Rakesh K Upadhyay

Dr. Rakesh K Upadhyay

Purdue University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

5 September 2019 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RURakesh K Upadhyay
Rakesh K Upadhyay
Avtar HandaAvtar Handa
Avtar Handa
RURakesh Upadhyay
Rakesh Upadhyay
Lipoxygenases (LOXs; EC 1.13.11.12) catalyze the oxygenation of fatty acids to produce oxylipins including the jasmonate family of plant hormones. The involvement of jasmonates in plant growth and development and during abiotic stress has been documented, however, the response and regulation of each member of the LOX gene family under various abiotic stresses is yet to be fully deciphered. Previously, we identified fourteen members of the tomato LOX gene family, which were divisible into nine genes representing the 9-LOX family members and five others representing the 13-LOX family members based on the carbon oxidation position specificity of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Here, we have determined the transcript abundance patterns of all the 14 LOX genes in response to four independent abiotic stresses, namely, heat, cold, drought and salt. Our results show that each of these stresses leads to a time-dependent, variable or indifferent response of specific and different set(s) of LOX gene members of both subfamilies, differentiating functional relevance of the 14 LOX genes analyzed. Out of the 14 gene members, three LOX genes were expressed constitutively or were non-responsive to either heat (SlLOX9), cold (SlLOX9) or salt (SlLOX4) stress. An in-silico LOX gene promoter search for stress-responsive elements revealed that only some but not all of the LOX genes indeed are decorated with specific and known stress responsive cis-acting elements. Thus, these data implicate some other, yet to be discovered, cis-acting elements present in the LOX gene family members, which seemingly regulate tomato responses to defined abiotic stresses presented here.

22 July 2020 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RURakesh K Upadhyay
Rakesh K Upadhyay
TFTahira Fatima
Tahira Fatima
Avtar HandaAvtar Handa
Avtar Handa
AMAutar Mattoo
Autar Mattoo
Polyamines (PAs) regulate growth in plants and modulate the whole plant life cycle. They have been associated with different abiotic and biotic stresses, but little is known about the molecular regulation involved. We quantified gene expression of PA anabolic and catabolic pathway enzymes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Ailsa Craig) leaves under heat versus cold stress. These include arginase 1 and 2, arginine decarboxylase 1 and 2, agmatine iminohydrolase/deiminase 1, N-carbamoyl putrescine amidase, two ornithine decarboxylases, three S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylases, two spermidine synthases; spermine synthase; flavin-dependent polyamine oxidases (SlPAO4-like and SlPAO2) and copper dependent amine oxidases (SlCuAO and SlCuAO-like). The spatiotemporal transcript abundances using qRT-PCR revealed presence of their transcripts in all tissues examined, with higher transcript levels observed for SAMDC1, SAMDC2 and ADC2 in most tissues. Cellular levels of free and conjugated forms of putrescine and spermidine were found to decline during heat stress while they increased in response to cold stress, revealing their differential responses. Transcript levels of ARG2, SPDS2, and PAO4-like increased in response to both heat and cold stresses. However, transcript levels of ARG1/2, AIH1, CPA, SPDS1 and CuAO4 increased in response to heat while those of ARG2, ADC1,2, ODC1, SAMDC1,2,3, PAO2 and CuPAO4-like increased in response to cold stress, respectively. Transcripts of ADC1,2, ODC1,2, and SPMS declined in response to heat stress while ODC2 transcripts declined under cold stress. These results show differential expression of PA metabolism genes under heat and cold stresses with more impairment clearly seen under heat stress. We interpret these results to indicate a more pronounced role of PAs in cold stress acclimation compared to that under heat stress in tomato leaves.

9 July 2013 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RURakesh K Upadhyay
Rakesh K Upadhyay
DSDevendra K. Soni
Devendra K. Soni
RSRuchi Singh
Ruchi Singh
UDUpendra N. Dwivedi
Upendra N. Dwivedi
UPUday V. Pathre
Uday V. Pathre
ASAniruddha P. Sane
Aniruddha P. Sane
The AP2 domain class of transcription factors is a large family of genes with various roles in plant development and adaptation but with very little functional information in plants other than Arabidopsis. Here, the characterization of an EAR motif-containing transcription factor, SlERF36, from tomato that affects stomatal density, conductance, and photosynthesis is described. Heterologous expression of SlERF36 under the CaMV35S promoter in tobacco leads to a 25–35% reduction in stomatal density but without any effect on stomatal size or sensitivity. Reduction in stomatal density leads to a marked reduction in stomatal conductance (42–56%) as well as transpiration and is associated with reduced CO2 assimilation rates, reduction in growth, early flowering, and senescence. A prominent adaptive response of SlERF36 overexpressors is development of constitutively high non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) that might function as a protective measure to prevent damage from high excitation pressure. The high NPQ leads to markedly reduced light utilization and low electron transport rates even at low light intensities. Taken together, these data suggest that SlERF36 exerts a negative control over stomatal density and modulates photosynthesis and plant development through its direct or indirect effects.

8 March 2022 in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAsmita Gupta
Asmita Gupta
RURakesh K Upadhyay
Rakesh K Upadhyay
RPRakhi Prabhakar
Rakhi Prabhakar
NTNeerja Tiwari
Neerja Tiwari
RGRashmi Garg
Rashmi Garg
ASAniruddha P. Sane
Aniruddha P. Sane

1 July 2017 in Journal of Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RURakesh K Upadhyay
Rakesh K Upadhyay
AGAsmita Gupta
Asmita Gupta
DSDevendra Soni
Devendra Soni
RGRashmi Garg
Rashmi Garg
UPUday V. Pathre
Uday V. Pathre
ASAniruddha P. Sane
Aniruddha P. Sane