Barry L. Shulkin

Dr. Barry L. Shulkin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2011 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHervé J BRISSE
Hervé J BRISSE
BMBeth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
Beth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
CGClaudio Granata
Claudio Granata
KKK. Barbara Krug
K. Barbara Krug
SWSandra L. Wootton-Gorges
Sandra L. Wootton-Gorges
TMTom Monclair
Tom Monclair
Neuroblastoma is an enigmatic disease entity; some tumors disappear spontaneously without any therapy, while others progress with a fatal outcome despite the implementation of maximal modern therapy. However, strong prognostic factors can accurately predict whether children have "good" or "bad" disease at diagnosis, and the clinical stage is currently the most significant and clinically relevant prognostic factor. Therefore, for an individual patient, proper staging is of paramount importance for risk assessment and selection of optimal treatment. In 2009, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Project proposed a new staging system designed for tumor staging before any treatment, including surgery. Compared with the focus of the International Neuroblastoma Staging System, which is currently the most used, the focus has now shifted from surgicopathologic findings to imaging findings. The new INRG Staging System includes two stages of localized disease, which are dependent on whether image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) are or are not present. IDRFs are features detected with imaging at the time of diagnosis. The present consensus report was written by the INRG Imaging Committee to optimize imaging and staging and reduce interobserver variability. The rationales for using imaging methods (ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and scintigraphy), as well as technical guidelines, are described. Definitions of the terms recommended for assessing IDRFs are provided with examples. It is anticipated that the use of standardized nomenclature will contribute substantially to more uniform staging and thereby facilitate comparisons of clinical trials conducted in different parts of the world.

1 September 2004 in Endocrine-Related Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GEGraeme Eisenhofer
Graeme Eisenhofer
SBStefan R Bornstein
Stefan R Bornstein
FBFrederieke M Brouwers
Frederieke M Brouwers
NCNai-Kong V Cheung
Nai-Kong V Cheung
PDPatricia L Dahia
Patricia L Dahia
WYWilliam F Young
William F Young
Pheochromocytomas are rare catecholamine-producing neuroendocrine tumors that are usually benign, but which may also present as or develop into a malignancy. Predicting such behavior is notoriously difficult and there are currently no curative treatments for malignant tumors. This report follows from a workshop at the Banbury Conference Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, on the 16th–18th November 2003, held to review the state of science and to facilitate future progress in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma. The rarity of the tumor and the resulting fragmented nature of studies, typically involving small numbers of patients, represent limiting factors to the development of effective treatments and diagnostic or prognostic markers for malignant disease. Such development is being facilitated by the availability of new genomics-based tools, but for such approaches to succeed ultimately requires comprehensive clinical studies involving large numbers of patients, stringently collected clinical data and tumor samples, and interdisciplinary collaborations among multiple specialist centers. Nevertheless, the well-characterized hereditary basis and the unique functional nature of these neuroendocrine tumors provide a useful framework that offers advantages for establishing the pathways of tumorigenesis and malignancy. Such findings may have relevance for understanding the basis of other more common malignancies where similar frameworks are not available. As the relevant pathways leading to pheochromocytoma are established it should be possible to take advantage of the new generation of drugs being developed to target specific pathways in other malignancies. Again the success of this will require well-designed and coordinated multicenter studies.

1 July 2017 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRajen Mody
Rajen Mody
ANArlene Naranjo
Arlene Naranjo
CRCollin Van Ryn
Collin Van Ryn
AYAlice L. Yu
Alice L. Yu
WLWendy B London
Wendy B London
RBRochelle Bagatell
Rochelle Bagatell

1 July 1999 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBarry L. Shulkin
Barry L. Shulkin
NTNorman W. Thompson
Norman W. Thompson
BSBrahm Shapiro
Brahm Shapiro
IFIsaac R. Francis
Isaac R. Francis
JSJames C. Sisson
James C. Sisson
PURPOSE: To assess the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) in pheochromocytomas and, secondarily, to compare images obtained with FDG PET to those obtained with metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with one or more known or subsequently proved pheochromocytomas underwent FDG PET (35 scans) and MIBG scintigraphy (35 scans). Tumor uptake of FDG was quantified on positive PET scans. RESULTS: Tumor uptake of FDG was detected in 22 of 29 patients. Most benign (seven of 12 patients) and most malignant (15 of 17 patients) pheochromocytomas and their metastases avidly concentrated FDG. In four patients whose pheochromocytomas failed to accumulate MIBG, uptake of FDG in the tumors was intense. For the majority of the 16 patients whose tumors concentrated both agents, however, ratings for MIBG images compared to FDG PET images for delineation of the tumor in comparison to background and normal organ ...

27 January 2021 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AYAlice L. Yu
Alice L. Yu
AGAndrew L. Gilman
Andrew L. Gilman
MOM. Fevzi Ozkaynak
M. Fevzi Ozkaynak
ANArlene Naranjo
Arlene Naranjo
MDMitchell B. Diccianni
Mitchell B. Diccianni
PSPaul Sondel
Paul Sondel
Purpose: Previously our randomized phase III trial demonstrated that immunotherapy including dinutuximab, a chimeric anti-GD2 mAb, GM-CSF, and IL2 improved survival for children with high-risk neuroblastoma that had responded to induction and consolidation therapy. These results served as the basis for FDA approval of dinutuximab. We now present long-term follow-up results and evaluation of predictive biomarkers. Patients and Methods: Patients recieved six cycles of isotretinoin with or without five cycles of immunotherapy which consists of dinutuximab with GM-CSF alternating with IL2. Accrual was discontinued early due to meeting the protocol-defined stopping rule for efficacy, as assessed by 2-year event-free survival (EFS). Plasma levels of dinutuximab, soluble IL2 receptor (sIL2R), and human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) were assessed by ELISA. Fcγ receptor 2A and 3A genotypes were determined by PCR and direct sequencing. Results: For 226 eligible randomized patients, 5-year EFS was 56.6 ± 4.7% for patients randomized to immunotherapy (n = 114) versus 46.1 ± 5.1% for those randomized to isotretinoin only (n = 112; P = 0.042). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 73.2 ± 4.2% versus 56.6 ± 5.1% for immunotherapy and isotretinoin only patients, respectively (P = 0.045). Thirteen of 122 patients receiving dinutuximab developed HACA. Plasma levels of dinutuximab, HACA, and sIL2R did not correlate with EFS/OS, or clinically significant toxicity. Fcγ receptor 2A and 3A genotypes did not correlate with EFS/OS. Conclusions: Immunotherapy with dinutuximab improved outcome for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Early stoppage for efficacy resulted in a smaller sample size than originally planned, yet clinically significant long-term differences in survival were observed.

27 April 2010 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMK K Matthay
K K Matthay
BSBarry L. Shulkin
Barry L. Shulkin
RLR Ladenstein
R Ladenstein
JMJ Michon
J Michon
FGF Giammarile
F Giammarile
SCS L Cohn
S L Cohn
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions: