Incidence, predictors, causes, and costs of 30-day readmissions were analyzed. Of 12 221 TAVR patients, 2188 (17.9%) were readmitted within 30 days. Length of stay >5 days during index hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–1.73), acute kidney injury (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05–1.44), >4 Elixhauser comorbidities (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03–1.46), transapical TAVR (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05–1.39), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04–1.39), chronic lung disease (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01–1.34), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01–1.34) were independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Readmissions were because of noncardiac causes in 61.8% of cases and because of cardiac causes in 38.2% of cases. Respiratory (14.7%), infections (12.8%), bleeding (7.6%), and peripheral vascular disease (4.3%) were the most common noncardiac causes, whereas heart failure (22.5%) and arrhythmias (6.6%) were the most common cardiac causes of readmission. Median length of stay and cost of readmissions were 4 days (interquartile range, 2–7 days) and $8302 (interquartile range, $5229–16 021), respectively. Conclusions—: Thirty-day readmissions after TAVR are frequent and are related to baseline comorbidities, TAVR access site, and post-procedure complications. Awareness of these predictors can help identify and target high-risk patients for interventions to reduce readmissions and costs.

1 January 2018 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarwan Saad
Marwan Saad
RNRamez Nairooz
Ramez Nairooz
NPNaga Venkata K. Pothineni
Naga Venkata K. Pothineni
AAAhmed Almomani
Ahmed Almomani
SKSwathi Kovelamudi
Swathi Kovelamudi
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott

1 June 2018 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDhaval Kolte
Dhaval Kolte
SKSahil Khera
Sahil Khera
SVSreekanth Vemulapalli
Sreekanth Vemulapalli
DDDadi Dai
Dadi Dai
SHStephan Heo
Stephan Heo
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott

1 July 2007 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott
HAHanna N. Ahmed
Hanna N. Ahmed
HVHelen A. Vlachos
Helen A. Vlachos
FSFaith Selzer
Faith Selzer
DWDavid O. Williams
David O. Williams

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTorrey Schmidt
Torrey Schmidt
JAJinnette Abbott
Jinnette Abbott
The history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is marked by rapid technological advancements that have taken place over the past 40 years. After a period of balloon angioplasty, which was marred by risk of abrupt vessel closure and vessel recoil, balloon expandable metal alloy stents were the mainstay of PCI. The introduction of drug eluting stents (DES) targeted in-stent restenosis, a common mode of stent failure, and ushered in the current PCI era. Since the first generation of DES, advances in polymer science and stent design have advanced the field. The current generation of DES has thin struts, are highly deliverable, have biocompatible or absorbable polymers, and outstanding safety and efficacy profiles. In this review, we discuss the technological advancements in stent development, design, and construction, with an emphasis on balloon expandable stents. The aspects of stent properties, metal alloys, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, drug elution, and polymers will be covered.